Genomic estimated selection criteria and parental contributions in parent selection increase genetic gain of maternal haploid inducers in maize.
Journal
TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik
ISSN: 1432-2242
Titre abrégé: Theor Appl Genet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0145600
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Oct 2024
06 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
23
04
2024
accepted:
13
09
2024
medline:
6
10
2024
pubmed:
6
10
2024
entrez:
6
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Parental combinations determined by genomic estimated usefulness and parental contributions of the lines in bridging population can enhance the genetic gain of traits of interest in maternal haploid inducer breeding. Parent selection in crosses aligns well with the quantitative trait performance in the progenies. We herein take advantage of estimated genetic values (EGV) and usefulness criteria (UC) of bi-parental combinations by genomic prediction (GP) to compare the empirical performance of doubled haploid inducer (DHI) progenies of eight elite inducers crosses in a half-diallel. We used parental contribution and discovery of superiors from elite-by-historical bridging populations to enhance genetic gain for long-term selection. In this empirical study, the narrow-sense heritabilities of four traits of interest (Days to flowering, DTF; haploid induction rate, HIR; plant height, PHT; Total primary branch length, PBL) in DHI population were 0.81, 0.71, 0.45 and 0.46, respectively. The genomic estimated EGV_Mid/Mean and EGV/UC_Inferior was significantly correlated with the sample mean of progenies and inferiors in four traits in the breeding and bridging population. EGV/UC_Superior were significantly correlated with the mean of superiors in DTF, PHT, and PBL in breeding and bridging populations. The genomic estimated parent contributions in DH progenies of bridging populations enabled discovery of favorable genome region from historical inducers to improve the genetic gain of HIR for long-term selection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39369351
doi: 10.1007/s00122-024-04744-4
pii: 10.1007/s00122-024-04744-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
248Subventions
Organisme : National Institute of Food and Agriculture
ID : 2018-51181-28419
Organisme : National Institute of Food and Agriculture
ID : 2020-51300-32180
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Akdemir D, Sánchez JI (2016) Efficient breeding by genomic mating. Front Genet 7:210. https://doi.org/10.3389/FGENE.2016.00210/BIBTEX
doi: 10.3389/FGENE.2016.00210/BIBTEX
pubmed: 27965707
pmcid: 5126051
Akdemir D, Sanchez JI, Jannink JL (2015) Optimization of genomic selection training populations with a genetic algorithm. Genet Sel Evol 47:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12711-015-0116-6/FIG.S/5
doi: 10.1186/S12711-015-0116-6/FIG.S/5
Akdemir D, Beavis W, Fritsche-Neto R, Singh AK, Isidro-Sánchez J (2018) Multi-objective optimized genomic breeding strategies for sustainable food improvement. Heredity 122(5):672–683. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-018-0147-1
doi: 10.1038/s41437-018-0147-1
pubmed: 30262841
pmcid: 6461918
Allier A, Lehermeier C, Charcosset A, Moreau L, Teyssèdre S (2019a) Improving short-and long-term genetic gain by accounting for within-family variance in optimal cross-selection. Front Genet 10:1006. https://doi.org/10.3389/FGENE.2019.01006/BIBTEX
doi: 10.3389/FGENE.2019.01006/BIBTEX
pubmed: 31737033
pmcid: 6828944
Allier A, Moreau L, Charcosset A, Teyssèdre S, Lehermeier C (2019b) Usefulness criterion and post-selection parental contributions in multi-parental crosses: application to polygenic trait introgression. G3 Genes|genomes|genetics 9(5):1469–1479. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400129
doi: 10.1534/g3.119.400129
pubmed: 30819823
pmcid: 6505154
Allier, A., Teyssèdre, S., Lehermeier, C., Moreau, L., and Charcosset, A. (2020). Optimized breeding strategies to harness genetic resources with different performance levels. BMC Genomics 21, 1DUMM. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12864-020-6756-0/TABLES/2
Almeida VC, Trentin HU, Frei UK, Lübberstedt T (2020) Genomic prediction of maternal haploid induction rate in maize. Plant Genome 13:e20014. https://doi.org/10.1002/TPG2.20014
doi: 10.1002/TPG2.20014
pubmed: 33016635
Bernardo R (2014) Genomewide selection of parental inbreds: classes of loci and virtual Biparental populations. Crop Sci 54:2586–2595. https://doi.org/10.2135/CROPSCI2014.01.0088
doi: 10.2135/CROPSCI2014.01.0088
Berro I, Lado B, Nalin RS, Quincke M, Gutiérrez L (2019) Training population optimization for genomic selection. Plant Genome 12:190028. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2019.04.0028
doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2019.04.0028
Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES (2007) TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23:2633–2635. https://doi.org/10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTM308
doi: 10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTM308
pubmed: 17586829
Chaikam V, Nair SK, Martinez L, Lopez LA, Utz HF, Melchinger AE et al (2018a) Marker-assisted breeding of improved maternal haploid inducers in maize for the tropical/subtropical regions. Front Plant Sci 9:1527. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01527
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01527
pubmed: 30405665
pmcid: 6201356
Chaikam, V., Nair, S. K., Martinez, L., Lopez, L. A., Utz, H. F., Melchinger, A. E., et al. (2018b). Marker-Assisted Breeding of Improved Maternal Haploid Inducers in Maize for the Tropical/Subtropical Regions. Front Plant Sci 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01527
Chang MT, Coe EH (2009) Doubled haploids. Biotechnol Agric for 63:127–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68922-5_10/COVER
doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-68922-5_10/COVER
Chen Y-R, Lübberstedt T, Frei UK (2024) Development of doubled haploid inducer lines facilitates selection of superior haploid inducers in maize. Front Plant Sci 14:1320660. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1320660
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1320660
pubmed: 38250445
pmcid: 10796511
Chung PY, Liao CT (2020) Identification of superior parental lines for biparental crossing via genomic prediction. PLoS ONE 15:e0243159. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0243159
doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0243159
pubmed: 33270706
pmcid: 7714229
Coe EH Jr (1959) A line of maize with high haploid frequency. The Am Natural 93:381–382. https://doi.org/10.1086/282098
doi: 10.1086/282098
Combs E, Bernardo R (2013) Genomewide selection to introgress semidwarf maize germplasm into U.S. Corn Belt Inbreds Crop Sci 53:1427–1436. https://doi.org/10.2135/CROPSCI2012.11.0666
doi: 10.2135/CROPSCI2012.11.0666
Daetwyler HD, Pong-Wong R, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA (2010) The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Genetics 185:1021–1031. https://doi.org/10.1534/GENETICS.110.116855
doi: 10.1534/GENETICS.110.116855
pubmed: 20407128
pmcid: 2907189
Endelman JB (2011) Ridge regression and other kernels for genomic selection with R package rrBLUP. Plant Genome 4:250–255. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2011.08.0024
doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2011.08.0024
Gilles LM, Khaled A, Laffaire J-B, Chaignon S, Gendrot G, Laplaige J et al (2017) Loss of pollen-specific phospholipase NOT LIKE DAD triggers gynogenesis in maize. EMBO J 36:707–717. https://doi.org/10.15252/EMBJ.201796603
doi: 10.15252/EMBJ.201796603
pubmed: 28228439
pmcid: 5350562
Gorjanc G, Gaynor RC, Hickey JM (2018) Optimal cross selection for long-term genetic gain in two-part programs with rapid recurrent genomic selection. Theor Appl Genet 131:1953–1966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-018-3125-3
doi: 10.1007/s00122-018-3125-3
pubmed: 29876589
pmcid: 6096640
Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM (2007) The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 177:2389–2397. https://doi.org/10.1534/GENETICS.107.081190
doi: 10.1534/GENETICS.107.081190
pubmed: 18073436
pmcid: 2219482
Heffner EL, Sorrells ME, Jannink JL (2009) Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci 49:1–12. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.08.0512
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2008.08.0512
Isidro J, Jannink JL, Akdemir D, Poland J, Heslot N, Sorrells ME (2015) Training set optimization under population structure in genomic selection. Theor Appl Genet 128:145–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00122-014-2418-4/FIG.S/6
doi: 10.1007/S00122-014-2418-4/FIG.S/6
pubmed: 25367380
Jaccoud D, Peng K, Feinstein D, Kilian A (2001) Diversity arrays: a solid state technology for sequence information independent genotyping. Nucleic Acids Res 29:e25–e25. https://doi.org/10.1093/NAR/29.4.E25
doi: 10.1093/NAR/29.4.E25
pubmed: 11160945
pmcid: 29632
Jacquier NMA, Gilles LM, Pyott DE, Martinant J-P, Rogowsky PM, Widiez T (2020) Puzzling out plant reproduction by haploid induction for innovations in plant breeding. Nat Plants 6:610–619. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-0664-9
doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-0664-9
pubmed: 32514145
Jacquier NM, Calhau AR, Fierlej Y, Martinant JP, Rogowsky PM, Gilles LM, Widiez T (2023) In planta haploid induction by kokopelli mutants. Plant Physiol 193(1):182–185
doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiad328
pubmed: 37300445
pmcid: 10469538
Jannink JL (2010) Dynamics of long-term genomic selection. Genet Sel Evol 42:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-42-35/FIG.S/3
doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-42-35/FIG.S/3
Jiang C, Sun J, Li R, Yan S, Chen W, Guo L et al (2022) A reactive oxygen species burst causes haploid induction in maize. Mol Plant 15:943–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLP.2022.04.001
doi: 10.1016/J.MOLP.2022.04.001
pubmed: 35395409
Kassambara A (2023) ggpubr: ‘ggplot2’ Based Publication Ready Plots. R package version 0.6.0. https://rpkgs.datanovia.com/ggpubr/
Kelliher T, Starr D, Richbourg L, Chintamanani S, Delzer B, Nuccio ML et al (2017) MATRILINEAL, a sperm-specific phospholipase, triggers maize haploid induction. Nature 542(7639):105–109. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20827
doi: 10.1038/nature20827
pubmed: 28114299
Lehermeier C, Teyssèdre S, Schön CC (2017) Genetic gain increases by applying the usefulness criterion with improved variance prediction in selection of crosses. Genetics 207:1651–1661. https://doi.org/10.1534/GENETICS.117.300403/-/DC1
doi: 10.1534/GENETICS.117.300403/-/DC1
pubmed: 29038144
pmcid: 5714471
Li Y, Lin Z, Yue Y, Zhao H, Fei X, Lizhu E et al (2021) Loss-of-function alleles of ZmPLD3 cause haploid induction in maize. Nature Plants 7(12):1579–1588. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-021-01037-2
doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-01037-2
pubmed: 34887519
pmcid: 8677622
Lin Zi, Cogan NOI, Pembleton LW, Spangenberg GC, Forster JW, Hayes BJ et al (2016) genetic gain and inbreeding from genomic selection in a simulated commercial breeding program for perennial ryegrass. The Plant Genome. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2015.06.0046
doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2015.06.0046
pubmed: 27902804
Liu C, Li X, Meng D, Zhong Y, Chen C, Dong X et al (2017) A 4-bp insertion at ZmPLA1 Encoding a putative phospholipase a generates haploid induction in maize. Mol Plant 10:520–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLP.2017.01.011
doi: 10.1016/J.MOLP.2017.01.011
pubmed: 28179149
Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001) Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157:1819–1829
doi: 10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819
pubmed: 11290733
pmcid: 1461589
Moeinizade S, Hu G, Wang L, Schnable PS (2019) Optimizing selection and mating in genomic selection with a look-ahead approach: An operations research framework. G3: Genes. Genomes, Genetics 9:2123–2133. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.118.200842
doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200842
Moeinizade S, Kusmec A, Hu G, Wang L, Schnable PS (2020) Multi-trait genomic selection methods for crop improvement. Genetics 215:931–945. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.120.303305
doi: 10.1534/genetics.120.303305
pubmed: 32482640
pmcid: 7404246
Mohammadi M, Tiede T, Smith KP (2015) Popvar: A genome-wide procedure for predicting genetic variance and correlated response in biparental breeding populations. Crop Sci 55:2068–2077. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.01.0030
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2015.01.0030
Müller D, Schopp P, Melchinger AE (2018) Selection on expected maximum haploid breeding values can increase genetic gain in recurrent genomic selection. G3: Genes. Genomes, Genetics 8:1173–1181. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.118.200091
doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200091
Ou JH, Liao CT (2019) Training set determination for genomic selection. Theor Appl Genet 132:2781–2792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03387-0
doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03387-0
pubmed: 31267147
Pérez P, De Los Campos G (2014) Genome-wide regression and prediction with the BGLR statistical package. Genetics 198:483–495. https://doi.org/10.1534/GENETICS.114.164442/-/DC1
doi: 10.1534/GENETICS.114.164442/-/DC1
pubmed: 25009151
pmcid: 4196607
Prigge V, Schipprack W, Mahuku G, Atlin GN, Melchinger AE (2012a) Development of in vivo haploid inducers for tropical maize breeding programs. Euphytica 185:481–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-012-0657-5
doi: 10.1007/s10681-012-0657-5
Prigge V, Xu X, Li L, Babu R, Chen S, Atlin GN et al (2012b) New insights into the genetics of in vivo induction of maternal haploids, the backbone of doubled haploid technology in maize. Genetics 190:781–793. https://doi.org/10.1534/GENETICS.111.133066
doi: 10.1534/GENETICS.111.133066
pubmed: 22135357
pmcid: 3276611
Pszczola M, Strabel T, Mulder HA, Calus MPL (2012) Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population. J Dairy Sci 95:389–400. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4338
doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4338
pubmed: 22192218
Rotarenco, V., Dicu, G., State, D., and Fuia, S. (2010). New inducers of maternal haploids in maize. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter, 21–22.
Rutkoski J, Singh RP, Huerta‐Espino J, Bhavani S, Poland J, Jannink JL, Sorrells ME (2015) Genetic gain from phenotypic and genomic selection for quantitative resistance to stem rust of wheat. The Plant Genome. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2014.10.0074
doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2014.10.0074
pubmed: 33228313
Schloerke B, Cook D, Larmarange J, Briatte F, Marbach M, Thoen E, Elberg A, Crowley J (2024) GGally: extension to ‘ggplot2’. R package version 2.2.1. https://github.com/ggobi/ggally , https://ggobi.github.io/ggally/
Schnell F, Utz H (1975) F1-Leistung und Elternwahl in der Züchtung von Selbstbefruchtern. Bericht über die Arbeitstagung der Vereinigung österreichischer Pflanzenzüchter. BAL Gumpenstein, Gumpenstein, Austria, pp 243–248
Searle SR, Speed FM, Milliken GA (1980) Population marginal means in the linear model: An alternative to least squares means. Am Stat 34:216–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1980.10483031
doi: 10.1080/00031305.1980.10483031
Trentin, H. U., Dalsente Krause, M., Zunjare, R. U., Almeida, V. C., Peterlini, E., Rotarenco, V., et al. (n.d.). Genetic basis of maize maternal haploid induction beyond MATRILINEAL and ZmDMP. Front Plant Sci 14, 1218042. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPLS.2023.1218042
Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: elegant Graphics for Data Analysis
Wientjes YCJ, Bijma P, Calus MPL, Zwaan BJ, Vitezica ZG, van den Heuvel J (2022) The long-term effects of genomic selection: 1. Response to selection, additive genetic variance, and genetic architecture. Genet Sel Evol 54:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12711-022-00709-7/FIG.S/1
doi: 10.1186/S12711-022-00709-7/FIG.S/1
Xu X, Li L, Dong X, Jin W, Melchinger AE, Chen S (2013) Gametophytic and zygotic selection leads to segregation distortion through in vivo induction of a maternal haploid in maize. J Exp Bot 64:1083–1096. https://doi.org/10.1093/JXB/ERS393
doi: 10.1093/JXB/ERS393
pubmed: 23349137
pmcid: 3580820
Xiaoqing Y, Li X, Guo T, Zhu C, Yuye W, Mitchell SE et al (2016) Genomic prediction contributing to a promising global strategy to turbocharge gene banks. Nat Plants. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.150
doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.150
Zhang, Z., and Wang, L. (2022). A look-ahead approach to maximizing present value of genetic gains in genomic selection. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 12. https://doi.org/10.1093/G3JOURNAL/JKAC136
Zhong S, Jannink JL (2007) Using quantitative trait loci results to discriminate among crosses on the basis of their progeny mean and variance. Genetics 177(1):567–576
doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.075358
pubmed: 17660556
pmcid: 2013701
Zhong Y, Liu C, Qi X, Jiao Y, Wang D, Wang Y et al (2019) Mutation of ZmDMP enhances haploid induction in maize. Nature Plants 5(6):575–580. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-019-0443-7
doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0443-7
pubmed: 31182848