Use of the Foetal Myocardial Performance Index in monochorionic, diamniotic twin pregnancy: a prospective cohort and nested case-control study.
Doppler ultrasound
Myocardial Performance Index
monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy
selective intrauterine growth restriction
twin–twin transfusion syndrome
Journal
The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians
ISSN: 1476-4954
Titre abrégé: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101136916
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
6
1
2018
medline:
19
6
2019
entrez:
6
1
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Assess clinical utility of the foetal Myocardial Performance Index (MPI) in evaluation and management of monochorionic, diamniotic twin (MCDA) pregnancies. Prospective cohort of (a) initially uncomplicated MCDA (b) Complicated MCDA, including twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), selective intrauterine growth restriction (sIUGR), and liquor and/or growth discordance (L/GD) not meeting TTTS or sIUGR criteria. TTTS and sIUGR were case-control matched. Routine Dopplers and MPI were taken and correlated to diagnosis and final outcome. Twenty-six always uncomplicated pairs, 51 always complicated pairs, and seven uncomplicated to pathological pairs were included. TTTS recipient (n = 25) left and right MPI and intertwin difference (ITD) were significantly elevated, however, were already elevated in Stage I (n = 10), and did not predict progression or pregnancy outcome. sIUGR MPI (n = 11) did not differ significantly from control. Of 15-L/GD pairs, two that progressed to TTTS had significantly higher left and right MPI values in the future recipient (0.61 and 0.72) versus future sIUGR larger twins (0.48 and 0.51) or stable L/GD (0.47 and 0.52): p < .01 for all comparisons. In this cohort, MPI did not add substantial diagnostic/prognostic information to current routine evaluation in established TTTS or sIUGR though potentially differentiated L/GD cases progressing to TTTS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29301441
doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1424817
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM