Cost and cost-effectiveness of digital technologies for support of tuberculosis treatment adherence: a systematic review.


Journal

BMJ global health
ISSN: 2059-7908
Titre abrégé: BMJ Glob Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101685275

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 15 03 2024
accepted: 26 09 2024
medline: 31 10 2024
pubmed: 31 10 2024
entrez: 30 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Digital adherence technologies (DATs) may provide a patient-centred approach to supporting tuberculosis (TB) medication adherence and improving treatment outcomes. We synthesised evidence addressing costs and cost-effectiveness of DATs to support TB treatment. A systematic review (PROSPERO-CRD42022313531) identified relevant literature from January 2000 to April 2023 in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science along with preprints from medRxiv, Europe PMC and ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies with observational, experimental or quasi-experimental designs (minimum 20 participants) and modelling studies reporting quantitative data on the cost or cost-effectiveness of DATs for TB infection or disease treatment were included. Study characteristics, cost and cost-effectiveness outcomes were extracted. Of 3619 titles identified by our systematic search, 29 studies met inclusion criteria, of which 9 addressed cost-effectiveness. DATs included short message service (SMS) reminders, phone-based technologies, digital pillboxes, ingestible sensors and video-observed therapy (VOT). VOT was the most extensively studied (16 studies) and was generally cost saving when compared with healthcare provider directly observed therapy (DOT), particularly when costs to patients were included-though findings were largely from high-income countries. Cost-effectiveness findings were highly variable, ranging from no clinical effect in one study (SMS), to greater effectiveness with concurrent cost savings (VOT) in others. Only eight studies adequately reported at least 80% of the elements required by Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards, a standard reporting checklist for health economic evaluations. DATs may be cost saving or cost-effective compared with healthcare provider DOT, particularly in high-income settings. However, more data of higher quality are needed, notably in lower-income and middle-income countries which have the greatest TB burden.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Digital adherence technologies (DATs) may provide a patient-centred approach to supporting tuberculosis (TB) medication adherence and improving treatment outcomes. We synthesised evidence addressing costs and cost-effectiveness of DATs to support TB treatment.
METHODS METHODS
A systematic review (PROSPERO-CRD42022313531) identified relevant literature from January 2000 to April 2023 in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science along with preprints from medRxiv, Europe PMC and ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies with observational, experimental or quasi-experimental designs (minimum 20 participants) and modelling studies reporting quantitative data on the cost or cost-effectiveness of DATs for TB infection or disease treatment were included. Study characteristics, cost and cost-effectiveness outcomes were extracted.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 3619 titles identified by our systematic search, 29 studies met inclusion criteria, of which 9 addressed cost-effectiveness. DATs included short message service (SMS) reminders, phone-based technologies, digital pillboxes, ingestible sensors and video-observed therapy (VOT). VOT was the most extensively studied (16 studies) and was generally cost saving when compared with healthcare provider directly observed therapy (DOT), particularly when costs to patients were included-though findings were largely from high-income countries. Cost-effectiveness findings were highly variable, ranging from no clinical effect in one study (SMS), to greater effectiveness with concurrent cost savings (VOT) in others. Only eight studies adequately reported at least 80% of the elements required by Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards, a standard reporting checklist for health economic evaluations.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
DATs may be cost saving or cost-effective compared with healthcare provider DOT, particularly in high-income settings. However, more data of higher quality are needed, notably in lower-income and middle-income countries which have the greatest TB burden.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39477335
pii: bmjgh-2024-015654
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015654
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antitubercular Agents 0

Types de publication

Systematic Review Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: KS reports research funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. He has also served as chair of the Data Safety and Monitoring Board for a COVID-19 therapeutic investigated by Laurent Pharmaceuticals.

Auteurs

Cedric Kafie (C)

McGill International Tuberculosis Centre, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Mona Salaheldin Mohamed (MS)

McGill International Tuberculosis Centre, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Miranda Zary (M)

McGill International Tuberculosis Centre, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Chimweta Ian Chilala (CI)

TB Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Shruti Bahukudumbi (S)

Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Genevieve Gore (G)

McGill Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences and Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Nicola Foster (N)

TB Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Katherine L Fielding (KL)

TB Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Ramnath Subbaraman (R)

Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Kevin Schwartzman (K)

McGill International Tuberculosis Centre, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada kevin.schwartzman@mcgill.ca.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH