Physical pressure resistance of gastrointestinal anastomotic site via plate of polyglycolic acid promoting fibrosis.
Anastomotic leakage
Animal experiment
Physical pressure resistance
Polyglycolic acid
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 10 2024
30 10 2024
Historique:
received:
30
04
2024
accepted:
25
10
2024
medline:
31
10
2024
pubmed:
31
10
2024
entrez:
31
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Anastomotic-leakage incidence has been reported to be reduced on using polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheets as reinforcing materials; however, there is insufficient evidence regarding the reinforcement mechanism. Therefore, we investigated effects of PGA sheets on gastrointestinal anastomoses in rats. In the first approach, five rats underwent laparotomy; the PGA sheet was pasted onto the normal cecal wall. After five days, the cecum was removed and histologically evaluated. In the second approach, ten rats were randomly divided into two groups of five animals each. The rats underwent laparotomy; the cecal wall was sutured after a full-thickness incision. In the PGA group, a PGA sheet was used to cover the suture area. After 5 days, the cecum was removed, and the physical pressure resistance was evaluated. We confirmed the growth of a fibrous capsule measuring 855 (648-1048) µm outside the cecal serosa in the first approach. The median pressure resistance in the second approach was 57.0 (45.0-90.0) and 90.0 (82.5-94.5) mmHg in Control and PGA groups, respectively. The pressure resistance was significantly higher in the PGA group (p = 0.046). In summary, the PGA sheet may form a barrier of fibrosis on the intestinal wall and provide reinforcement to prevent anastomotic leakage.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39478128
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77894-6
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-77894-6
doi:
Substances chimiques
Polyglycolic Acid
26009-03-0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
26124Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Kang, C. Y. et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. JAMA Surg. 148, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1001/2013.jamasurg.2 (2013).
doi: 10.1001/2013.jamasurg.2
pubmed: 22986932
Ashraf, S. Q. et al. The economic impact of anastomotic leakage after anterior resections in English NHS hospitals: Are we adequately remunerating them? Colorectal Dis. 15, e190–e198. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12125 (2013).
doi: 10.1111/codi.12125
pubmed: 23331871
Wang, S. et al. Adverse effects of anastomotic leakage on local recurrence and survival after curative anterior resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J. Surg. 41, 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3761-1 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3761-1
pubmed: 27743072
Watanabe, T. et al. Prediction model for complications after low anterior resection based on data from 33,411 Japanese patients included in the National Clinical Database. Surgery 161, 1597–1608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.12.011 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.12.011
pubmed: 28153378
Watanabe, J. et al. Blood perfusion assessment by indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery (EssentiAL trial): A randomized clinical trial. Ann. Surg. 278, e688–e694. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005907 (2023).
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005907
pubmed: 37218517
Yang, Y. et al. Prophylactic transanal decompression tube versus non-prophylactic transanal decompression tube for anastomotic leakage prevention in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis. Surg. Endosc. 31, 1513–1523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5193-2 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5193-2
pubmed: 27620910
Maeda, K. et al. Efficacy of intracorporeal reinforcing sutures for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg. Endosc. 29, 3535–3542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4104-2 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4104-2
pubmed: 25673349
Takagi, T., Tsujimoto, H., Torii, H., Ozamoto, Y. & Hagiwara, A. New polyglycolic acid fabric for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistulas. Asian J. Surg. 41, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.08.001 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.08.001
pubmed: 27649862
Kanai, E., Matsutani, N., Aso, T., Yamamoto, Y. & Sakai, T. Long-term effects of pleural defect repair using sheet materials in a canine model. Gen. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 68, 615–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-019-01270-9 (2020).
doi: 10.1007/s11748-019-01270-9
pubmed: 31828518
Shibutani, M., Fukuoka, T., Iseki, Y., Kasashima, H. & Maeda, K. Efficacy of the polyglycolic acid sheet for preventing anastomotic leakage in double-stapling technique anastomosis for left-sided colon or rectal cancer surgery: A propensity score-matched study. BMC Surg. 23, 135. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02044-0 (2023).
doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02044-0
pubmed: 37198625
Trencheva, K. et al. Identifying important predictors for anastomotic leak after colon and rectal resection: Prospective study on 616 patients. Ann. Surg. 257, 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318262a6cd (2013).
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318262a6cd
pubmed: 22968068
Bankhead, P. et al. QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci. Rep. 7, 16878. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17204-5 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17204-5
pubmed: 29203879
pmcid: 5715110
Martens, M. F. & Hendriks, T. Postoperative changes in collagen synthesis in intestinal anastomoses of the rat: Differences between small and large bowel. Gut 32, 1482–1487. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.32.12.1482 (1991).
doi: 10.1136/gut.32.12.1482
pubmed: 1773953
pmcid: 1379247
Sueyoshi, Y., Niwa, A., Nishikawa, Y. & Isogai, N. The significance of nanofiber polyglycolic acid for promoting tissue repair in a rat subcutaneous implantation model. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 111, 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.35128 (2023).
doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.35128
pubmed: 35833260
Choi, S. I. & Park, J. Y. Large anastomotic leak: Endoscopic treatment using combined fibrin glue and polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheets. BMJ Case Rep. 14, e240188. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2020-240188 (2021).
doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-240188
pubmed: 34446509
pmcid: 8395350
Fujiwara, H. et al. The wrapping method using biodegradable felt strips has a preventive effect on the thinning of the aortic wall: Experimental study in the canine aorta. J. Vasc. Surg. 43, 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2005.09.044 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.09.044
pubmed: 16476614
Hasegawa, H., Takeshita, N., Hyon, W., Hyon, S. H. & Ito, M. Novel external reinforcement device for gastrointestinal anastomosis in an experimental study. BMC Surg. 23, 121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02027-1 (2023).
doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02027-1
pubmed: 37170107
pmcid: 10176862
den Dulk, M. et al. Improved diagnosis and treatment of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 35, 420–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2008.04.009 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.04.009
Oxlund, H., Christensen, H., Seyer-Hansen, M. & Andreassen, T. T. Collagen deposition and mechanical strength of colon anastomoses and skin incisional wounds of rats. J. Surg. Res. 66, 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsre.1996.0367 (1996).
doi: 10.1006/jsre.1996.0367
pubmed: 8954827
Rabau, M., Eyal, A., Kluger, Y. & Dayan, D. Bursting pressure in anastomotic healing in experimentally induced colitis in rats. Dis. Colon Rectum 41, 468–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02235761 (1998).
doi: 10.1007/BF02235761
pubmed: 9559632
Santavirta, S. et al. Immune response to polyglycolic acid implants. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 72, 597–600. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.72B4.2166048 (1990).
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B4.2166048
pubmed: 2166048