Two Years of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Data from the Georgia Coastal Plain, USA.
Journal
Scientific data
ISSN: 2052-4463
Titre abrégé: Sci Data
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101640192
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Sep 2024
27 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
03
10
2023
accepted:
29
07
2024
medline:
28
9
2024
pubmed:
28
9
2024
entrez:
27
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The sustainable management of Earth's complex ecosystems requires an abundance of field data to support long term stewardship. Remotely sensed satellite data provide crucial supplements to field measurements and are essential for deriving key operational products for monitoring Earth systems. However, to accurately calibrate and validate the models used to develop monitoring datasets, coincident field measurements are required. In 2018 and 2019, data related to cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) crops were collected from five fields in two farms located in Georgia, USA. Collections were timed to coincide with satellite overpasses to support the development of remote sensing-based crop and soil data products. Data collected include soil moisture, plant water content, above ground biomass, crop height, plant phenology, and field management practices (row direction, row spacing, and plant density). The datasets include 512 records collected in 2018 and 303 records collected in 2019. The data are archived in the National Agricultural Library Ag Data Commons repository and are available for use by researchers seeking crop and soil validation data.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39333553
doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03716-z
pii: 10.1038/s41597-024-03716-z
doi:
Substances chimiques
Soil
0
Types de publication
Dataset
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1037Subventions
Organisme : United States Department of Agriculture | Agricultural Research Service (USDA Agricultural Research Service)
ID : 6048-13000-027-00D
Organisme : National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
ID : 16-WATER16-2-0045
Informations de copyright
© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Références
Thenkabail, P. S. Remote Sensing of Land Resources: Monitoring, Modeling, and Mapping Advances Over the Last 50 Years and a Vision for the Future, 791–831. Remote Sensing Handbook. https://doi.org/10.1201/b19322-38 (CRC Press, 2016).
Entekhabi, D. et al. The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Mission. Proc. IEEE 98, 704–716, https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2010.2043918 (2010).
doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2010.2043918
Chan, S. et al. Development and assessment of the SMAP enhanced passive soil moisture product. Remote. Sens. Environ. 204, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.08.025 (2018).
Weiss, M., Jacob, F. & Duveiller, G. Remote sensing for agricultural applications: A meta-review. Remote. Sens. Environ. 236, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111402 (2020).
Inoue, Y. Satellite- and drone-based remote sensing of crops and soils for smart farming - a review. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 66, 798–810, https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2020.1738899 (2020).
Colliander, A. et al. Validation of SMAP surface soil moisture products with core validation sites. Remote. Sens. Environ. 191, 215–231, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.01.021 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.01.021
Rowlandson, T. L. et al. Evaluation of several calibration procedures for a portable soil moisture sensor. J. Hydrol. 498, 335–344, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.05.021 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.05.021
Hosseini, M. et al. Soil moisture and vegetation measurement guideline. Report, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (2018).
Jolivot, A. et al. Harmonized in situ datasets for agricultural land use mapping and monitoring in tropical countries. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 5951–5967, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-5951-2021 (2021).
Whitcomb, J. et al. Evaluation of SMAP core validation site representativeness errors using dense networks of in situ sensors and random forests. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote. Sens. 13, 6457–6472, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2020.3033591 (2020).
doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2020.3033591
Baffaut, C. et al. Comparative analysis of water budgets across the U.S. Long-Term Agroecosystem Research Network. J. Hydrol. 588, 125021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125021 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125021
Goodrich, D. C. et al. Long term agroecosystem research experimental watershed network. Hydrol. Process. 36, e14534, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14534 (2022).
doi: 10.1002/hyp.14534
Bosch, D. D. et al. Little River Experimental Watershed, a keystone in understanding of coastal plain watersheds. Hydrol. Process. 35, e14334, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14334 (2021).
doi: 10.1002/hyp.14334
Bosch, D. D. & Sheridan, J. M. Stream discharge database, Little River Experimental Watershed, Georgia, United States. Water Resour. Res. 43, n/a–n/a, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005833 (2007).
doi: 10.1029/2006WR005833
Sadler, E. J. et al. STEWARDS: A decade of increasing the impact of Agricultural Research Service watershed research programs. J. Soil Water Conserv. 75, 50A–56A, https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.75.3.50A (2020).
doi: 10.2489/jswc.75.3.50A
Hosseini, M. & McNairn, H. Using multi-polarization C- and L-band synthetic aperture radar to estimate biomass and soil moisture of wheat fields. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation 58, 50–64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2017.01.006 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2017.01.006
Meyer, F. Spaceborne Synthetic Aperture Radar – Principles, Data Access, and Basic Processing Techniques (NASA, 2019).
Dingle Robertson, L. et al. C-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery for the classification of diverse cropping systems. Int. J. Remote. Sens. 41, 9628–9649, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1805136 (2020).
doi: 10.1080/01431161.2020.1805136
Dingle Robertson, L. et al. Using dense time-series of C-band SAR imagery for classification of diverse, worldwide agricultural systems. In 2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.
Coffin, A. et al. Cropping patterns over two decades in the Little River Experimental Watershed, Georgia, USA. In Enhancing Landscapes for Sustainable Intensification and Watershed Resiliency: Proceedings of the Seventh Interagency Conference on Research in the Watersheds, 186–190, https://doi.org/10.2737/srs-gtr-264 (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC, 2022).
Seyfried, M. S. & Murdock, M. D. Measurement of soil water content with a 50-mhz soil dielectric sensor. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68, 394–403, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.3940 (2004).
doi: 10.2136/sssaj2004.3940
Allaby, M., Allaby, R., Gregory, K., Mellanby, K. & Whitmore, T. The concise Oxford dictionary of ecology, (1994).
Munger, P. et al. Phenological growth stages of the cotton plant (Gossypium hirsutum L.): Codification and description according to the BBCH scale. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 180, 143–149, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.1998.tb00384.x (1998).
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.1998.tb00384.x
Coffin, AW., Cosh, MH., & Pisarello, K. Data from: Two years of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum l.) data from the Gulf Atlantic Coastal Plain LTAR network site, https://doi.org/10.15482/USDA.ADC/1529757 (2023).
Bosch, D. D. Comparison of capacitance-based soil water probes in coastal plain soils. Vadose Zone J. 3, 1380–1389, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2004.1380 (2004).
doi: 10.2136/vzj2004.1380
Seyfried, M. S., Grant, L. E., Du, E. & Humes, K. Dielectric loss and calibration of the hydra probe soil water sensor. Vadose Zone J. 4, 1070–1079, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2004.0148 (2005).
doi: 10.2136/vzj2004.0148