Dissemination of colorectal cancer information among Hispanic patients and their social network.
Colorectal cancer screening
Health communication
Hispanic patients
Patient decision aids
Social network
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Sep 2024
27 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
19
04
2023
accepted:
16
09
2024
medline:
28
9
2024
pubmed:
28
9
2024
entrez:
28
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening decision aids can inform patients about CRC screening benefits, costs, and procedures. Patients who receive the decision aid report wanting to share the information with their families and friends. We evaluated a CRC screening decision aid on Hispanic patients' communication to their alters and whether patient-alter communication leads to alters' CRC screening intention. We conducted a one-arm pre/post study of Hispanic patients and their alters; patients (n = 42) and their alters (n = 19) were recruited from a clinic site in Yakima County, Washington State. Patients viewed a CRC screening decision aid at the clinic site. Survey data from patients and alters were collected via telephone including patients' communication with their alters about CRC screening after viewing the decision aid and alters' intention to be screened for CRC after talking to the patient. Most participants reported sharing CRC information with their alters after viewing the decision aid, and most alters confirmed they had received CRC information from participants (68%). The decision aid was associated with participants' own intention to undergo CRC screening and with alters' intention to be screened for CRC using a fecal occult blood test (p = 0.014) and sigmoidoscopy (p = 0.011). Patient decision aids have the potential to increase CRC screening behavior beyond the decision aid recipients to their social network. Trials Registration Number: NCT04444232 "Retrospectively registered."
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening decision aids can inform patients about CRC screening benefits, costs, and procedures. Patients who receive the decision aid report wanting to share the information with their families and friends. We evaluated a CRC screening decision aid on Hispanic patients' communication to their alters and whether patient-alter communication leads to alters' CRC screening intention.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a one-arm pre/post study of Hispanic patients and their alters; patients (n = 42) and their alters (n = 19) were recruited from a clinic site in Yakima County, Washington State. Patients viewed a CRC screening decision aid at the clinic site. Survey data from patients and alters were collected via telephone including patients' communication with their alters about CRC screening after viewing the decision aid and alters' intention to be screened for CRC after talking to the patient.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Most participants reported sharing CRC information with their alters after viewing the decision aid, and most alters confirmed they had received CRC information from participants (68%). The decision aid was associated with participants' own intention to undergo CRC screening and with alters' intention to be screened for CRC using a fecal occult blood test (p = 0.014) and sigmoidoscopy (p = 0.011).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Patient decision aids have the potential to increase CRC screening behavior beyond the decision aid recipients to their social network.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
Trials Registration Number: NCT04444232 "Retrospectively registered."
Identifiants
pubmed: 39334118
doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20095-7
pii: 10.1186/s12889-024-20095-7
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04444232']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2616Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Health Center Program. Uniform Data System (UDS) clinical quality measures and healthy people 2030 objectives and benchmarks. Available from: https://bphc.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/bphc/data-reporting/uds-cqm-benchmarks.pdf .
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Use of colorectal cancer screening tests. 2024. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/statistics/use-screening-tests-BRFSS.htm .
Acuna-Villaorduna AR, Lin J, Kim M, Goel S. Racial/ethnic disparities in early-onset colorectal cancer: implications for a racial/ethnic-specific screening strategy. Cancer Med. 2021;10(6):2080–7.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.3811
pubmed: 33641251
pmcid: 7957207
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cancer mortality trends among men by race/ethnicity; 2016. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/dcpc/data/trends/men_mortality.htm .
May FP, Yang L, Corona E, Glenn BA, Bastani R. Disparities in colorectal cancer screening in the United States before and after implementation of the Affordable Care Act. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(8):1796–804.
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.09.008
pubmed: 31525514
Spencer JC, Noel L, Shokar NK, Pignone MP. Understanding the role of access in Hispanic cancer screening disparities. Cancer. 2023;129(10):1569–78.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.34696
pubmed: 36787126
Vickers NJ. Animal communication: when I’m calling you, will you answer too? Curr Biol. 2017;27(14):R713–5.
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.064
pubmed: 28743020
Brenner AT, Hoffman R, McWilliams A, Pignone MP, Rhyne RL, Tapp H, et al. Colorectal cancer screening in vulnerable patients: promoting informed and shared decisions. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(4):454–62.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.03.025
pubmed: 27242081
pmcid: 5501711
Reuland DS, Ko LK, Fernandez A, Braswell LC, Pignone M. Testing a Spanish-language colorectal cancer screening decision aid in Latinos with limited English proficiency: results from a pre-post trial and four month follow-up survey. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12(1):1–8.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-53
Reuland DS, Brenner AT, Hoffman R, McWilliams A, Rhyne RL, Getrich C, Tapp H, Weaver MA, Callan D, Cubillos L, de Hernandez BU. Effect of combined patient decision aid and patient navigation vs usual care for colorectal cancer screening in a vulnerable patient population: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(7):967–74.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1294
pubmed: 28505217
pmcid: 5710456
Ko LK, Reuland DS, Roque K, Rodriguez R, Pignone M. Information processing of a Spanish language patient decision aid among Latinos with limited English proficiency, presented at the Society for Behavioral Medicine. 2012.
Miller DP Jr, Spangler JG, Case LD, Goff DC Jr, Singh S, Pignone MP. Effectiveness of a web-based colorectal cancer screening patient decision aid: a randomized controlled trial in a mixed-literacy population. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(6):608–15.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.019
pubmed: 21565651
pmcid: 3480321
Volk RJ, Linder SK, Lopez-Olivo MA, Kamath GR, Reuland DS, Saraykar SS, et al. Patient decision aids for colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(5):779–91.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.06.022
pubmed: 27593418
pmcid: 5067222
McGuire WJ. Attitudes and attitude change. In: Lindzey G, Aronson E, editors. The Handbook of Social Psychology. Mahwah, NJ.: Erlbaum; 1985. p. 223–346.
McGuire WJ. Input and output variables currently promising for constructing persuasive communications. In: Rice RE, Atkin CK, editors. Public Communication Campaigns. 3rd ed. thousand Oaks: Sage; 2001. p. 22–48.
doi: 10.4135/9781452233260.n2
Heaney CA, Israel BA. Social networks and social support. Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice. 2008.
Kreuter MW, Wray RJ. Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav. 2003;27(1):S227–32.
doi: 10.5993/AJHB.27.1.s3.6
pubmed: 14672383
Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Serrano A, Gonzales FA, Fernandez NC, Cabling ML, Kaltman S. Trauma-exposed Latina immigrants’ networks: A social network analysis approach. J Lat Psychol. 2016;4(4):232.
pubmed: 28078194
Marquez B, Elder J, Arredondo E, Madanat H, Ji M, Ayala G. Social network characteristics associated with health promoting behaviors among Latinos. Health Psychol. 2014;33(6):544–53.
doi: 10.1037/hea0000092
pubmed: 24884908
pmcid: 10005843
Rote S, Angel JL, Markides KS, Hill TD. Neighborhood cohesion and caregiver well-being among the Mexican-origin population. In: Hill TD, Markides K, editors. Contextualizing health and aging in the Americas: effects of space, time and place. 2019. p. 295–310.
Bowen DJ, Sorensen G, Weiner BJ, Campbell M, Emmons K, Melvin C. Dissemination research in cancer control: where are we and where should we go? Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20(4):473–85.
doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9308-0
pubmed: 19224380
pmcid: 2915900
Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus AC. Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(8):1261–7.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.93.8.1261
pubmed: 12893608
pmcid: 1447950
Glasgow RE, Emmons KM. How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:413–33.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144145
pubmed: 17150029
Washington State Employment Security Department. Yakima County Profile; 2022. Available from: https://esd.wa.gov/labormarketinfo/county-profiles/yakima#:~:text=According%20to%20US%20Census%20population,Washington%20state%20(13.0%20percent .
