Global longitudinal strain assessment by computed tomography in severe aortic stenosis patients - Feasibility using feature tracking analysis.


Journal

Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
ISSN: 1876-861X
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101308347

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 02 07 2018
revised: 19 09 2018
accepted: 23 10 2018
pubmed: 7 11 2018
medline: 14 6 2019
entrez: 7 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Global longitudinal strain (GLS) detects subclinical myocardial changes in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Although GLS is typically measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), assessment by multiphasic gated computed tomography angiography (CTA) has become recently available. We sought to evaluate the feasibility of CTA-derived GLS assessment and compare its agreement with TTE using the same post-processing software in severe AS patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) evaluation. We evaluated patients with severe AS, sinus rhythm and adequate image quality for GLS analysis by both CTA and TTE pre-TAVR using 2D CT-Cardiac Performance Analysis prototype software (TomTec). The 18-segment model was used for GLS analysis by averaging the three long-axis views in both CTA and TTE studies. Agreement was assessed using linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis. A total of 123 consecutive patients were included (mean age 84 ± 7 years, 45% female). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by CTA and TTE were similar 53 ± 14% for both. On average, CTA-derived GLS was greater than by TTE (-20 ± 6.5% vs. -16 ± 4.9%, respectively, p < 0.001). There was a moderate correlation between GLS assessed by CTA vs. TTE (r = 0.62, p < 0.001), although variability between imaging methods existed. The correlation between GLS and LVEF was strong (r = -0.90, p < 0.001 for CTA, r = -0.88, p < 0.001 for TTE) using the same imaging modality. CTA-derived GLS assessment is feasible in selected patients with sinus rhythm and adequate image quality. The agreement of GLS between TTE and CTA is moderate but not interchangeable suggesting a potential modality-specific GLS threshold.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Global longitudinal strain (GLS) detects subclinical myocardial changes in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Although GLS is typically measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), assessment by multiphasic gated computed tomography angiography (CTA) has become recently available. We sought to evaluate the feasibility of CTA-derived GLS assessment and compare its agreement with TTE using the same post-processing software in severe AS patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) evaluation.
METHODS METHODS
We evaluated patients with severe AS, sinus rhythm and adequate image quality for GLS analysis by both CTA and TTE pre-TAVR using 2D CT-Cardiac Performance Analysis prototype software (TomTec). The 18-segment model was used for GLS analysis by averaging the three long-axis views in both CTA and TTE studies. Agreement was assessed using linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 123 consecutive patients were included (mean age 84 ± 7 years, 45% female). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by CTA and TTE were similar 53 ± 14% for both. On average, CTA-derived GLS was greater than by TTE (-20 ± 6.5% vs. -16 ± 4.9%, respectively, p < 0.001). There was a moderate correlation between GLS assessed by CTA vs. TTE (r = 0.62, p < 0.001), although variability between imaging methods existed. The correlation between GLS and LVEF was strong (r = -0.90, p < 0.001 for CTA, r = -0.88, p < 0.001 for TTE) using the same imaging modality.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
CTA-derived GLS assessment is feasible in selected patients with sinus rhythm and adequate image quality. The agreement of GLS between TTE and CTA is moderate but not interchangeable suggesting a potential modality-specific GLS threshold.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30396864
pii: S1934-5925(18)30254-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2018.10.020
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Evaluation Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

157-162

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Miho Fukui (M)

University of Pittsburgh, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Jeffrey Xu (J)

University of Pittsburgh, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Islam Abdelkarim (I)

University of Pittsburgh, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Michael S Sharbaugh (MS)

University of Pittsburgh, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Floyd W Thoma (FW)

University of Pittsburgh, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Andrew D Althouse (AD)

University of Pittsburgh, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Gianni Pedrizzetti (G)

Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

João L Cavalcante (JL)

University of Pittsburgh, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: joao.cavalcante@allina.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH