High prevalence of chromosome 17 in breast cancer micronuclei: a means to get rid of tumor suppressors?


Journal

Human cell
ISSN: 1749-0774
Titre abrégé: Hum Cell
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 8912329

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 29 07 2024
accepted: 17 10 2024
medline: 23 10 2024
pubmed: 23 10 2024
entrez: 22 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Micronuclei (MN), defined as small extra-nuclear chromatin bodies enclosed by a nuclear envelope, serve as noticeable markers of chromosomal instability (CIN). The MN have been used for breast cancer (BC) screening, diagnosis, and prognosis. However, more recently they have gained attention as seats for active chromosomal rearrangements. BC subtypes exhibit differential CIN levels and aggressiveness. This study aimed to investigate MN chromosomal contents across BC subtypes, exploring its potential role in aggressiveness and pathogenesis. Immunostaining of BC cells was performed with anti-centromeric antibody followed by confocal microscopy. Further, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was done to check the presence of specific chromosomes in the MN. The real time PCR was also done from the RNA isolated from MN to check the expression of TP53 gene. BC cell lines (CLs) showed the presence of both centromere-positive ( +) and -negative ( -) MN, with significant variation in frequency among hormone and human epidermal growth factor receptor positive and triple-negative (TN) BC cells. FISH targeting chromosomes 1, 3, 8, 11, and 17 detected centromeric signals for all the above chromosomes in MN with a relatively higher prevalence of chromosome 17 in all the CLs. Out of all the CLs, TNBC cells demonstrated the highest frequency of centromere + and chromosome 17 + MN. TP53 expression could also be demonstrated inside the MN by FISH and real time PCR. Patient sample imprints also confirmed the presence of chromosome 17 in MN with polysomy of the same in corresponding nuclei. The high prevalence of chromosome 17 in BC MN may connote the importance of its rearrangements in the pathogenesis of BC. Further, the higher prevalence of chromosome 17 and 1 signals in TNBC MN point towards the significance of pathogenetic events involving the genes located in these chromosomes in evolution of this more aggressive phenotype.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39438374
doi: 10.1007/s13577-024-01143-1
pii: 10.1007/s13577-024-01143-1
doi:

Substances chimiques

Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

5

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Human Cell Society.

Références

Arnold M, Morgan E, Rumgay H, Mafra A, Singh D, Laversanne M, et al. Current and future burden of breast cancer: global statistics for 2020 and 2040. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2022;66:15–23.
pubmed: 36084384 doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.08.010
Yadav R, Kumar Y, Dahiya D, Bhatia A. Claudins: the newly emerging targets in breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2022;22(8):737–52.
pubmed: 36175290 doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.09.001
Orrantia-Borunda E, Anchondo-Nuñez P, Acuña-Aguilar LE, Gómez-Valles FO, Ramírez-Valdespino CA. Subtypes of breast cancer. In: Mayrovitz HN, editors. Breast Cancer. Brisbane (AU). Exon Publications
Kwon M, Leibowitz ML, Lee J-H. Small but mighty: the causes and consequences of micronucleus rupture. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52(11):1777–86.
pubmed: 33230251 pmcid: 8080619 doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-00529-z
Krupina K, Goginashvili A, Cleveland DW. Causes and consequences of micronuclei. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2021;70:91–9.
pubmed: 33610905 pmcid: 8119331 doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2021.01.004
Terradas M, Martín M, Tusell L, Genescà A. Genetic activities in micronuclei: is the DNA entrapped in micronuclei lost for the cell? Mutat Res/Rev Mutat Res. 2010;705(1):60–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2010.03.004
Bhatia A, Kumar Y. Cancer cell micronucleus: an update on clinical and diagnostic applications. APMIS. 2013;121(7):569–81.
pubmed: 23278233 doi: 10.1111/apm.12033
Kumari L, Kumar Y, Bhatia A. The link between chromosomal instability and immunity in cancer. In: Rezaei N, editor. Handbook of Cancer and Immunology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 1–20.
Mateuca R, Lombaert N, Aka PV, Decordier I, Kirsch-Volders M. Chromosomal changes: induction, detection methods and applicability in human biomonitoring. Biochimie. 2006;88(11):1515–31.
pubmed: 16919864 doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2006.07.004
Worrall JT, Tamura N, Mazzagatti A, Shaikh N, van Lingen T, Bakker B, et al. Non-random mis-segregation of human chromosomes. Cell Rep. 2018;23(11):3366–80.
pubmed: 29898405 pmcid: 6019738 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.047
Anjur-Dietrich MI, Kelleher CP, Needleman DJ. Mechanical mechanisms of chromosome segregation. Cells. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10020465 .
doi: 10.3390/cells10020465 pubmed: 33671543 pmcid: 7926803
Ly P, Brunner SF, Shoshani O, Kim DH, Lan W, Pyntikova T, et al. Chromosome segregation errors generate a diverse spectrum of simple and complex genomic rearrangements. Nat Genet. 2019;51(4):705–15.
pubmed: 30833795 pmcid: 6441390 doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0360-8
Wilhelm T, Olziersky A-M, Harry D, De Sousa F, Vassal H, Eskat A, et al. Mild replication stress causes chromosome mis-segregation via premature centriole disengagement. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3585.
pubmed: 31395887 pmcid: 6687892 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11584-0
Santaguida S, Amon A. Short- and long-term effects of chromosome mis-segregation and aneuploidy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015;16(8):473–85.
pubmed: 26204159 doi: 10.1038/nrm4025
Zhang CZ, Spektor A, Cornils H, Francis JM, Jackson EK, Liu S, et al. Chromothripsis from DNA damage in micronuclei. Nature. 2015;522(7555):179–84.
pubmed: 26017310 pmcid: 4742237 doi: 10.1038/nature14493
Kumari L, Yadav R, Kaur D, Dey P, Bhatia A. An image analysis approach to characterize micronuclei differences in different subtypes of breast cancer. Pathol—Res Pract. 2024;254:155126.
pubmed: 38228038 doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155126
Mohr L, Toufektchan E, von Morgen P, Chu K, Kapoor A, Maciejowski J. ER-directed TREX1 limits cGAS activation at micronuclei. Mol Cell. 2021;81(4):724-38.e9.
pubmed: 33476576 pmcid: 7897315 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.12.037
Zhang W, Yu Y. The important molecular markers on chromosome 17 and their clinical impact in breast cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2011;12(9):5672–83.
pubmed: 22016618 pmcid: 3189742 doi: 10.3390/ijms12095672
Bochtler T, Kartal-Kaess M, Granzow M, Hielscher T, Cosenza MR, Herold-Mende C, et al. Micronucleus formation in human cancer cells is biased by chromosome size. Genes Chromosom Cancer. 2019;58(6):392–5.
pubmed: 30411433 doi: 10.1002/gcc.22707
Ben-David U, Amon A. Context is everything: aneuploidy in cancer. Nat Rev Genet. 2020;21(1):44–62.
pubmed: 31548659 doi: 10.1038/s41576-019-0171-x
Simonetti G, Bruno S, Padella A, Tenti E, Martinelli G. Aneuploidy: cancer strength or vulnerability? Int J Cancer. 2019;144(1):8–25.
pubmed: 29981145 doi: 10.1002/ijc.31718
Taylor AM, Shih J, Ha G, Gao GF, Zhang X, Berger AC, et al. Genomic and functional approaches to understanding cancer aneuploidy. Cancer Cell. 2018;33(4):676-89.e3.
pubmed: 29622463 pmcid: 6028190 doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.03.007
Kopp B, Khoury L, Audebert M. Validation of the γH2AX biomarker for genotoxicity assessment: a review. Arch Toxicol. 2019;93(8):2103–14.
pubmed: 31289893 doi: 10.1007/s00204-019-02511-9
Upadhyay M, Verma P, Sabharwal R, Subudhi SK, Jatol-Tekade S, Naphade V, et al. Micronuclei in exfoliated cells: a biomarker of genotoxicity in tobacco users. Niger J Surg. 2019;25(1):52–9.
pubmed: 31007513 pmcid: 6452766 doi: 10.4103/njs.NJS_10_18
Sherashiya PA, Nagaraj T, Hemavathy S, Yogesh T, Goswami RD, Bhavana TV. Micronuclei as prognostic marker: a clinicopathologic study. J Med Radiol Pathol Surg. 2016;2:5–8.
doi: 10.15713/ins.jmrps.43
Guo X, Dai X, Wu X, Cao N, Wang X. Small but strong: Mutational and functional landscapes of micronuclei in cancer genomes. Int J Cancer. 2021;148(4):812–24.
pubmed: 32949152 doi: 10.1002/ijc.33300
Guo X, Dai X, Wu X, Zhou T, Ni J, Xue J, et al. Understanding the birth of rupture-prone and irreparable micronuclei. Chromosoma. 2020;129:181–200.
pubmed: 32671520 doi: 10.1007/s00412-020-00741-w
Kwon J, Bakhoum SF. The cytosolic DNA-sensing cGAS-STING pathway in cancer. Cancer Discov. 2020;10(1):26–39.
pubmed: 31852718 doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-0761
Miyazaki K, Ichikawa Y, Saitoh N, Saitoh HJC. Three types of nuclear envelope assemblies associated with micronuclei. CellBio. 2020;9(1):14–28.
doi: 10.4236/cellbio.2020.91002
Hatch Emily M, Fischer Andrew H, Deerinck Thomas J, Hetzer MW. Catastrophic nuclear envelope collapse in cancer cell micronuclei. Cell. 2013;154(1):47–60.
pubmed: 23827674 pmcid: 3749778 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.007
Liao Y-Y, Cao W-M. The progress in our understanding of CIN in breast cancer research. Front Oncol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1067735 .
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1067735 pubmed: 38375202 pmcid: 10773885
Haynes BM, Cunningham K, Shekhar MPV. RAD6 inhibition enhances paclitaxel sensitivity of triple negative breast cancer cells by aggravating mitotic spindle damage. BMC Cancer. 2022;22(1):1073.
pubmed: 36258187 pmcid: 9578210 doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10119-z
Shoshani O, Brunner SF, Yaeger R, Ly P, Nechemia-Arbely Y, Kim DH, et al. Chromothripsis drives the evolution of gene amplification in cancer. Nature. 2021;591(7848):137–41.
pubmed: 33361815 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03064-z
Klaasen SJ, Truong MA, van Jaarsveld RH, Koprivec I, Štimac V, de Vries SG, et al. Nuclear chromosome locations dictate segregation error frequencies. Nature. 2022;607(7919):604–9.
pubmed: 35831506 pmcid: 9300461 doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04938-0
Turner KM, Deshpande V, Beyter D, Koga T, Rusert J, Lee C, et al. Extrachromosomal oncogene amplification drives tumour evolution and genetic heterogeneity. Nature. 2017;543(7643):122–5.
pubmed: 28178237 pmcid: 5334176 doi: 10.1038/nature21356
Duijf PHG, Nanayakkara D, Nones K, Srihari S, Kalimutho M, Khanna KK. Mechanisms of genomic instability in breast cancer. Trends Mol Med. 2019;25(7):595–611.
pubmed: 31078431 doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2019.04.004
Granetto C, Ottaggio L, Abbondandolo A, Bonatti S. p53 accumulates in micronuclei after treatment with a DNA breaking chemical, methylnitrosourea, and with the spindle poison, vinblastine. Mutat Res/Fundam Mol Mech Mutagenesis. 1996;352(1):61–4.
doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(95)00235-9
Sablina AA, Ilyinskaya GV, Rubtsova SN, Agapova LS, ChumakovKopnin PM, et al. Activation of p53-mediated cell cycle checkpoint in response to micronuclei formation. J Cell Sci. 1998;111(7):977–84.
pubmed: 9490641 doi: 10.1242/jcs.111.7.977
Orsetti B, Nugoli M, Cervera N, Lasorsa L, Chuchana P, Rougé C, et al. Genetic profiling of chromosome 1 in breast cancer: mapping of regions of gains and losses and identification of candidate genes on 1q. Br J Cancer. 2006;95(10):1439–47.
pubmed: 17060936 pmcid: 2360604 doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603433
Fougner C, Bergholtz H, Norum JH, Sørlie T. Re-definition of claudin-low as a breast cancer phenotype. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1787.
pubmed: 32286297 pmcid: 7156396 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15574-5
Dias K, Dvorkin-Gheva A, Hallett RM, Wu Y, Hassell J, Pond GR, et al. Claudin-low breast cancer; clinical & pathological characteristics. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(1):e0168669.
pubmed: 28045912 pmcid: 5207440 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168669
Bakhoum SF, Ngo B, Laughney AM, Cavallo JA, Murphy CJ, Ly P, et al. Chromosomal instability drives metastasis through a cytosolic DNA response. Nature. 2018;553(7689):467–72.
pubmed: 29342134 pmcid: 5785464 doi: 10.1038/nature25432
Stephens PJ, Greenman CD, Fu B, Yang F, Bignell GR, Mudie LJ, et al. Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development. Cell. 2011;144(1):27–40.
pubmed: 21215367 pmcid: 3065307 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.055
Crasta K, Ganem NJ, Dagher R, Lantermann AB, Ivanova EV, Pan Y, et al. DNA breaks and chromosome pulverization from errors in mitosis. Nature. 2012;482(7383):53–8.
pubmed: 22258507 pmcid: 3271137 doi: 10.1038/nature10802
Jiang H, Bai X, Meng F, Zhang C, Zhang X. Evaluation of chromosome 17 polysomy in breast cancer by FISH analysis of whole nuclei, and its clinicopathological significance. Oncol Lett. 2014;7(6):1954–8.
pubmed: 24932267 pmcid: 4049721 doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2001

Auteurs

Laxmi Kumari (L)

Department of Experimental Medicine and Biotechnology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Sreejesh Sreedharanunni (S)

Department of Haematology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Divya Dahiya (D)

Department of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Pranab Dey (P)

Department of Cytology and Gynaecological Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Alka Bhatia (A)

Department of Experimental Medicine and Biotechnology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India. alkabhatia@ymail.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH