Sweet enhancers of polymerase chain reaction.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
10
05
2024
accepted:
28
09
2024
medline:
29
10
2024
pubmed:
29
10
2024
entrez:
29
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although faster and powerful, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) often failed to amplify targets efficiently. Numerous PCR enhancers have been used to increase the amplification efficiency of difficult DNA targets. However, there is no systematic comparison of their effects in normal and difficult PCR conditions. In this paper, we have selected nine different PCR enhancers that can promote the PCR amplification efficiency. We have compared their effect in Taq DNA polymerase thermostability, inhibitor resistance, and amplification of various DNA targets. Although the PCR enhancers more or less reduced the amplification efficiency of DNA fragments with moderate GC-content, they were able to improve the amplification efficiency and specificity of GC-rich fragments. Betaine outperformed the other enhancers in amplification of GC-rich DNA fragments, thermostabilizing Taq DNA polymerase, and inhibitor tolerance. Sucrose and trehalose showed similar effect in thermostabilizing Taq DNA polymerase and inhibitor tolerance, while they showed mildest inhibitory effect on normal PCR. For GC-rich region-containing long DNA fragment amplification, 1 M betaine, 0.5 M betaine + 0.2 M sucrose, or 1 M betaine + 0.1 M sucrose can be used to effectively promote the amplification, while keep their negative effect in amplification of normal fragment to a minimal level.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39471151
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311939
pii: PONE-D-24-18753
pmc: PMC11521273
doi:
Substances chimiques
Betaine
3SCV180C9W
Trehalose
B8WCK70T7I
Sucrose
57-50-1
Taq Polymerase
EC 2.7.7.-
DNA
9007-49-2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0311939Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2024 Xie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Clin Chem. 2014 Feb;60(2):334-40
pubmed: 24081987
Biotechniques. 2009 Sep;47(3):775-9
pubmed: 19852763
Clin Chem. 2004 Jul;50(7):1256-9
pubmed: 15229160
Front Microbiol. 2014 Aug 29;5:465
pubmed: 25221550
Trends Biotechnol. 2004 May;22(5):253-60
pubmed: 15109812
Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Dec 25;18(24):7465
pubmed: 2259646
J Mol Diagn. 2010 Mar;12(2):152-61
pubmed: 20075207
Biosci Rep. 2011 Feb;31(1):17-30
pubmed: 20353401
J Appl Microbiol. 2012 Nov;113(5):1014-26
pubmed: 22747964
Genome Res. 1996 Jul;6(7):633-8
pubmed: 8796351
Anal Biochem. 2020 Oct 1;606:113858
pubmed: 32738210
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Oct 1;25(19):3957-8
pubmed: 9380524
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 28;6:28769
pubmed: 27349576
Biochimie. 2022 Jun;197:130-143
pubmed: 35231536
Anal Chem. 2010 Jul 15;82(14):6303-7
pubmed: 20565067
Science. 1988 Jan 29;239(4839):487-91
pubmed: 2448875
BMC Biotechnol. 2011 Apr 18;11:41
pubmed: 21501492
Science. 1985 Dec 20;230(4732):1350-4
pubmed: 2999980
Biochemistry. 1993 Jan 12;32(1):137-44
pubmed: 8418834