Optimising remote health workforce retention: protocol for a program of research.
Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services
Health workforce
Participatory action research
Personnel turnover
Realist evaluation
Remote health
Retention
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Sep 2024
27 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
31
07
2024
accepted:
21
09
2024
medline:
28
9
2024
pubmed:
28
9
2024
entrez:
28
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Nowhere is optimising healthcare staff retention more important than in primary health care (PHC) settings in remote Australia, where there are unacceptably high rates of staff burnout and turnover. Ensuing consequences for the remote health services and the community are acute - staffing shortfalls in clinics; organisational instability; excessive costs associated with frequent staff recruitment and orientation; diminished access to PHC for patients in need; and lack of continuity of patient care; all of which further entrench poor health outcomes for the community. Optimising remote healthcare staff retention is critical in order to provide high quality and continued PHC. Currently, however, there is paucity of knowledge to inform targeted and effective retention strategies in remote health services. This research program seeks to develop a stronger evidence base to understand (i) what retention strategies are effective in improving morale, job satisfaction, intention to remain in the job, and consequent length of service for remote healthcare staff; (ii) how best to 'bundle' these strategies for different health workforce groups; and (iii) how these 'bundles' work in different service contexts. This paper describes a five-year implementation research program in partnership with twelve remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Community Controlled Health Services (ATSICCHS) in the Northern Territory and Queensland, Australia. Overall methodology follows a participatory action research approach which incorporates co-design and realist elements. The program comprises two broad phases involving evidence consolidation and synthesis (Phase 1), and co-design, implementation, and prospective evaluation of 'bundles' of retention strategies (Phase 2) to improve retention of healthcare staff in participating ATSICCHSs. This innovative research program has the potential to develop a comprehensive evidence base required to optimise health workforce retention in remote health services. This new evidence will strengthen understanding of what 'bundles' of retention strategies are effective, for which groups of employees, and how they work to improve staff retention.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Nowhere is optimising healthcare staff retention more important than in primary health care (PHC) settings in remote Australia, where there are unacceptably high rates of staff burnout and turnover. Ensuing consequences for the remote health services and the community are acute - staffing shortfalls in clinics; organisational instability; excessive costs associated with frequent staff recruitment and orientation; diminished access to PHC for patients in need; and lack of continuity of patient care; all of which further entrench poor health outcomes for the community. Optimising remote healthcare staff retention is critical in order to provide high quality and continued PHC. Currently, however, there is paucity of knowledge to inform targeted and effective retention strategies in remote health services. This research program seeks to develop a stronger evidence base to understand (i) what retention strategies are effective in improving morale, job satisfaction, intention to remain in the job, and consequent length of service for remote healthcare staff; (ii) how best to 'bundle' these strategies for different health workforce groups; and (iii) how these 'bundles' work in different service contexts.
METHODS
METHODS
This paper describes a five-year implementation research program in partnership with twelve remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Community Controlled Health Services (ATSICCHS) in the Northern Territory and Queensland, Australia. Overall methodology follows a participatory action research approach which incorporates co-design and realist elements. The program comprises two broad phases involving evidence consolidation and synthesis (Phase 1), and co-design, implementation, and prospective evaluation of 'bundles' of retention strategies (Phase 2) to improve retention of healthcare staff in participating ATSICCHSs.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
This innovative research program has the potential to develop a comprehensive evidence base required to optimise health workforce retention in remote health services. This new evidence will strengthen understanding of what 'bundles' of retention strategies are effective, for which groups of employees, and how they work to improve staff retention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39334066
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11629-1
pii: 10.1186/s12913-024-11629-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1115Subventions
Organisme : National Health and Medical Research Council
ID : 2015611
Organisme : Cooperative Research Centre for Developing Northern Australia
ID : H.5.2223005
Organisme : Medical Research Future Fund through Central Australia Academic Health Science Network
ID : RARUR000153
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance Framework: 2020 summary report. Canberra: AIHW; 2020.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Spatial variation in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people’s access to primary health care. Canberra: AIHW; 2015. Cat. no.: IHW 155.