Ko LK, Reuland D, Jolles M, Clay R, Pignone M. Cultural and linguistic adaptation of a multimedia colorectal cancer screening decision aid for Spanish-speaking Latinos. J Health Commun. 2014;19(2):192–209.
doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.811325
pubmed: 24328496
Power E, Van Jaarsveld CH, McCaffery K, Miles A, Atkin W, Wardle J. Understanding intentions and action in colorectal cancer screening. Ann Behav Med. 2008;35(3):285–94.
doi: 10.1007/s12160-008-9034-y
pubmed: 18575946
Jones KO, Denham BE, Springston JK. Differing effects of mass and interpersonal communication on breast cancer risk estimates: An exploratory study of college students and their mothers. Health Commun. 2007;21(2):165–75.
doi: 10.1080/10410230701307253
pubmed: 17523862
Katz ML, James AS, Pignone MP, Hudson MA, Jackson E, Oates V, et al. Colorectal cancer screening among African American church members: a qualitative and quantitative study of patient–provider communication. BMC Public Health. 2004;4(1):62–70.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-4-62
pubmed: 15601463
pmcid: 544572
Madlensky L, Esplen MJ, Gallinger S, McLaughlin JR, Goel V. Relatives of colorectal cancer patients: factors associated with screening behavior. Am J Prev Med. 2003;25(3):187–94.
doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(03)00202-2
pubmed: 14507524
Yoo W, Kwon MW, Pfeiffer LJ. Influence of communication on colorectal cancer screening: Revisiting the Health Belief Model. J Commun Health. 2013;6(1):35–43.
doi: 10.1179/1753807612Y.0000000023
Cutrona SL, Roblin DW, Wagner JL, Gaglio B, Williams AE, Stone RT, Mazor KM. Adult willingness to use email and social media for peer-to-peer cancer screening communication: quantitative interview study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2013;2(2): e52.
doi: 10.2196/resprot.2886
pubmed: 24287495
pmcid: 3868965
Pew Research Center. Internet and technology. Social Media Fact Sheet. 2019. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/ .
Elder JP, Ayala GX, Campbell NR, Slymen D, Lopez-Madurga ET, Engelberg M, Baquero B. Interpersonal and print nutrition communication for a Spanish-dominant Latino population: secretos de la Buena Vida. Health Psychol. 2005;24(1):49–57.
doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.1.49
pubmed: 15631562
Inclan J. Understanding Hispanic Families: A Curriculum Outline. J Syst Ther. 1990;9(3):64–82.
Perestelo-Perez L, Rivero-Santana A, Torres-Castaño A, Ramos-Garcia V, Alvarez-Perez Y, Gonzalez-Hernandez N, et al. Effectiveness of a decision aid for promoting colorectal cancer screening in Spain: a randomized trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019;19:1–9.
doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0739-6
Schroy PC III, Emmons KM, Peters E, Glick JT, Robinson PA, Lydotes MA, et al. Aid-assisted decision making and colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(6):573–83.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.08.018
pubmed: 23159252
pmcid: 3966107
USPSTF. Final Recommendation Statement Colorectal Cancer: Screening; 2021. Available from: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/colorectal-cancer-screening .
Patel SG, May FP, Anderson JC, Burke CA, Dominitz JA, Gross SA, et al. Updates on age to start and stop colorectal cancer screening: recommendations from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2022;162(1):285–99.
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.10.007
pubmed: 34794816
Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM, Cabana M, Caughey AB, Davis EM, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2021;325(19):1965–77.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6238
pubmed: 34003218
Knudsen AB, Rutter CM, Peterse EF, Lietz AP, Seguin CL, Meester RG, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: an updated modeling study for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2021;325(19):1998–2011.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.5746
pubmed: 34003219
pmcid: 8409520