Unravelling alternative splicing patterns in susceptible and resistant Brassica napus lines in response to Xanthomonas campestris infection.
Brassica napus
Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris
Alternative splicing
Black rot resistance
RNA-seq
Journal
BMC plant biology
ISSN: 1471-2229
Titre abrégé: BMC Plant Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967807
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Oct 2024
30 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
20
12
2023
accepted:
18
10
2024
medline:
30
10
2024
pubmed:
30
10
2024
entrez:
30
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) is an important oil and industrial crop worldwide. Black rot caused by the bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) is an infectious vascular disease that leads to considerable yield losses in rapeseed. Resistance improvement through genetic breeding is an effective and sustainable approach to control black rot disease in B. napus. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying Brassica-Xcc interactions are not yet fully understood, especially regarding the impact of post-transcriptional gene regulation via alternative splicing (AS). In this study, we compared the AS landscapes of a susceptible parental line and two mutagenized B. napus lines with contrasting levels of black rot resistance. Different types of AS events were identified in these B. napus lines at three time points upon Xcc infection, among which intron retention was the most common AS type. A total of 1,932 genes was found to show differential AS patterns between different B. napus lines. Multiple defense-related differential alternative splicing (DAS) hub candidates were pinpointed through an isoform-based co-expression network analysis, including genes involved in pathogen recognition, defense signalling, transcriptional regulation, and oxidation reduction. This study provides new insights into the potential effects of post-transcriptional regulation on immune responses in B. napus towards Xcc attack. These findings could be beneficial for the genetic improvement of B. napus to achieve durable black rot resistance in the future.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) is an important oil and industrial crop worldwide. Black rot caused by the bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) is an infectious vascular disease that leads to considerable yield losses in rapeseed. Resistance improvement through genetic breeding is an effective and sustainable approach to control black rot disease in B. napus. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying Brassica-Xcc interactions are not yet fully understood, especially regarding the impact of post-transcriptional gene regulation via alternative splicing (AS).
RESULTS
RESULTS
In this study, we compared the AS landscapes of a susceptible parental line and two mutagenized B. napus lines with contrasting levels of black rot resistance. Different types of AS events were identified in these B. napus lines at three time points upon Xcc infection, among which intron retention was the most common AS type. A total of 1,932 genes was found to show differential AS patterns between different B. napus lines. Multiple defense-related differential alternative splicing (DAS) hub candidates were pinpointed through an isoform-based co-expression network analysis, including genes involved in pathogen recognition, defense signalling, transcriptional regulation, and oxidation reduction.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This study provides new insights into the potential effects of post-transcriptional regulation on immune responses in B. napus towards Xcc attack. These findings could be beneficial for the genetic improvement of B. napus to achieve durable black rot resistance in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39472805
doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05728-8
pii: 10.1186/s12870-024-05728-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1027Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2020 Jan;84(1):76-84
pubmed: 31478783
Curr Biol. 2002 Apr 30;12(9):757-61
pubmed: 12007421
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30619
pubmed: 22312429
DNA Res. 2017 Apr 1;24(2):205-217
pubmed: 28025318
PLoS Pathog. 2013 Jan;9(1):e1003127
pubmed: 23382673
BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Jan 27;14:37
pubmed: 24467952
Plant Physiol. 2016 Jun;171(2):1427-42
pubmed: 27208272
Plant Cell. 2012 Jun;24(6):2427-42
pubmed: 22715042
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Feb 11;111(6):2367-72
pubmed: 24477691
Plant Physiol. 2018 Jan;176(1):340-351
pubmed: 28931630
Nat Methods. 2015 Apr;12(4):357-60
pubmed: 25751142
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Oct 13;13:1009998
pubmed: 36311064
Science. 2009 Jan 2;323(5910):95-101
pubmed: 19095898
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 23;111(51):E5593-601
pubmed: 25480548
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jul;35(Web Server issue):W297-9
pubmed: 17485470
Genome Res. 2012 Jun;22(6):1184-95
pubmed: 22391557
Plant Cell Rep. 2007 Aug;26(8):1357-66
pubmed: 17380304
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Aug 29;13:960874
pubmed: 36105711
PLoS Genet. 2015 Jul 21;11(7):e1005373
pubmed: 26197346
Plant Cell Physiol. 2019 Sep 1;60(9):1906-1916
pubmed: 31106828
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018 Apr;125:172-177
pubmed: 29455090
Mol Plant. 2014 May;7(5):829-40
pubmed: 24398628
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2015 Apr;24:125-35
pubmed: 25835141
Genes (Basel). 2020 Jul 13;11(7):
pubmed: 32668742
3 Biotech. 2020 Jul;10(7):308
pubmed: 32582505
Molecules. 2013 Sep 11;18(9):11131-43
pubmed: 24029746
Plant Physiol. 2018 Apr;176(4):3046-3061
pubmed: 29449432
Plant Cell. 2014 Mar;26(3):996-1008
pubmed: 24681622
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 2;103(18):7175-80
pubmed: 16632598
Genes (Basel). 2019 Apr 11;10(4):
pubmed: 30979089
Plant Cell. 2014 Sep;26(9):3472-87
pubmed: 25248552
Mol Plant. 2020 Aug 3;13(8):1194-1202
pubmed: 32585190
Mol Plant. 2014 May;7(5):814-28
pubmed: 24431192
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 May 11;118(19):
pubmed: 33941701
Nature. 2008 Nov 27;456(7221):470-6
pubmed: 18978772
Plant J. 2012 Feb;69(3):489-500
pubmed: 21974727
Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Mar;33(3):290-5
pubmed: 25690850
Plant Cell. 2015 Jan;27(1):71-85
pubmed: 25634987
PLoS Genet. 2016 May 13;12(5):e1006049
pubmed: 27176732
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Dec 12;8:2121
pubmed: 29312385
Plant Cell. 2013 Oct;25(10):3657-83
pubmed: 24179125
Science. 2014 Aug 22;345(6199):950-3
pubmed: 25146293
Neurogenesis (Austin). 2016 Jun 23;3(1):e1204844
pubmed: 27606339
Nat Plants. 2020 Aug;6(8):1008-1019
pubmed: 32690890
Rice (N Y). 2022 Aug 3;15(1):41
pubmed: 35920921
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Dec 29;9:559
pubmed: 19114008
Mol Plant Pathol. 2013 Jan;14(1):2-18
pubmed: 23051837
Plant Physiol. 2018 Aug;177(4):1679-1690
pubmed: 29907700
Mol Biol Rep. 2018 Oct;45(5):773-785
pubmed: 29931534