Initial experience with the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with the real costs of hospitalization analysis in a single Polish center.
Adult
Aged
Cardiology Service, Hospital
/ economics
Death, Sudden, Cardiac
/ prevention & control
Defibrillators, Implantable
/ economics
Diagnostic Tests, Routine
/ economics
Drug Costs
Electric Countershock
/ adverse effects
Female
Hospital Costs
Hospitalization
/ economics
Humans
Length of Stay
/ economics
Male
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Personnel, Hospital
/ economics
Poland
Postoperative Complications
/ economics
Primary Prevention
/ economics
Risk Factors
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
/ economics
Secondary Prevention
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
leadless
primary prevention
procedure cost
secondary prevention
subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
ventricular arrhythmias
Journal
Cardiology journal
ISSN: 1898-018X
Titre abrégé: Cardiol J
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101392712
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
08
12
2017
accepted:
12
02
2018
revised:
11
02
2018
pubmed:
4
4
2018
medline:
7
7
2020
entrez:
4
4
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The recent introduction of an entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibril-lator (S-ICD) represents an important progress in the defibrillation technology towards a less invasive approach. This is a single-center observational study of S-ICD implantations in Poland. The S-ICD was implanted in 11 patients with standard indications for an ICD. Patients in whom the device was implanted were evaluated for adverse events and device function at hospital discharge. All hospitalization costs were calculated and summed up for all patients. Costs were divided into following categories: medical materials, pharmaceuticals, operating theatre staff, cardiology depart-ment staff, laboratory tests, non-laboratory tests and additional non-medical costs. The mean age of patients was 51.6 ± 16.4 years, 9 were men and 2 were women. Four pa-tients had atrial fibrillation as the basal rhythm, 1 patient had atrial flutter and 6 patients had sinus rhythm. All patients had at least one condition that precluded the use of a traditional ICD system or the S-ICD was preferred due to other conditions, i.e. a history complicated transvenous ICD therapy (18%), anticipated higher risk of infection (27%), lack or difficult vascular access (18%), young age and anticipated high cumulated risk of lifetime device therapy (36%). The mean duration of the im-plantation procedure was 2 h. One patient developed a postoperative pocket hematoma. Mean total time of hospitalization was 28 (6-92) days. Average cost of hospitalization per patient was 21,014.29 EUR (minimal = 19,332.71 EUR and maximal = 24,824.14 EUR). S-ICD implantation appears to provide a viable alternative to transvenous ICD, espe-cially for patients without pacing requirements.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The recent introduction of an entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibril-lator (S-ICD) represents an important progress in the defibrillation technology towards a less invasive approach. This is a single-center observational study of S-ICD implantations in Poland.
METHODS
The S-ICD was implanted in 11 patients with standard indications for an ICD. Patients in whom the device was implanted were evaluated for adverse events and device function at hospital discharge. All hospitalization costs were calculated and summed up for all patients. Costs were divided into following categories: medical materials, pharmaceuticals, operating theatre staff, cardiology depart-ment staff, laboratory tests, non-laboratory tests and additional non-medical costs.
RESULTS
The mean age of patients was 51.6 ± 16.4 years, 9 were men and 2 were women. Four pa-tients had atrial fibrillation as the basal rhythm, 1 patient had atrial flutter and 6 patients had sinus rhythm. All patients had at least one condition that precluded the use of a traditional ICD system or the S-ICD was preferred due to other conditions, i.e. a history complicated transvenous ICD therapy (18%), anticipated higher risk of infection (27%), lack or difficult vascular access (18%), young age and anticipated high cumulated risk of lifetime device therapy (36%). The mean duration of the im-plantation procedure was 2 h. One patient developed a postoperative pocket hematoma. Mean total time of hospitalization was 28 (6-92) days. Average cost of hospitalization per patient was 21,014.29 EUR (minimal = 19,332.71 EUR and maximal = 24,824.14 EUR).
CONCLUSIONS
S-ICD implantation appears to provide a viable alternative to transvenous ICD, espe-cially for patients without pacing requirements.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29611175
pii: VM/OJS/J/56417
doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0024
pmc: PMC8084361
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
360-367Références
Eur Heart J. 2012 Jun;33(11):1351-9
pubmed: 22408031
Europace. 2018 Jul 1;20(7):1188-1193
pubmed: 28340026
Europace. 2018 May 1;20(5):887-892
pubmed: 29432525
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 Apr;26(4):417-423
pubmed: 25581303
Eur Heart J. 2015 Nov 1;36(41):2793-2867
pubmed: 26320108
World J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 26;5(9):347-54
pubmed: 24109498
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Dec;6(6):1236-44; discussion 1244-5
pubmed: 24347599
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Jan;10(1):29-36
pubmed: 23032867
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2014 Jan;29(1):10-9
pubmed: 24284982
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Mar;11(3):426-34
pubmed: 24321235
Eur Heart J. 2014 Jul 1;35(25):1657-65
pubmed: 24670710
Clin Res Cardiol. 2011 Sep;100(9):737-44
pubmed: 21416191
Europace. 2013 Aug;15(8):1158-65
pubmed: 23449924
JAMA. 2003 May 28;289(20):2685-94
pubmed: 12771115
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Oct;40(10):1139-1146
pubmed: 28846144
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Nov 6;60(19):1933-9
pubmed: 23062537
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 May;35(5):574-9
pubmed: 22360677
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;228:280-285
pubmed: 27865198
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2014 Dec;4(6):449-59
pubmed: 25610802
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Nov 1;1(8):900-911
pubmed: 27603935
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Feb;30(2):199-206
pubmed: 17338716
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Apr 29;51(17):1685-91
pubmed: 18436121
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jan 21;63(2):133-40
pubmed: 24140671
Circulation. 2013 Feb 12;127(6):749-56
pubmed: 23401116
Circulation. 2004 Oct 26;110(17):2591-6
pubmed: 15492306
Circulation. 2001 Aug 14;104(7):796-801
pubmed: 11502705
Europace. 2016 Sep;18(9):1434-9
pubmed: 27582309
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Feb 2;67(4):445-454
pubmed: 26821634
Circulation. 2013 Aug 27;128(9):938-40
pubmed: 23979625
Heart Rhythm. 2016 May;13(5):1045-1051
pubmed: 26749313
Circulation. 2013 Aug 27;128(9):944-53
pubmed: 23979626
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 15;203:251-8
pubmed: 26519678
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Oct;5(5):913-9
pubmed: 22923274
N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 4;359(10):1009-17
pubmed: 18768944
Kardiol Pol. 2017;75(10):1057-1060
pubmed: 29057442
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Oct;15(10):e190-e252
pubmed: 29097320
Circulation. 2005 Jun 7;111(22):2898-905
pubmed: 15927965
Heart. 2013 Jul;99(14):1018-23
pubmed: 23704324
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Feb;13(2):443-54
pubmed: 26385533
Heart. 2017 Sep;103(17):1315-1322
pubmed: 28687562