Surgical treatment of chronic pancreatitis with an inflammatory pancreatic head mass: a retrospective study.
Humans
Pancreatitis, Chronic
/ surgery
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
/ methods
Retrospective Studies
Male
Middle Aged
Female
Adult
Pancreas
/ surgery
Operative Time
Aged
Length of Stay
/ statistics & numerical data
Pancreatectomy
/ methods
Postoperative Complications
/ etiology
Duodenum
/ surgery
Treatment Outcome
Hospital Mortality
Organ Sparing Treatments
/ methods
Beger
Chronic pancreatitis
Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection
Inflammatory pancreatic head mass
Pancreatic surgery
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Journal
BMC gastroenterology
ISSN: 1471-230X
Titre abrégé: BMC Gastroenterol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968547
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Oct 2024
02 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
23
04
2024
accepted:
24
07
2024
medline:
3
10
2024
pubmed:
3
10
2024
entrez:
2
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Conservative treatment of chronic pancreatitis has only a limited effect in most patients. Surgery offers very good long-term results, even in the early stages of the disease. Unfortunately, only a minority of patients undergo surgical treatment. The aim of this work was to summarise the current treatment options for patients with an inflammatory mass of the pancreatic head. Data from patients in our study demonstrates that the surgery is a safe method, and here we compare the perioperative and early postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection for chronic pancreatitis. All patients who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy or a duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection in our department between 2014 and 2022 were included in this study. Perioperative and early postoperative results were statistically analysed and compared. Thirty-eight pancreaticoduodenectomies and 23 duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resections were performed. The overall mortality was 3%, whereas the in-hospital mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy was 5%. The mortality after duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection was 0%. No statistically significant differences in the hospital stay, blood loss, and serious morbidity were found in either surgery. Operative time was significantly shorter in the duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection group. Both pancreatoduodenectomy and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection are safe treatment options. Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection showed a statistically significant superiority in the operative time compared to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Although other monitored parameters did not show a statistically significant difference, the high risk of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy with a mortality of 5%; maintenance of the duodenum and upper loop of jejunum, and lower risk of metabolic dysfunctions after duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection may favour duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection in recommended diagnoses. Attending physicians should be more encouraged to use a multidisciplinary approach to assess the suitability of surgical treatment in patients with chronic pancreatitis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Conservative treatment of chronic pancreatitis has only a limited effect in most patients. Surgery offers very good long-term results, even in the early stages of the disease. Unfortunately, only a minority of patients undergo surgical treatment. The aim of this work was to summarise the current treatment options for patients with an inflammatory mass of the pancreatic head. Data from patients in our study demonstrates that the surgery is a safe method, and here we compare the perioperative and early postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection for chronic pancreatitis.
METHODS
METHODS
All patients who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy or a duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection in our department between 2014 and 2022 were included in this study. Perioperative and early postoperative results were statistically analysed and compared.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Thirty-eight pancreaticoduodenectomies and 23 duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resections were performed. The overall mortality was 3%, whereas the in-hospital mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy was 5%. The mortality after duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection was 0%. No statistically significant differences in the hospital stay, blood loss, and serious morbidity were found in either surgery. Operative time was significantly shorter in the duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection group.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Both pancreatoduodenectomy and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection are safe treatment options. Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection showed a statistically significant superiority in the operative time compared to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Although other monitored parameters did not show a statistically significant difference, the high risk of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy with a mortality of 5%; maintenance of the duodenum and upper loop of jejunum, and lower risk of metabolic dysfunctions after duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection may favour duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection in recommended diagnoses. Attending physicians should be more encouraged to use a multidisciplinary approach to assess the suitability of surgical treatment in patients with chronic pancreatitis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39358718
doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03338-0
pii: 10.1186/s12876-024-03338-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
345Subventions
Organisme : Ministerstvo Obrany České Republiky
ID : MO 1012
Organisme : Ministerstvo Obrany České Republiky
ID : MO 1012
Organisme : Ministerstvo Obrany České Republiky
ID : MO 1012
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Whitcomb DC, Frulloni L, Garg P, et al. Chronic pancreatitis: an international draft consensus proposal for a new mechanistic definition. Pancreatology. 2016;16(2):218–24.
doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2016.02.001
pubmed: 26924663
Eisses J, Husain S. Molecular understanding of chronic pancreatitis. In: Beger H, Warshaw A, Hruban R, Büchler M, Lerch M, Neoptolemos JP, Shimosegawa T, Whitcomb DC, Groß C. The Pancreas: An Integrated Textbook of Basic Science, Medicine, and Surgery. 3rd Edition. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell; 2018. pp. 24–41.
Büchler M, Malfertheiner P, Friess H, Senn T, Beger HG. Chronic pancreatitis with inflammatory mass in the head of the pancreas: a special entity? In: Beger HG, Büchler M, Ditschuneit H, Malfertheiner P, editors. Chronic pancreatitis. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1990. pp. 41–6.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-75319-0_6
Keck T, Marjanovic G, Fernandez-del Castillo C, et al. The inflammatory pancreatic head mass: significant differences in the anatomic pathology of German and American patients with chronic pancreatitis determine very different surgical strategies. Ann Surg. 2009;249(1):105–10.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818ef078
pubmed: 19106684
Beger HG, Gansauge F, Schwarz M, Poch B. Chronic pancreatitis: inflammatory mass in the head of the pancreas — pacemaker of chronic pancreatitis. In: Beger HG, Matsuno S, Cameron JL, Rau BM, Sunamura M, Schulick RD, editors. Diseases of the pancreas. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2008. pp. 311–17.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-28656-1_35
Wilcox CM, Yadav D, Ye T, Gardner TB, et al. Chronic pancreatitis pain pattern and severity are independent of abdominal imaging findings. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13(3):552–60.
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.10.015
pubmed: 25424572
Wellner UF, Keck T. Chronic pancreatitis with inflammatory mass of the pancreatic head. In: Beger H, Warshaw A, Hruban R, Büchler M, Lerch M, Neoptolemos JP, Shimosegawa T, Whitcomb DC, Groß C. The pancreas: An Integrated Textbook of Basic Science, Medicine, and Surgery. 3rd Edition. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell; 2018. pp. 365 – 70.
Demir IE, Tieftrunk E, Maak M, Friess H, Ceyhan GO. Pain mechanisms in chronic pancreatitis: of a master and his fire. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011;396:151–60.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-010-0731-1
pubmed: 21153480
Kempeneers MA, Issa Y, Ali UA, et al. Working group for the International (IAP – APA – JPS – EPC) Consensus guidelines for Chronic Pancreatitis. International consensus guidelines for surgery and the timing of intervention in chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2020;20(2):149–57.
doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2019.12.005
pubmed: 31870802
Valente R, Waldthaler A, Scandavini CM, et al. Conservative treatment of chronic pancreatitis: a practical approach. Scand J Surg. 2020;109(1):59–68.
doi: 10.1177/1457496920905559
pubmed: 32192418
Kitano M, Gress TM, Garg PK, et al. International consensus guidelines on interventional endoscopy in chronic pancreatitis. Recommendations from the working group for the international consensus guidelines for chronic pancreatitis in collaboration with the International Association of Pancreatology, the American Pancreatic Association, the Japan Pancreas Society, and European Pancreatic Club. Pancreatology. 2020;20(6):1045–55.
doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.05.022
pubmed: 32792253
Ahmed Ali U, Pahlplatz JM, Nealon WH, van Goor H, Gooszen HG, Boermeester MA. Endoscopic or surgical intervention for painful obstructive chronic pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;1:CD007884.
pubmed: 22258975
Issa Y, Kempeneers MA, Bruno MJ, et al. Dutch pancreatitis study group. Effect of early surgery vs endoscopy-first approach on pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis: the ESCAPE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;323(3):237–47.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.20967
pubmed: 31961419
pmcid: 6990680
Hlavsa J, Loveček M, Čečka F, et al. Současný stav chirurgické léčby chronické pankreatitidy v České republice. Rozhl Chir. 2022;101:557–60.
Dítě P, Starý K, Novotný I, et al. Incidence of chronic pancreatitis in the Czech Republic. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;13(6):749–50.
doi: 10.1097/00042737-200106000-00024
pubmed: 11434607
Yang CJ, Bliss LA, Schapira EF, et al. Systematic review of early surgery for chronic pancreatitis: impact on pain, pancreatic function, and re-intervention. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:1863–69.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2571-8
pubmed: 24944153
Beger HG, Kunz R, Poch B. The Beger procedure - duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8(8):1090–97.
doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2003.12.001
pubmed: 15702531
Xia B, Dhar V, Ahmad S. Management of head-dominant chronic pancreatitis. In: Chu QD, Vollmer MC (Jr.), Zibari BG, Orloff LS, Williams M, Giménez ME Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery: Practical Management of Dilemmas. Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AHPBA) Shreveport: Beaux Books Publishing; 2018. pp. 430 – 39.
Frey CF, Smith GJ. Description and rationale of a new operation for chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas. 1987;2(6):701–7.
doi: 10.1097/00006676-198711000-00014
pubmed: 3438308
Büchler MV, Berberat P, Beger KG, Friess H. The Duodenum-preserving pancreatic Head Resection: an organ-preserving operation in chronic pancreatitis. Dig Surg. 1996;13(2):127–33.
doi: 10.1159/000172419
Gurusamy KS, Lusuku C, Halkias C, Davidson BR. Duodenum-preserving pancreatic resection versus pancreaticoduodenectomy for chronic pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2(2):CD011521.
pubmed: 26837472
Guo S, Zhou Q, Yang J, Tao J, Zhang J, Wang H. Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection compared to pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of surgical outcomes. Front Surg. 2023;10:1107613.
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1107613
pubmed: 37066008
pmcid: 10090510
Keck T, Adam U, Makowiec F, et al. Short- and long-term results of duodenum preservation versus resection for the management of chronic pancreatitis: a prospective, randomized study. Surgery. 2012;152:S95–102.
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.05.016
pubmed: 22906892
Schäfer M, Müllhaupt B, Clavien PA. Evidence-based pancreatic head resection for pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg. 2002;236(2):137–48.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-200208000-00001
pubmed: 12170018
pmcid: 1422559
Bachmann K, Tomkoetter L, Kutup A, et al. Is the Whipple procedure harmful for long-term outcome in treatment of chronic pancreatitis? 15-years follow-up comparing the outcome after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy and Frey procedure in chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg. 2013;258(5):815–20.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a655a8
pubmed: 24096767