A multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare the efficacy of goal-directed tranexamic acid administration based on viscoelastic test versus preemptive tranexamic acid administration on postoperative bleeding in cardiovascular surgery (GDT trial).
Humans
Tranexamic Acid
/ administration & dosage
Double-Blind Method
Antifibrinolytic Agents
/ administration & dosage
Thrombelastography
Postoperative Hemorrhage
/ prevention & control
Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Equivalence Trials as Topic
Female
Male
Cardiac surgery
Clinical trial
Goal-directed
Rotational thromboelastometry
Tranexamic acid
Viscoelastic test
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Sep 2024
27 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
10
04
2024
accepted:
16
09
2024
medline:
28
9
2024
pubmed:
28
9
2024
entrez:
28
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Tranexamic acid (TXA) effectively attenuates hyperfibrinolysis and preemptive administration has been employed to reduce bleeding and blood transfusions in various surgical settings. However, TXA administration could be associated with adverse effects, such as seizures and thromboembolic risks. While patients with fibrinolysis shutdown showed greater thromboembolic complications and mortality, TXA administration may aggravate the degree of shutdown in these patients. Selective TXA administration based on the results of rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) would be non-inferior to preemptive TXA administration in reducing postoperative bleeding and beneficial in reducing its risks in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. This non-inferiority, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial will be performed in 3 tertiary university hospitals from August 2023 to March 2025. Seven hundred sixty-four patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery will be randomly allocated to get TXA as a preemptive (Group-P) or goal-directed strategy (Group-GDT) in each institution (with a 1:1 allocation ratio). After anesthesia induction, TXA (10 mg/kg and 2 mg/kg/h) and a placebo are administered after anesthesia induction in Group-P and Group-GDT, respectively. ROTEM tests are performed immediately before weaning from CPB and at the considerable bleeding post-CPB period. After getting the test results, a placebo is administered in Group-P (regardless of the test results). In Group-GDT, placebo or TXA is administered according to the results: placebo is administered if the amplitude at 10 min (A10-EXTEM) is ≥ 40 mm and lysis within 60 min (LI60-EXTEM) of EXTEM assay is ≥ 85%, or TXA (20 mg/kg) is administered if A10-EXTEM is < 40 mm or LI60-EXTEM is < 85%. The primary outcome is inter-group comparisons of postoperative bleeding (for 24 h). The secondary measures include comparisons of perioperative blood transfusion, coagulation profiles, reoperation, thromboembolic complications, seizures, in-hospital mortality, fibrinolysis phenotypes, and hospital costs. The absence of inter-group differences in postoperative bleeding would support the selective strategy's non-inferiority in reducing postoperative bleeding in these patients. The possible reduction in thromboembolic risks, seizures, and fibrinolysis shutdown in Group-GDT would support its superiority in reducing TXA-induced adverse events and the cost of their management. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the registration number NCT05806346 on March 28, 2023. recruiting. Issue date: 2023 March 28 (by Tae-Yop Kim, MD, PhD). The trial was registered in the clinical registration on March 28, 2023 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05806346) and revised to the latest version of its protocol (version no. 8, August 26, 2024) approved by the institutional review boards (IRBs) of all 3 university hospitals (Konkuk University Medical Center, 2023-07-005-001, Asan Medical Center, 2023-0248, and Samsung Medical Center, SMC 2023-06-048-002). Its recruitment was started on August 1, 2023, and will be completed on December 31, 2024. Protocol amendment number: 08 (protocol version 08, August 26, 2024). Revision chronology: 2023 March 28:Original. 2023 April 10:Amendment No 01. The primary reason for the amendment is the modification of Arms (adding one arm for sub-group analyses) and Interventions, Outcome Measures, Study Design, Study Description, Study Status, Eligibility, and Study Identification. 2023 May 03:Amendment No 02. The primary reason for the amendment is to modify the Outcome Measures and update the study status. 2023 July 06:Amendment No 03. The primary reason for amendment is to update the chronological study status. 2023 July 07:Amendment No 04. The primary reason for the amendment is the modification of study information (the treatment category was changed to diagnostic, and Phase 4 was changed to not applicable) and a chronological update on the study status. 2023 September 12:Amendment No 06. The primary reason for the amendment is a chronological update in the study status and the inclusion of additional information regarding contacts/locations and oversight. 2023 December 29:Amendment No 07. The primary reason for the amendment is to modify the outcome measures (including detailed information on outcome measures, addition of extra secondary measures, and chronological updates in study status). 2024 August 26:Amendment No 08. The primary reason for the amendment is to add detailed descriptions regarding data handling and the names and roles of the participating institutions and to update the chronological process of the trial.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Tranexamic acid (TXA) effectively attenuates hyperfibrinolysis and preemptive administration has been employed to reduce bleeding and blood transfusions in various surgical settings. However, TXA administration could be associated with adverse effects, such as seizures and thromboembolic risks. While patients with fibrinolysis shutdown showed greater thromboembolic complications and mortality, TXA administration may aggravate the degree of shutdown in these patients. Selective TXA administration based on the results of rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) would be non-inferior to preemptive TXA administration in reducing postoperative bleeding and beneficial in reducing its risks in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.
