Low tourniquet pressure has less impact on lower extremity nerve innervation: comparison of different tourniquet pressures used with intraoperative neuromonitoring with a randomized controlled study.
Humans
Tourniquets
Middle Aged
Adult
Male
Female
Pressure
Prospective Studies
Aged
Young Adult
Lower Extremity
/ innervation
Adolescent
Femoral Nerve
/ physiology
Foot
/ innervation
Evoked Potentials, Motor
/ physiology
Ankle
/ innervation
Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring
/ methods
Monitoring, Intraoperative
/ methods
Nerve injury
Neuromonitoring
Quadriceps denervation
Quadriceps tendon thickness
Tourniquet
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
ISSN: 1749-799X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265112
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Oct 2024
23 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
16
08
2024
accepted:
13
10
2024
medline:
24
10
2024
pubmed:
24
10
2024
entrez:
24
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We aimed to investigate the compression and ischemic effects of two different tourniquet pressures on tissues during surgery show a clinical difference. Patients aged 18-65 years who underwent foot and ankle surgery and applied a tourniquet in a single center between September 2022 and November 2023 were included in this prospective randomized study. Accordingly, tourniquet pressures were applied as limb occlusion pressure (LOP) + 50 mmHg in group 1 (12 patients) and LOP + 100 mmHg in group 2 (12 patients). The time point at which the femoral nerve motor evoked potential (MEP) decreased by 50%, the time point at which the MEP decreased by 100% for all nerves (femoral, tibial, and deep peroneal), and the time point at which all responses returned after the tourniquet was deflated were identified as the time points for analysis. There were no differences in demographic data (age, body mass index, and sex) between the two groups. The mean tourniquet pressure was 191 ± 16 mmHg in Group 1 and 247 ± 21 mmHg in Group 2 (p < 0.001). A 50% decrease in the femoral nerve MEP value was observed at an average of 47 min in Group 1 and 34 min in Group 2 (p < 0.001). A complete loss of MEP responses for all nerves was observed at an average of 69 min in Group 1 and 56 min in Group 2. After the tourniquet was deflated, all MEP responses returned to baseline values at an average of 8.5 min in Group 1 and 12.6 min in Group 2 (p = 0.007). The results showed that lower limb nerve innervation was affected later and returned to normal earlier after deflation of the tourniquet in Group 1 (low tourniquet pressure group). The innervations of the lower extremity nerves were affected later in the group in which low tourniquet pressure was applied (average 191 mmHg). Again, in this group (LOP + 50 mmHg), nerve conduction recovered an average of 10 min after deflation and four minutes earlier than in the high tourniquet pressure group. Level I, diagnostic study. NCT05926154.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
We aimed to investigate the compression and ischemic effects of two different tourniquet pressures on tissues during surgery show a clinical difference.
METHODS
METHODS
Patients aged 18-65 years who underwent foot and ankle surgery and applied a tourniquet in a single center between September 2022 and November 2023 were included in this prospective randomized study. Accordingly, tourniquet pressures were applied as limb occlusion pressure (LOP) + 50 mmHg in group 1 (12 patients) and LOP + 100 mmHg in group 2 (12 patients). The time point at which the femoral nerve motor evoked potential (MEP) decreased by 50%, the time point at which the MEP decreased by 100% for all nerves (femoral, tibial, and deep peroneal), and the time point at which all responses returned after the tourniquet was deflated were identified as the time points for analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
There were no differences in demographic data (age, body mass index, and sex) between the two groups. The mean tourniquet pressure was 191 ± 16 mmHg in Group 1 and 247 ± 21 mmHg in Group 2 (p < 0.001). A 50% decrease in the femoral nerve MEP value was observed at an average of 47 min in Group 1 and 34 min in Group 2 (p < 0.001). A complete loss of MEP responses for all nerves was observed at an average of 69 min in Group 1 and 56 min in Group 2. After the tourniquet was deflated, all MEP responses returned to baseline values at an average of 8.5 min in Group 1 and 12.6 min in Group 2 (p = 0.007). The results showed that lower limb nerve innervation was affected later and returned to normal earlier after deflation of the tourniquet in Group 1 (low tourniquet pressure group).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The innervations of the lower extremity nerves were affected later in the group in which low tourniquet pressure was applied (average 191 mmHg). Again, in this group (LOP + 50 mmHg), nerve conduction recovered an average of 10 min after deflation and four minutes earlier than in the high tourniquet pressure group.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
METHODS
Level I, diagnostic study.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
NCT05926154.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39444003
doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05176-y
pii: 10.1186/s13018-024-05176-y
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05926154']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
684Subventions
Organisme : Istanbul Üniversitesi
ID : TTU-2022-38873
Organisme : Istanbul Üniversitesi
ID : TTU-2022-38873
Organisme : Istanbul Üniversitesi
ID : TTU-2022-38873
Organisme : Istanbul Üniversitesi
ID : TTU-2022-38873
Organisme : Istanbul Üniversitesi
ID : TTU-2022-38873
Organisme : Istanbul Üniversitesi
ID : TTU-2022-38873
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Fitzgibbons PG, Digiovanni C, Hares S, Akelman E. Safe tourniquet use: a review of the evidence. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012;20(5):310–9.
doi: 10.5435/00124635-201205000-00007
pubmed: 22553103
Liu Y, Si H, Zeng Y, Li M, Xie H, Shen B. More pain and slower functional recovery when a tourniquet is used during total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(6):1842–60.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05617-w
Jensen J, Hicks RW, Labovitz J. Understanding and optimizing Tourniquet Use during extremity surgery. AORN J. 2019;109(2):171–82.
doi: 10.1002/aorn.12579
pubmed: 30694553
Noordin S, McEwen JA, Kragh JFJ, Eisen A, Masri BA. Surgical tourniquets in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(12):2958–67.
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00634
pubmed: 19952261
Horlocker TT, Hebl JR, Gali B, et al. Anesthetic, patient, and surgical risk factors for neurologic complications after prolonged total tourniquet time during total knee arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(3):950–5.
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000194875.05587.7e
pubmed: 16492857
Olivecrona C, Lapidus LJ, Benson L, Blomfeldt R. Tourniquet time affects postoperative complications after knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2013;37(5):827–32.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1826-4
pubmed: 23417522
pmcid: 3631475
Saunders KC, Louis DL, Weingarden SI, Waylonis GW. Effect of tourniquet time on postoperative quadriceps function. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;(143):194–9.
Graham B, Breault MJ, McEwen JA, McGraw RW. Occlusion of arterial flow in the extremities at subsystolic pressures through the use of wide tourniquet cuffs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:257–61.
doi: 10.1097/00003086-199301000-00038
McLain RFSF. Intraoperative nonparalytic monitoring. In: Edward C, Benzel TBF, editors. Spine surgery: techniques, complication avoidance, and management. 3 ed. rd. Elsevier /Saunders; 2012. pp. 1701–3.
Ian Beggs. Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Technical Guidelines V.Knee. Published 2016. https://essr.org/content-essr/uploads/2016/10/knee.pdf
Araujo P, van Eck CF, Torabi M, Fu FH. How to optimize the use of MRI in anatomic ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(7):1495–501.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2153-9
pubmed: 22893266
Xerogeanes JW, Mitchell PM, Karasev PA, Kolesov IA, Romine SE. Anatomic and morphological evaluation of the quadriceps tendon using 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging reconstruction: applications for anterior cruciate ligament autograft choice and procurement. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(10):2392–9.
doi: 10.1177/0363546513496626
pubmed: 23893419
Nadler SB, Hidalgo JH, Bloch T. Prediction of blood volume in normal human adults. Surgery. 1962;51(2):224–32.
pubmed: 21936146
Meunier A, Petersson A, Good L, Berlin G. Validation of a haemoglobin dilution method for estimation of blood loss. Vox Sang. 2008;95(2):120–4.
doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2008.01071.x
pubmed: 18510580
Nitz AJ, Matulionis DH. Ultrastructural changes in rat peripheral nerve following pneumatic tourniquet compression. J Neurosurg. 1982;57(5):660–6.
doi: 10.3171/jns.1982.57.5.0660
pubmed: 6290621
Pinsornsak P, Pinitchanon P, Boontanapibul K. Effect of different Tourniquet pressure on Postoperative Pain and complications after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36(5):1638–44.
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.049
pubmed: 33509602
Klich S, Ficek K, Krymski I, et al. Quadriceps and patellar Tendon thickness and stiffness in Elite Track cyclists: an Ultrasonographic and myotonometric evaluation. Front Physiol. 2020;11:607208.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.607208
pubmed: 33381054
pmcid: 7767861
de Boer MD, Selby A, Atherton P, et al. The temporal responses of protein synthesis, gene expression and cell signalling in human quadriceps muscle and patellar tendon to disuse. J Physiol. 2007;585(Pt 1):241–51.
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.142828
pubmed: 17901116
pmcid: 2375459