The impact of explaining vegetarian meal requests on the affective responses and perceptions of meat eaters.
Affective responses
Meat restrictor
Perceptions
Social situations
Vegetarian
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 10 2024
16 10 2024
Historique:
received:
11
01
2024
accepted:
26
09
2024
medline:
17
10
2024
pubmed:
17
10
2024
entrez:
16
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Social situations can present challenges for those looking to reduce or avoid eating meat. In an experimental vignette study with a large representative sample of 1,117 UK-based meat eaters, we explore affective responses to requests for vegetarian meals and perceptions of those making the request across four social situations: a BBQ, a pub, a restaurant dinner, and a dinner party. We examine moderators of these perceptions including whether the requester presents themselves as vegetarian or a meat restrictor and whether they cite health, environmental or no motives for their request. Overall, we find that these moderators have a greater impact on meat eaters' perceptions of the requester than on their affective responses to the request. We also find that these outcomes are more impacted by the mention of motives than they are diet type. Standout findings include evidence that people citing environmental motives for their vegetarian meal request are perceived more negatively, while those with health motives are perceived more positively. We also identify substantial heterogeneity across the respondents' levels of meat attachment: those who are more attached to meat have more negative perceptions of vegetarian meal requesters and experience higher negative affect and lower positive affect in response to the request.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39414849
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74479-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-74479-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
24262Subventions
Organisme : European Commission
ID : 845342
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Marteau, T. M., Chater, N. & Garnett, E. E. Changing behaviour for net zero 2050. Bmj 375:n2293 (2021).
Watts, N. et al. The 2020 report of the Lancet countdown on health and climate change: Responding to converging crises. Lancet. 397, 129–170 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32290-X
Ritchie, H. & Roser, M. Environmental impacts of food production. In Our World Data (2020).
Xu, X. et al. Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods. Nat. Food. 2, 724–732 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00358-x
Scarborough, P. et al. Dietary greenhouse gas emissions of meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans in the UK. Clim. Change. 125, 179–192 (2014).
doi: 10.1007/s10584-014-1169-1
Jones, C. M. & Kammen, D. M. Quantifying carbon footprint reduction opportunities for U.S. households and communities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 4088–4095 (2011).
doi: 10.1021/es102221h
Wang, M. et al. Dietary meat, trimethylamine N-oxide-related metabolites, and incident cardiovascular disease among older adults: The cardiovascular health study. ATVB 42 (2022).
Turner-McGrievy, G., Mandes, T. & Crimarco, A. A plant-based diet for overweight and obesity prevention and treatment. J. Geriatric Cardiol. JGC. 14, 369 (2017).
Shen, J. et al. Mediterranean dietary patterns and cardiovascular health. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 35, 425–449 (2015).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-011215-025104
Kousta, S. Diet changes for longevity. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3, 780–780 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0705-4
Chiles, R. M. & Fitzgerald, A. J. Why is meat so important in western history and culture? A genealogical critique of biophysical and political-economic explanations. Agric. Hum. Values. 35, 1–17 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/s10460-017-9787-7
Buchholz, K. Eating meat is the norm almost everywhere. https://www.statista.com/chart/24899/meat-consumption-by-country/ (2023).
Wunsch, N. G. Share of young adults who are vegetarian or vegan in selected European countries in 2022. https://www.statista.com/forecasts/768475/vegetarianism-and-veganism-among-young-adults-in-selected-european-countries (2023).
Koch, F., Krems, C., Heuer, T. & Claupein, E. Attitudes, perceptions and behaviours regarding meat consumption in Germany: Results of the NEMONIT study. J. Nutr. Sci. 10, e39 (2021).
doi: 10.1017/jns.2021.34
Sharps, M. A., Fallon, V., Ryan, S. & Coulthard, H. The role of perceived descriptive and injunctive norms on the self-reported frequency of meat and plant-based meal intake in UK-based adults. Appetite. 167, 105615 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105615
Weiper, M. L. & Vonk, R. A communicational approach to enhance open-mindedness towards meat-refusers. Appetite. 167, 105602 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105602
Ge, J., Scalco, A. & Craig, T. Social influence and meat-eating behaviour. Sustainability. 14, 7935 (2022).
doi: 10.3390/su14137935
GFI. Meat Consumption and Attitudes Towards Sustainable Proteins in Europe https://gfieurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Meat-consumption-and-attitudes-to-sustainable-proteins-in-Europe.pdf (2022).
SmartProtein, P. What Consumers Want: A Survey on European Consumer Attitudes Towards Plant-Based Foods, with a Focus on Flexitarians’ European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (No 862957) (2021).
Markowski, K. L., Roxburgh, S. & If I became a vegan, my family and friends would hate me: Anticipating vegan stigma as a barrier to plant-based diets. Appetite. 135, 1–9 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.12.040
MacInnis, C. C. & Hodson, G. It ain’t easy eating greens: Evidence of bias toward vegetarians and vegans from both source and target. Group. Process. Intergroup Relat.. 20, 721–744 (2017).
doi: 10.1177/1368430215618253
Rosenfeld, D. L. & Tomiyama, A. J. When vegetarians eat meat: Why vegetarians violate their diets and how they feel about doing so. Appetite. 143, 104417 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104417
Salmivaara, L., Niva, M., Silfver, M. & Vainio, A. How vegans and vegetarians negotiate eating-related social norm conflicts in their social networks. Appetite. 175, 106081 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106081
Bolderdijk, J. W. & Cornelissen, G. How do you know someone’s vegan? They won’t always tell you. An empirical test of the do-gooder’s dilemma. Appetite. 168, 105719 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105719
Hodson, G. & Earle, M. Conservatism predicts lapses from vegetarian/vegan diets to meat consumption (through lower social justice concerns and social support). Appetite. 120, 75–81 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.08.027
Souza, L. G. S. & O’Dwyer, E. Animal rights, environment, or health? Effects of argument type and dissonance on the attitudes toward the consumption of animals. Appetite. 176, 106129 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106129
Patel, V. & Buckland, N. J. Perceptions about meat reducers: results from two UK studies exploring personality impressions and perceived group membership. Food Qual. Prefer. 93, 104289 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104289
Cramwinckel, F. M., van Dijk, E., Scheepers, D. & van den Bos, K. The threat of moral refusers for one’s self-concept and the protective function of physical cleansing. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 49, 1049–1058 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.07.009
Brouwer, C., Bolderdijk, J., Cornelissen, G. & Kurz, T. Communication strategies for moral rebels: how to talk about change in order to inspire self-efficacy in others. WIREs Clim. Change. 13, e781 (2022).
doi: 10.1002/wcc.781
Rosenfeld, D. L. & Burrow, A. L. Vegetarian on purpose: Understanding the motivations of plant-based dieters. Appetite. 116, 456–463 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.039
Graça, J., Calheiros, M. M. & Oliveira, A. Attached to meat?(Un) willingness and intentions to adopt a more plant-based diet. Appetite. 95, 113–125 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.06.024
Judge, M. & Wilson, M. S. A dual-process motivational model of attitudes towards vegetarians and vegans. Euro. J. Soc. Psych. 49, 169–178 (2019).
doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2386
YouGov. Dietary Choices of Brits (e.g. Vegeterian, Flexitarian, Meat-Eater etc)? https://yougov.co.uk/topics/society/trackers/dietery-choices-of-brits-eg-vegeterian-flexitarian-meat-eater-etc (2023).
Smillie, L. D., Ruby, M. B., Tan, N. P., Stollard, L. & Bastian, B. Differential responses to ethical vegetarian appeals: Exploring the role of traits, beliefs, and motives. J. Pers. 92, 800–819 (2024).
doi: 10.1111/jopy.12866
De Groeve, B., Rosenfeld, D. L., Bleys, B. & Hudders, L. Moralistic stereotyping of vegans: The role of dietary motivation and advocacy status. Appetite. 174, 106006 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106006
Hielkema, M. H. & Lund, T. B. Reducing meat consumption in meat-loving Denmark: Exploring willingness, behavior, barriers and drivers. Food Qual. Prefer. 93, 104257 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104257
Timmons, S. & Lunn, P. Public Understanding of Climate Change and Support for Mitigation. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/268069 (2022).
Hartmann, C., Furtwaengler, P. & Siegrist, M. Consumers’ evaluation of the environmental friendliness, healthiness and naturalness of meat, meat substitutes, and other protein-rich foods. Food Qual. Prefer. 97, 104486 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104486
Hartmann, C., Lazzarini, G., Funk, A. & Siegrist, M. Measuring consumers’ knowledge of the environmental impact of foods. Appetite. 167, 105622 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105622
Monin, B., Sawyer, P. J. & Marquez, M. J. The rejection of moral rebels: Resenting those who do the right thing. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 95, 76 (2008).
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.76
Watson, D. & Clark, L. A. The PANAS-X: Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form. (1994).
Bates, D. Linear mixed model implementation in lme4. Manuscr. Univ. Wis. 15, 5–2 (2007).
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Multiple hypotheses testing with weights. Scand. J. Stat. 24 (3), 407–418 (1997).
doi: 10.1111/1467-9469.00072