Identification of quantitative trait loci for lodging and related agronomic traits in soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.).
Candidate genes
Lodging
Lodging related traits
Quantitative trait loci
Soybean
Journal
BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Sep 2024
30 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
23
02
2024
accepted:
11
09
2024
medline:
1
10
2024
pubmed:
1
10
2024
entrez:
30
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lodging, a crucial agronomic trait linked to soybean yield, poses a significant challenge in soybean production. Nevertheless, there has been less research on soybean lodging compared to other important agronomic traits, hindering progress in breeding high-yield soybeans. Our goals were to investigate lodging, pinpoint quantitative trait loci (QTL) linked to lodging, and forecast potential candidate genes linked to this trait. To achieve this, we employed a recombinant inbred line (RIL) population derived from a cross between Guizao 1 and B13 (GB) across various environments. The lodging score of the RIL population was found to be significantly positively correlated with flowering time, maturity time, plant height, number of main stem nodes, stem diameter, and internode length, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.457 to 0.783. A total of 84 QTLs associated with soybean lodging and related traits were identified using the GB population. The contribution of phenotypic variance ranged from 1.26 to 66.87%, with LOD scores ranging from 2.52 to 69.22. Additionally, within these QTLs, a stable major QTL associated with lodging was newly discovered in the GB population. Out of the ten major QTLs associated with other related traits, nine of them were situated within the qLD-4-1 interval of the major lodging score locus, displaying phenotypic variations ranging from 12.10 to 66.87%. Specific alterations in gene expression were revealed through the analysis of resequencing data from the two parental lines, potentially indicating their significant roles in lodging. Subsequently, it was determined through qRT-PCR that four genes are likely to be the major genes controlling soybean lodging. This study's findings offer valuable insights into the genetic underpinnings of soybean lodging resistance traits. By comprehending the potential genetic factors associated with lodging, this research lays the groundwork for breeding high-yield soybeans with improved lodging resistance.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Lodging, a crucial agronomic trait linked to soybean yield, poses a significant challenge in soybean production. Nevertheless, there has been less research on soybean lodging compared to other important agronomic traits, hindering progress in breeding high-yield soybeans. Our goals were to investigate lodging, pinpoint quantitative trait loci (QTL) linked to lodging, and forecast potential candidate genes linked to this trait. To achieve this, we employed a recombinant inbred line (RIL) population derived from a cross between Guizao 1 and B13 (GB) across various environments.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The lodging score of the RIL population was found to be significantly positively correlated with flowering time, maturity time, plant height, number of main stem nodes, stem diameter, and internode length, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.457 to 0.783. A total of 84 QTLs associated with soybean lodging and related traits were identified using the GB population. The contribution of phenotypic variance ranged from 1.26 to 66.87%, with LOD scores ranging from 2.52 to 69.22. Additionally, within these QTLs, a stable major QTL associated with lodging was newly discovered in the GB population. Out of the ten major QTLs associated with other related traits, nine of them were situated within the qLD-4-1 interval of the major lodging score locus, displaying phenotypic variations ranging from 12.10 to 66.87%. Specific alterations in gene expression were revealed through the analysis of resequencing data from the two parental lines, potentially indicating their significant roles in lodging. Subsequently, it was determined through qRT-PCR that four genes are likely to be the major genes controlling soybean lodging.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study's findings offer valuable insights into the genetic underpinnings of soybean lodging resistance traits. By comprehending the potential genetic factors associated with lodging, this research lays the groundwork for breeding high-yield soybeans with improved lodging resistance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39350068
doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10794-1
pii: 10.1186/s12864-024-10794-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
900Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Dong L, Fang C, Cheng Q, Su T, Kou K, Kong L, Zhang C, Li H, Hou Z, Zhang Y, et al. Genetic basis and adaptation trajectory of soybean from its temperate origin to tropics. NAT COMMUN. 2021;12(1):5445.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25800-3
pubmed: 34521854
pmcid: 8440769
Zhou Z, Jiang Y, Wang Z, Gou Z, Lyu J, Li W, Yu Y, Shu L, Zhao Y, Ma Y, et al. Resequencing 302 wild and cultivated accessions identifies genes related to domestication and improvement in soybean. NAT BIOTECHNOL. 2015;33(4):408–14.
doi: 10.1038/nbt.3096
pubmed: 25643055
Ray DK, Mueller ND, West PC, Foley JA. Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):e66428.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066428
pubmed: 23840465
pmcid: 3686737
Liu S, Zhang M, Feng F, Tian Z. Toward a Green Revolution for soybean. MOL PLANT. 2020;13(5):688–97.
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.03.002
pubmed: 32171732
Arachis hypogaea L.). THEOR APPL GENET 2023, 136(5):105.
Kumar J, Gupta DS, Gupta S, Dubey S, Gupta P, Kumar S. Quantitative trait loci from identification to exploitation for crop improvement. PLANT CELL REP. 2017;36(8):1187–213.
doi: 10.1007/s00299-017-2127-y
pubmed: 28352970
Des Marais DL, Razzaque S, Hernandez KM, Garvin DF, Juenger TE. Quantitative trait loci associated with natural diversity in water-use efficiency and response to soil drying in Brachypodium distachyon. PLANT SCI. 2016;251:2–11.
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.03.010
pubmed: 27593458
THEOR APPL GENET 1990, 79(4):465–469.
Kushanov FN, Turaev OS, Ernazarova DK, Gapparov BM, Oripova BB, Kudratova MK, Rafieva FU, Khalikov KK, Erjigitov DS, Khidirov MT, et al. Genetic diversity, QTL mapping, and marker-assisted Selection Technology in Cotton (Gossypium spp). FRONT PLANT SCI. 2021;12:779386.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.779386
pubmed: 34975965
pmcid: 8716771
Sahu BB, Sumit R, Srivastava SK, Bhattacharyya MK. Sequence based polymorphic (SBP) marker technology for targeted genomic regions: its application in generating a molecular map of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:20.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-20
pubmed: 22244314
pmcid: 3323429
Kumar LS. DNA markers in plant improvement: an overview. BIOTECHNOL ADV. 1999;17(2–3):143–82.
doi: 10.1016/S0734-9750(98)00018-4
pubmed: 14538138
Kantety RV, La Rota M, Matthews DE, Sorrells ME. Data mining for simple sequence repeats in expressed sequence tags from barley, maize, rice, sorghum and wheat. PLANT MOL BIOL. 2002;48(5–6):501–10.
doi: 10.1023/A:1014875206165
pubmed: 11999831
Karp A, Edwards KJ, Bruford M, Funk S, Vosman B, Morgante M, Seberg O, Kremer A, Boursot P, Arctander P, et al. Molecular technologies for biodiversity evaluation: opportunities and challenges. NAT BIOTECHNOL. 1997;15(7):625–8.
doi: 10.1038/nbt0797-625
pubmed: 9219262
Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, et al. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. NUCLEIC ACIDS RES. 1995;23(21):4407–14.
doi: 10.1093/nar/23.21.4407
pubmed: 7501463
pmcid: 307397
THEOR APPL GENET 1989, 77(3):353–359.
Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. AM J HUM GENET. 1980;32(3):314–31.
pubmed: 6247908
pmcid: 1686077
Stolting KN, Nipper R, Lindtke D, Caseys C, Waeber S, Castiglione S, Lexer C. Genomic scan for single nucleotide polymorphisms reveals patterns of divergence and gene flow between ecologically divergent species. MOL ECOL. 2013;22(3):842–55.
doi: 10.1111/mec.12011
pubmed: 22967258
Ganal MW, Altmann T, Roder MS. SNP identification in crop plants. CURR OPIN PLANT BIOL. 2009;12(2):211–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.12.009
pubmed: 19186095
Berraies S, Cuthbert R, Knox R, Singh A, DePauw R, Ruan Y, Bokore F, Henriquez MA, Kumar S, Burt A, et al. High-density genetic mapping of Fusarium head blight resistance and agronomic traits in spring wheat. FRONT PLANT SCI. 2023;14:1134132.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1134132
pubmed: 37284725
pmcid: 10241073
Gao F, Wen W, Liu J, Rasheed A, Yin G, Xia X, Wu X, He Z. Genome-wide linkage mapping of QTL for Yield Components, Plant Height and Yield-related physiological traits in the Chinese Wheat Cross Zhou 8425B/Chinese Spring. FRONT PLANT SCI. 2015;6:1099.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01099
pubmed: 26734019
pmcid: 4683206
Sun CY, Yang YM, Jia L, Liu XQ, Xu HQ, Lv HY, Huang ZW, Zhang D. QTL mapping of the genetic basis of stem diameter in soybean. Planta. 2021;253(5):109.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-021-03628-x
pubmed: 33871705
Lee S, Jun TH, Michel AP, Rouf Mian MA. SNP markers linked to QTL conditioning plant height, lodging, and maturity in soybean. Euphytica. 2015;203(3):521–32.
doi: 10.1007/s10681-014-1252-8
Lolium multiflorum Lam.). THEOR APPL GENET 2004, 109(8):1576–1585.
Tar’An B, Warkentin T, Somers DJ, Miranda D, Vandenberg A, Blade S, Woods S, Bing D, Xue A, DeKoeyer D et al: Quantitative trait loci for lodging resistance, plant height and partial resistance to mycosphaerella blight in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). THEOR APPL GENET 2003, 107(8):1482-1491.
Glycine max L. Merr. THEOR APPL GENET. 1993;86(8):914–8.
doi: 10.1007/BF00211041
THEOR APPL GENET 1996, 92(5):516–523.
Orf JH, Chase K, Adler FR, Mansur LM, Lark KG. Genetics of soybean agronomic traits: II. Interactions between Yield Quantitative Trait Loci in soybean. CROP SCI. 1999;39(6):1652–7.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1999.3961652x
Specht JE, Chase K, Macrander M, Graef GL, Chung J, Markwell JP, Germann M, Orf JH, Lark KG. Soybean response to Water: a QTL analysis of Drought Tolerance. CROP SCI. 2001;41(2):493–509.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2001.412493x
Chapman A, Pantalone VR, Ustun A, Allen FL, Landau-Ellis D, Trigiano RN, Gresshoff PM. Quantitative trait loci for agronomic and seed quality traits in an F
doi: 10.1023/A:1022282726117
THEOR APPL GENET 2004, 108(3):458–467.
Glycine max L. Merr.) genetic map and their association with EST markers. THEOR APPL GENET 2004, 108(6):1131–1139.
THEOR APPL GENET 2013, 126(7):1809–1823.
× high-yielding exotic soybean lines. THEOR APPL GENET 2009, 119(3):429–436.
Guzman PS, Diers BW, Neece DJ, St. Martin SK, LeRoy AR, Grau CR, Hughes TJ, Nelson RL. QTL Associated with yield in three backcross-derived populations of soybean. CROP SCI. 2007;47(1):111–22.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2006.01.0003
Reinprecht Y, Poysa VW, Yu K, Rajcan I, Ablett GR, Pauls KP. Seed and agronomic QTL in low linolenic acid, lipoxygenase-free soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) germplasm. GENOME. 2006;49(12):1510–27.
doi: 10.1139/g06-112
pubmed: 17426766
THEOR APPL GENET 2010, 120(5):997–1003.
THEOR APPL GENET 2012, 125(6):1353–1369.
THEOR APPL GENET 2019, 132(6):1833–1845.
Kong L, Lu S, Wang Y, Fang C, Wang F, Nan H, Su T, Li S, Zhang F, Li X, et al. Quantitative trait locus mapping of flowering time and Maturity in soybean using next-generation sequencing-based analysis. FRONT PLANT SCI. 2018;9:995.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00995
pubmed: 30050550
pmcid: 6050445
Chen H, Shan Z, Sha A, Wu B, Yang Z, Chen S, Zhou R, Zhou X. Quantitative trait loci analysis of stem strength and related traits in soybean. Euphytica. 2011;179(3):485–97.
doi: 10.1007/s10681-011-0382-5
Luo S, Jia J, Liu R, Wei R, Guo Z, Cai Z, Chen B, Liang F, Xia Q, Nian H, et al. Identification of major QTLs for soybean seed size and seed weight traits using a RIL population in different environments. FRONT PLANT SCI. 2022;13:1094112.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1094112
pubmed: 36714756
Asekova S, Kulkarni KP, Kim M, Kim JH, Song JT, Shannon JG, Lee JD. Novel quantitative trait loci for Forage Quality traits in a Cross between PI 483463 and ‘Hutcheson’ in soybean. CROP SCI. 2016;56(5):2600–11.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2016.02.0125
THEOR APPL GENET 2014, 127(3):659–675.
JIA J, WANG H, CAI Z, WEI R, HUANG J, XIA Q, XIAO X, NIAN MAQ, CHENG H. Identification and validation of stable and novel quantitative trait loci for pod shattering in soybean [Glycinemax (L.) Merr]. J INTEGR AGR. 2022;21(11):3169–84.
doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2022.08.082
Xian P, Cai Z, Jiang B, Xia Q, Cheng Y, Yang Y, Zhou Q, Lian T, Ma Q, Wang Y, et al. GmRmd1 encodes a TIR-NBS-BSP protein and confers resistance to powdery mildew in soybean. PLANT COMMUN. 2022;3(6):100418.
doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100418
pubmed: 35957521
pmcid: 9700122
THEOR APPL GENET 2018, 131(8):1715–1728.
Wang Y, Yu K, Poysa V, Shi C, Zhou Y. Selection of reference genes for normalization of qRT-PCR analysis of differentially expressed genes in soybean exposed to cadmium. MOL BIOL REP. 2012;39(2):1585–94.
doi: 10.1007/s11033-011-0897-9
pubmed: 21625860
Xian P, Cai Z, Cheng Y, Lin R, Lian T, Ma Q, Nian H. Wild Soybean Oxalyl-CoA Synthetase Degrades Oxalate and Affects the Tolerance to Cadmium and Aluminum Stresses. INT J MOL SCI 2020, 21(22).
Wang H, Lu H, Yang Z, Zhang Z, Li M, Zhang Z, Dai W, Song X, Olsen KM, Qiang S. Characterization of lodging variation of weedy rice. J EXP BOT. 2023;74(5):1403–19.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac480
pubmed: 36478231
Hussain S, Shuxian L, Mumtaz M, Shafiq I, Iqbal N, Brestic M, Shoaib M, Sisi Q, Li W, Mei X, et al. Foliar application of silicon improves stem strength under low light stress by regulating lignin biosynthesis genes in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr). J HAZARD MATER. 2021;401:123256.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123256
pubmed: 32629356
Mehrabi Z, Ramankutty N. Synchronized failure of global crop production. NAT ECOL EVOL. 2019;3(5):780–6.
doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-0862-x
pubmed: 30988491
THEOR APPL GENET 2021, 134(4):1007–1014.
Fang T, Bai Y, Huang W, Wu Y, Yuan Z, Luan X, Liu X, Sun L. Identification of potential Gene Regulatory pathways affecting the ratio of four-seed pod in soybean. FRONT GENET 2021, 12.
Yue Y, Liu N, Jiang B, Li M, Wang H, Jiang Z, Pan H, Xia Q, Ma Q, Han T, et al. A single nucleotide deletion in J encoding GmELF3 confers long juvenility and is Associated with adaption of tropic soybean. MOL PLANT. 2017;10(4):656–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.12.004
pubmed: 27979775
Zimmer G, Miller MJ, Steketee CJ, Jackson SA, de Tunes L, Li Z. Genetic control and allele variation among soybean maturity groups 000 through IX. PLANT GENOME-US. 2021;14(3):e20146.
doi: 10.1002/tpg2.20146
Liu B, Watanabe S, Uchiyama T, Kong F, Kanazawa A, Xia Z, Nagamatsu A, Arai M, Yamada T, Kitamura K, et al. The soybean stem growth habit gene Dt1 is an ortholog of Arabidopsis TERMINAL FLOWER1. PLANT PHYSIOL. 2010;153(1):198–210.
doi: 10.1104/pp.109.150607
pubmed: 20219831
pmcid: 2862436
Yao D, Liu ZZ, Zhang J, Liu SY, Qu J, Guan SY, Pan LD, Wang D, Liu JW, Wang PW. Analysis of quantitative trait loci for main plant traits in soybean. GENET MOL RES. 2015;14(2):6101–9.
doi: 10.4238/2015.June.8.8
pubmed: 26125811
Glycine max L. Merr. THEOR APPL GENET. 2006;112(4):665–73.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-005-0169-y
Lu Y, Zhang J, Guo X, Chen J, Chang R, Guan R, Qiu L. Identification of Genomic Regions Associated with Vine Growth and Plant Height of soybean. INT J MOL SCI 2022, 23(10).
Hu B, Li Y, Wu H, Zhai H, Xu K, Gao Y, Zhu J, Li Y, Xia Z. Identification of quantitative trait loci underlying five major agronomic traits of soybean in three biparental populations by specific length amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-seq). PEERJ. 2021;9:e12416.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.12416
pubmed: 34993010
pmcid: 8679901
THEOR APPL GENET 2020, 133(3):1039–1054.
Fang Y, Liu S, Dong Q, Zhang K, Tian Z, Li X, Li W, Qi Z, Wang Y, Tian X, et al. Linkage Analysis and Multi-locus genome-wide Association studies identify QTNs Controlling soybean plant height. FRONT PLANT SCI. 2020;11:9.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00009
pubmed: 32117360
pmcid: 7033546
Ogiso-Tanaka E, Shimizu T, Hajika M, Kaga A, Ishimoto M. Highly multiplexed AmpliSeq technology identifies novel variation of flowering time-related genes in soybean (Glycine max). DNA RES. 2019;26(3):243–60.
doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsz005
pubmed: 31231761
pmcid: 6589554
Assefa T, Otyama PI, Brown AV, Kalberer SR, Kulkarni RS, Cannon SB. Genome-wide associations and epistatic interactions for internode number, plant height, seed weight and seed yield in soybean. BMC Genomics. 2019;20(1):527.
doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5907-7
pubmed: 31242867
pmcid: 6595607
Li R, Jiang H, Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Xie J, Wang Q, Zheng H, Hou L, Xiong X, Xin D et al. Combined linkage mapping and BSA to identify QTL and candidate genes for Plant Height and the number of nodes on the main stem in soybean. INT J MOL SCI 2019, 21(1).
Cao Y, Li S, Chen G, Wang Y, Bhat JA, Karikari B, Kong J, Gai J, Zhao T. Deciphering the Genetic Architecture of Plant Height in soybean using two RIL populations sharing a common M8206 parent. PLANTS-BASEL 2019, 8(10).
Oki N, Sayama T, Ishimoto M, Yokota I, Kaga A, Takahashi M, Takahashi M. Quantitative trait loci associated with short inter-node length in soybean. Breed SCI. 2018;68(5):554–60.
doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.18087
pubmed: 30697116
pmcid: 6345224
Zhang X, Wang W, Guo N, Zhang Y, Bu Y, Zhao J, Xing H. Combining QTL-seq and linkage mapping to fine map a wild soybean allele characteristic of greater plant height. BMC Genomics. 2018;19(1):226.
doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4582-4
pubmed: 29587637
pmcid: 5870336
THEOR APPL GENET 2017, 130(11):2297–2314.
Watanabe S, Xia Z, Hideshima R, Tsubokura Y, Sato S, Yamanaka N, Takahashi R, Anai T, Tabata S, Kitamura K, et al. A map-based cloning strategy employing a residual heterozygous line reveals that the GIGANTEA gene is involved in soybean maturity and flowering. Genetics. 2011;188(2):395–407.
doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.125062
pubmed: 21406680
pmcid: 3122305
Muszynska A, Guendel A, Melzer M, Tandron Moya YA, Röder MS, Rolletschek H, Rutten T, Munz E, Melz G, Ortleb S, et al. A mechanistic view on lodging resistance in rye and wheat: a multiscale comparative study. PLANT BIOTECHNOL J. 2021;19(12):2646–61.
doi: 10.1111/pbi.13689
pubmed: 34449959
pmcid: 8633492
Ma QH. Functional analysis of a cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase involved in lignin biosynthesis in wheat. J EXP BOT. 2010;61(10):2735–44.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq107
pubmed: 20400532
pmcid: 2882267
Chai S, Yao Q, Zhang X, Xiao X, Fan X, Zeng J, Sha L, Kang H, Zhang H, Li J et al. The semi-dwarfing gene rht-dp from dwarf Polish wheat (Triticum polonicum L.) is the Green Revolution gene Rht-B1b. BMC Genomics 2021, 22(1).
Ford BA, Foo E, Sharwood R, Karafiatova M, Vrana J, MacMillan C, Nichols DS, Steuernagel B, Uauy C, Dolezel J, et al. Rht18 semidwarfism in wheat is due to increased GA 2-oxidaseA9 expression and reduced GA Content. PLANT PHYSIOL. 2018;177(1):168–80.
doi: 10.1104/pp.18.00023
pubmed: 29545269
pmcid: 5933146
Li P, Liu Y, Tan W, Chen J, Zhu M, Lv Y, Liu Y, Yu S, Zhang W, Cai H. Brittle culm 1 encodes a COBRA-Like protein involved in secondary cell Wall Cellulose Biosynthesis in Sorghum. PLANT CELL PHYSIOL. 2019;60(4):788–801.
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcy246
pubmed: 30590744
Li H, Wang L, Liu M, Dong Z, Li Q, Fei S, Xiang H, Liu B, Jin W. Maize Plant Architecture is regulated by the Ethylene Biosynthetic Gene ZmACS7. PLANT PHYSIOL. 2020;183(3):1184–99.
doi: 10.1104/pp.19.01421
pubmed: 32321843
pmcid: 7333711
Shi J, Drummond BJ, Habben JE, Brugire N, Weers BP, Hakimi SM, Lafitte HR, Schussler JR, Mo H, Beatty M, et al. Ectopic expression of ARGOS8 reveals a role for ethylene in root-lodging resistance in maize. Plant J. 2019;97(2):378–90.
doi: 10.1111/tpj.14131
pubmed: 30326542
Liu L, Liu S, Lu H, Tian Z, Zhao H, Wei D, Wang S, Huang Z. Integration of transcriptome and metabolome analyses reveals Ke lodging-resistance-related genes and metabolic pathways in maize. FRONT GENET. 2022;13:1001195.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1001195
pubmed: 36299597
pmcid: 9588961
Ke S, Luan X, Liang J, Hung Y, Hsieh T, Zhang X. Rice OsPEX1, an extensin-like protein, affects lignin biosynthesis and plant growth. PLANT MOL BIOL. 2019;100(1–2):151–61.
doi: 10.1007/s11103-019-00849-3
pubmed: 30840202
Li F, Liu S, Xu H, Xu Q. A novel FC17/CESA4 mutation causes increased biomass saccharification and lodging resistance by remodeling cell wall in rice. BIOTECHNOL BIOFUELS 2018, 11(1).
Guo S, Zhang X, Bai Q, Zhao W, Fang Y, Zhou S, Zhao B, He L, Chen J. Cloning and Functional Analysis of Dwarf Gene Mini Plant 1 (MNP1) in Medicago truncatula. INT J MOL SCI 2020, 21(14).
Liew LC, Singh MB, Bhalla PL. A novel role of the soybean clock gene LUX ARRHYTHMO in male reproductive development. SCI REP-UK. 2017;7(1):10605.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10823-y
Lu S, Zhao X, Hu Y, Liu S, Nan H, Li X, Fang C, Cao D, Shi X, Kong L, et al. Natural variation at the soybean J locus improves adaptation to the tropics and enhances yield. NAT GENET. 2017;49(5):773–9.
doi: 10.1038/ng.3819
pubmed: 28319089
Gomez-Mena C, Sablowski R. ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA HOMEOBOX GENE1 establishes the basal boundaries of shoot organs and controls stem growth. PLANT CELL. 2008;20(8):2059–72.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.059188
pubmed: 18757555
pmcid: 2553610
Hudson D, Guevara D, Yaish MW, Hannam C, Long N, Clarke JD, Bi YM, Rothstein SJ. GNC and CGA1 modulate chlorophyll biosynthesis and glutamate synthase (GLU1/Fd-GOGAT) expression in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(11):e26765.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026765
pubmed: 22102866
pmcid: 3213100
Lazar G, Goodman HM. MAX1, a regulator of the flavonoid pathway, controls vegetative axillary bud outgrowth in Arabidopsis. P NATL ACAD SCI USA. 2006;103(2):472–6.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509463102
Liu D, Gong Q, Ma Y, Li P, Li J, Yang S, Yuan L, Yu Y, Pan D, Xu F, et al. cpSecA, a thylakoid protein translocase subunit, is essential for photosynthetic development in Arabidopsis. J EXP BOT. 2010;61(6):1655–69.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq033
pubmed: 20194926
Shanmugam S, Zhao S, Nandy S, Srivastava V, Khodakovskaya M. Modification of soybean growth and abiotic stress tolerance by expression of truncated ERECTA protein from Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(5):e233383.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233383
Villagarcia H, Morin AC, Shpak ED, Khodakovskaya MV. Modification of tomato growth by expression of truncated ERECTA protein from Arabidopsis thaliana. J EXP BOT. 2012;63(18):6493–504.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers305
pubmed: 23096000
Betancur L, Singh B, Rapp RA, Wendel JF, Marks MD, Roberts AW, Haigler CH: Phylogenetically distinct cellulose synthase genes support secondary wall thickening in arabidopsis shoot trichomes and cotton fiber. J Integr Plant Biol 2010, 52(2):205–220.