Opie T, Dollard M, Lenthall S, Wakerman J, Dunn S, Knight S, et al. Levels of occupational stress in the remote area nursing workforce. Aust J Rural Health. 2010;18(6):235–41.
doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2010.01161.x
pubmed: 21114700
Lenthall S, Wakerman J, Dollard MF, Dunn S, Knight S, Opie T, et al. Reducing occupational stress among registered nurses in very remote Australia: a participatory action research approach. Collegian. 2018;25(2):181–91.
doi: 10.1016/j.colegn.2017.04.007
Russell DJ, Zhao Y, Guthridge S, Ramjan M, Jones MP, Humphreys JS, et al. Patterns of resident health workforce turnover and retention in remote communities of the Northern Territory of Australia, 2013–2015. Hum Resour Health. 2017;15:52.
doi: 10.1186/s12960-017-0229-9
pubmed: 28810919
pmcid: 5558760
Veginadu P, Russell DJ, Zhao Y, Guthridge S, Ramjan M, Jones MP, et al. Patterns of health workforce turnover and retention in Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services in remote communities of the Northern Territory and Western Australia, 2017–2019. Hum Resour Health. 2024;22:58.
doi: 10.1186/s12960-024-00942-9
pubmed: 39175025
pmcid: 11340071
Fitts MS, Russell D, Mathew S, Liddle Z, Mulholland E, Comerford C, et al. Remote health service vulnerabilities and responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Aust J Rural Health. 2020;28(6):613–7.
doi: 10.1111/ajr.12672
pubmed: 33216416
pmcid: 7753557
Northern Teritory Primary Health Network and Rural Workforce Agency NT. Health Workforce Needs Assessment; 2023.
House of Representatives Standing Committee on Regional Australia. Cancer of the bush or salvation for our cities? Fly-in, fly-out and drive-in, drive-out workforce practices in Regional Australia. Parliament of Australia; 2013.
Zhao Y, Russell DJ, Guthridge S, Ramjan M, Jones MP, Humphreys JS, et al. Costs and effects of higher turnover of nurses and Aboriginal health practitioners and higher use of short-term nurses in remote Australian primary care services: an observational cohort study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(2):e023906.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023906
pubmed: 30787082
pmcid: 6398713
van Walraven C, Oake N, Jennings A, Forster AJ. The association between continuity of care and outcomes: a systematic and critical review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16(5):947–56.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01235.x
pubmed: 20553366
Kroezen M, Dussault G, Craveiro I, Dieleman M, Jansen C, Buchan J, et al. Recruitment and retention of health professionals across Europe: a literature review and multiple case study research. Health Policy. 2015;119(12):1517–28.
doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.08.003
pubmed: 26324418
World Health Organization. Retention of the health workforce in rural and remote areas: a systematic review. Geneva: WHO; 2020.
Russell D, Mathew S, Fitts M, Liddle Z, Murakami-Gold L, Campbell N, et al. Interventions for health workforce retention in rural and remote areas: a systematic review. Hum Resour Health. 2021;19(1):103.
doi: 10.1186/s12960-021-00643-7
pubmed: 34446042
pmcid: 8393462
Wieland L, Ayton J, Abernethy G. Retention of General practitioners in remote areas of Canada and Australia: a meta-aggregation of qualitative research. Aust J Rural Health. 2021;29(5):656–69.
doi: 10.1111/ajr.12762
pubmed: 34496106
Humphreys J, Jones J, Jones M, Hugo G, Bamford E, Taylor D. A critical review of rural medical workforce retention in Australia. Aust Health Rev. 2001;24(4):91–102.
doi: 10.1071/AH010091a
pubmed: 11842721
Wakerman J, Humphreys J, Russell D, Guthridge S, Bourke L, Dunbar T, et al. Remote health workforce turnover and retention: what are the policy and practice priorities? Hum Resour Health. 2019;17(1):99.
doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0432-y
pubmed: 31842946
pmcid: 6915930
Humphreys J, Wakerman J, Pashen D, Buykx P. Retention strategies and incentives for health workers in rural and remote areas: what works? Canberra: Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute; 2009.
Pawson R, Tilley N. Realist evaluation. London: Sage Publications Ltd.,; 1997.
Department of Health and Aged Care. Modified Monash Model (MMM). 2019. [ https://www.health.gov.au/topics/rural-health-workforce/classifications/mmm
Applications. Case 2. In: Flynn TN, Louviere JJ, Marley AAJ, editors. Best-worst scaling: theory, methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015. pp. 189–90.
Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65–76.
doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
pubmed: 20957426
Russell DJ, Humphreys JS, Wakerman J. How best to measure health workforce turnover and retention: five key metrics. Aust Health Rev. 2012;36(3):290–5.
doi: 10.1071/AH11085
pubmed: 22935120
Johnson R, Orme B. Getting the most from CBC. Sequim: Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series. Sawtooth Software; 2003.
Hess S, Daly AJ. Handbook of choice modelling. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2014.
doi: 10.4337/9781781003152