METHODS
METHODS
This non-inferiority, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial will be performed in 3 tertiary university hospitals from August 2023 to March 2025. Seven hundred sixty-four patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery will be randomly allocated to get TXA as a preemptive (Group-P) or goal-directed strategy (Group-GDT) in each institution (with a 1:1 allocation ratio). After anesthesia induction, TXA (10 mg/kg and 2 mg/kg/h) and a placebo are administered after anesthesia induction in Group-P and Group-GDT, respectively. ROTEM tests are performed immediately before weaning from CPB and at the considerable bleeding post-CPB period. After getting the test results, a placebo is administered in Group-P (regardless of the test results). In Group-GDT, placebo or TXA is administered according to the results: placebo is administered if the amplitude at 10 min (A10-EXTEM) is ≥ 40 mm and lysis within 60 min (LI60-EXTEM) of EXTEM assay is ≥ 85%, or TXA (20 mg/kg) is administered if A10-EXTEM is < 40 mm or LI60-EXTEM is < 85%. The primary outcome is inter-group comparisons of postoperative bleeding (for 24 h). The secondary measures include comparisons of perioperative blood transfusion, coagulation profiles, reoperation, thromboembolic complications, seizures, in-hospital mortality, fibrinolysis phenotypes, and hospital costs.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
The absence of inter-group differences in postoperative bleeding would support the selective strategy's non-inferiority in reducing postoperative bleeding in these patients. The possible reduction in thromboembolic risks, seizures, and fibrinolysis shutdown in Group-GDT would support its superiority in reducing TXA-induced adverse events and the cost of their management.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the registration number NCT05806346 on March 28, 2023.
TRIAL STATUS
METHODS
recruiting. Issue date: 2023 March 28 (by Tae-Yop Kim, MD, PhD). The trial was registered in the clinical registration on March 28, 2023 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05806346) and revised to the latest version of its protocol (version no. 8, August 26, 2024) approved by the institutional review boards (IRBs) of all 3 university hospitals (Konkuk University Medical Center, 2023-07-005-001, Asan Medical Center, 2023-0248, and Samsung Medical Center, SMC 2023-06-048-002). Its recruitment was started on August 1, 2023, and will be completed on December 31, 2024. Protocol amendment number: 08 (protocol version 08, August 26, 2024). Revision chronology: 2023 March 28:Original. 2023 April 10:Amendment No 01. The primary reason for the amendment is the modification of Arms (adding one arm for sub-group analyses) and Interventions, Outcome Measures, Study Design, Study Description, Study Status, Eligibility, and Study Identification. 2023 May 03:Amendment No 02. The primary reason for the amendment is to modify the Outcome Measures and update the study status. 2023 July 06:Amendment No 03. The primary reason for amendment is to update the chronological study status. 2023 July 07:Amendment No 04. The primary reason for the amendment is the modification of study information (the treatment category was changed to diagnostic, and Phase 4 was changed to not applicable) and a chronological update on the study status. 2023 September 12:Amendment No 06. The primary reason for the amendment is a chronological update in the study status and the inclusion of additional information regarding contacts/locations and oversight. 2023 December 29:Amendment No 07. The primary reason for the amendment is to modify the outcome measures (including detailed information on outcome measures, addition of extra secondary measures, and chronological updates in study status). 2024 August 26:Amendment No 08. The primary reason for the amendment is to add detailed descriptions regarding data handling and the names and roles of the participating institutions and to update the chronological process of the trial.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39334224
doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08467-1
pii: 10.1186/s13063-024-08467-1
doi:
Substances chimiques
Tranexamic Acid
6T84R30KC1
Antifibrinolytic Agents
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05806346']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Clinical Trial Protocol
Comparative Study
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
623Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Engelman DT, Ben Ali W, Williams JB, Perrault LP, Reddy VS, Arora RC, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in cardiac surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery society recommendations. Jama Surg. 2019;154(8):755–66.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1153
pubmed: 31054241
Pagano D, Milojevic M, Meesters MI, Benedetto U, Bolliger D, von Heymann C, et al. 2017 EACTS/EACTA guidelines on patient blood management for adult cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;53(1):79–111.
doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx325
pubmed: 29029100
Taeuber I, Weibel S, Herrmann E, Neef V, Schlesinger T, Kranke P, et al. Association of intravenous tranexamic acid with thromboembolic events and mortality: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Jama Surg. 2021;156(6): e210884.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0884
pubmed: 33851983
pmcid: 8047805
HALT-IT Trial Collaborators. Effects of a high-dose 24-h infusion of tranexamic acid on death and thromboembolic events in patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding (HALT-IT): an international randomised, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial. Lancet. 2020;395(10241):1927–36.
Morrison JJ, Dubose JJ, Rasmussen TE, Midwinter MJ. Military Application of Tranexamic Acid in Trauma Emergency Resuscitation (MATTERs) study. Arch Surg. 2012;147(2):113–9.
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.287
pubmed: 22006852
Cole E, Davenport R, Willett K, Brohi K. Tranexamic acid use in severely injured civilian patients and the effects on outcomes: a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg. 2015;261(2):390–4.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000717
pubmed: 25412319
Roberts I, Perel P, Prieto-Merino D, Shakur H, Coats T, Hunt BJ, et al. Effect of tranexamic acid on mortality in patients with traumatic bleeding: prespecified analysis of data from randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2012;345: e5839.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5839
pubmed: 22968527
pmcid: 3439642
Myles PS, Smith JA, Forbes A, Silbert B, Jayarajah M, Painter T, et al. Tranexamic acid in patients undergoing coronary-artery surgery. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(2):136–48.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606424
pubmed: 27774838
Shi J, Zhou C, Pan W, Sun H, Liu S, Feng W, et al. Effect of high- vs low-dose tranexamic acid infusion on need for red blood cell transfusion and adverse events in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: the OPTIMAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022;328(4):336–47.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.10725
pubmed: 35881121
pmcid: 9327582
Guo J, Gao X, Ma Y, Lv H, Hu W, Zhang S, et al. Different dose regimes and administration methods of tranexamic acid in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19(1):129.
doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0772-0
pubmed: 31307381
pmcid: 6631782
Ageron FX, Gayet-Ageron A, Ker K, Coats TJ, Shakur-Still H, Roberts I, Antifibrinolytics TC. Effect of tranexamic acid by baseline risk of death in acute bleeding patients: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data from 28 333 patients. Br J Anaesth. 2020;124(6):676–83.
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.01.020
pubmed: 32199584
pmcid: 7271662
Moore HB, Moore EE, Huebner BR, Stettler GR, Nunns GR, Einersen PM, et al. Tranexamic acid is associated with increased mortality in patients with physiological fibrinolysis. J Surg Res. 2017;220:438–43.
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.04.028
pubmed: 28755903
pmcid: 5677580
Meizoso JP, Karcutskie CA, Ray JJ, Namias N, Schulman CI, Proctor KG. Persistent fibrinolysis shutdown is associated with increased mortality in severely injured trauma patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224(4):575–82.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.018
pubmed: 28017804
Richards JE, Fedeles BT, Chow JH, Morrison JJ, Renner C, Trinh AT, et al. Is tranexamic acid associated with mortality or multiple organ failure following severe injury? Shock. 2021;55(1):55–60.
doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001608
pubmed: 33337787
David JS, Lambert A, Bouzat P, Incagnoli P, Geay-Baillat AM, Taverna XJ, et al. Fibrinolytic shutdown diagnosed with rotational thromboelastometry represents a moderate form of coagulopathy associated with transfusion requirement and mortality: a retrospective analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020;37(3):170–9.
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001096
pubmed: 31567468
Moore HB, Moore EE, Chapman MP, Hansen KC, Cohen MJ, Pieracci FM, et al. Does tranexamic acid improve clot strength in severely injured patients who have elevated fibrin degradation products and low fibrinolytic activity, measured by thrombelastography? J Am Coll Surg. 2019;229(1):92–101.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.03.015
pubmed: 30936005
pmcid: 6874093
Moore EE, Moore HB, Gonzalez E, Sauaia A, Banerjee A, Silliman CC. Rationale for the selective administration of tranexamic acid to inhibit fibrinolysis in the severely injured patient. Transfusion. 2016;56 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S110-4.
pubmed: 27100746
Moore HB, Moore EE, Gonzalez E, Hansen KC, Dzieciatkowska M, Chapman MP, et al. Hemolysis exacerbates hyperfibrinolysis, whereas platelolysis shuts down fibrinolysis: evolving concepts of the spectrum of fibrinolysis in response to severe injury. Shock. 2015;43(1):39–46.
doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000245
pubmed: 25072794
pmcid: 4373619
Levrat A, Gros A, Rugeri L, Inaba K, Floccard B, Negrier C, David JS. Evaluation of rotation thrombelastography for the diagnosis of hyperfibrinolysis in trauma patients. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100(6):792–7.
doi: 10.1093/bja/aen083
pubmed: 18440953
Tibi P, McClure RS, Huang J, Baker RA, Fitzgerald D, Mazer CD, et al. STS/SCA/AmSECT/SABM update to the clinical practice guidelines on patient blood management. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;112(3):981–1004.
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.03.033
pubmed: 34217505
Gorlinger K, Perez-Ferrer A, Dirkmann D, Saner F, Maegele M, Calatayud AAP, Kim TY. The role of evidence-based algorithms for rotational thromboelastometry-guided bleeding management. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019;72(4):297–322.
doi: 10.4097/kja.19169
pubmed: 31096732
pmcid: 6676023
Zufferey PJ, Lanoiselée J, Graouch B, Vieille B, Delavenne X, Ollier E. Exposure-response relationship of tranexamic acid in cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2021;134(2):165–78.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003633
pubmed: 33316069
Kietaibl S, Ahmed A, Afshari A, Albaladejo P, Aldecoa C, Barauskas G, et al. Management of severe peri-operative bleeding: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care: second update 2022. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2023;40(4):226–304.
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001803
pubmed: 36855941
Yan X, Lee S, Li N. Missing data handling methods in medical device clinical trials. J Biopharm Stat. 2009;19(6):1085–98.
doi: 10.1080/10543400903243009
pubmed: 20183466
Starzl TE, Marchioro TL, Vonkaulla KN, Hermann G, Brittain RS, Waddell WR. Homotransplantation of the liver in humans. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1963;117:659–76.
pubmed: 14100514
pmcid: 2634660
Groth CG, Pechet L, Starzl TE. Coagulation during and after orthotopic transplantation of the human liver. Arch Surg. 1969;98(1):31–4.
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1969.01340070049006
pubmed: 4882567
pmcid: 2956505
Hardaway RM, Drake DC. Prevention of “irreversible” hemorrhagic shock with fibrinolysin. Ann Surg. 1963;157(1):39–47.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-196301000-00004
pubmed: 13952730
pmcid: 1466408
Fergusson DA, Hebert PC, Mazer CD, Fremes S, MacAdams C, Murkin JM, et al. A comparison of aprotinin and lysine analogues in high-risk cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(22):2319–31.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802395
pubmed: 18480196
Sharma V, Katznelson R, Jerath A, Garrido-Olivares L, Carroll J, Rao V, et al. The association between tranexamic acid and convulsive seizures after cardiac surgery: a multivariate analysis in 11 529 patients. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(2):124–30.
doi: 10.1111/anae.12516
pubmed: 24588023
Couture P, Lebon JS, Laliberté É, Desjardins G, Chamberland M, Ayoub C, et al. Low-dose versus high-dose tranexamic acid reduces the risk of nonischemic seizures after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017;31(5):1611–7.
doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.04.026
pubmed: 28803773
Lin Z, Xiaoyi Z. Tranexamic acid-associated seizures: a meta-analysis. Seizure. 2016;36:70–3.
doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.02.011
pubmed: 26967164
Sigaut S, Tremey B, Ouattara A, Couturier R, Taberlet C, Grassin-Delyle S, et al. Comparison of two doses of tranexamic acid in adults undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesthesiology. 2014;120(3):590–600.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a443e8
pubmed: 23903022
Moore HB, Moore EE, Gonzalez E, Chapman MP, Chin TL, Silliman CC, et al. Hyperfibrinolysis, physiologic fibrinolysis, and fibrinolysis shutdown: the spectrum of postinjury fibrinolysis and relevance to antifibrinolytic therapy. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77(6):811–7 discussion 7.
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000341
pubmed: 25051384
pmcid: 4370273
Meizoso JP, Dudaryk R, Mulder MB, Ray JJ, Karcutskie CA, Eidelson SA, et al. Increased risk of fibrinolysis shutdown among severely injured trauma patients receiving tranexamic acid. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;84(3):426–32.
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001792
pubmed: 29298240
Stettler GR, Moore EE, Moore HB, Nunns GR, Silliman CC, Banerjee A, Sauaia A. Redefining postinjury fibrinolysis phenotypes using two viscoelastic assays. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019;86(4):679–85.
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002165
pubmed: 30562328
pmcid: 6870942
Meco M, Montisci A, Giustiniano E, Greco M, Pappalardo F, Mammana L, et al. Viscoelastic blood tests use in adult cardiac surgery: meta-analysis, meta-regression, and trial sequential analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020;34(1):119–27.
doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.06.030
pubmed: 31445833
Gomez-Builes JC, Acuna SA, Nascimento B, Madotto F, Rizoli SB. Harmful or physiologic: diagnosing fibrinolysis shutdown in a trauma cohort with rotational thromboelastometry. Anesth Analg. 2018;127(4):840–9.
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003341
pubmed: 29683829
pmcid: 6135473