A randomized, double-blind, phase III trial of personalized peptide vaccination for recurrent glioblastoma.
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Antigens, Neoplasm
/ immunology
Brain Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Cancer Vaccines
/ therapeutic use
DNA-Binding Proteins
/ immunology
Female
Glioblastoma
/ drug therapy
HLA-A24 Antigen
/ metabolism
Humans
Karnofsky Performance Status
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Proteins
/ immunology
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ drug therapy
Precision Medicine
Prognosis
Proportional Hazards Models
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
Vaccines, Subunit
/ therapeutic use
Young Adult
biomarker for overall survival
personalized peptide vaccine
phase III trial
pre-existing immunity
recurrent glioblastoma
Journal
Neuro-oncology
ISSN: 1523-5866
Titre abrégé: Neuro Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100887420
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 02 2019
19 02 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
1
12
2018
medline:
6
5
2020
entrez:
1
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We conducted a phase III trial of personalized peptide vaccination (PPV) for human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A24+ recurrent glioblastoma to develop a new treatment modality. We randomly assigned 88 recurrent glioblastoma patients to receive PPV (n = 58) or the placebo (n = 30) at a 2-to-1 ratio. Four of 12 warehouse peptides selected based on preexisting peptide-specific immunoglobulin G levels or the corresponding placebos were injected 1×/week for 12 weeks. Our trial met neither the primary (overall survival [OS]) nor secondary endpoints. Unfavorable factors for OS of 58 PPV patients compared with 30 placebo patients were SART2-93 peptide selection (n = 13 vs 8, hazard ratio [HR]: 15.9), ≥70 years old (4 vs 4, 7.87), >70 kg body weight (10 vs 7, 4.11), and performance status (PS)3 (8 vs 2, 2.82), respectively. Consequently, the median OS for PPV patients without SART2-93 selection plus one of these 3 favorable factors (<70 y old, ≤70 kg, or PS0-2) was significantly longer than that for the corresponding placebo patients (HR: 0.49, 0.44, and 0.51), respectively. Preexisting immunity against both all 12 warehouse peptides besides SART2-93 and the other cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitope peptides was significantly depressed in the patients with SART2-93 selection (n = 21) compared with that of the patients without SART2-93 selection (n = 67). Biomarkers correlative for favorable OS of the PPV patients were a lower percentage of CD11b+CD14+HLA-DRlow immunosuppressive monocytes and a higher percentage of CD4+CD45RA- activated T cells, the intermediate levels of chemokine C-C ligand 2 (CCL2), vascular endothelial growth factor, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-17, or haptoglobin, respectively. This phase III trial met neither the primary nor secondary endpoints.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
We conducted a phase III trial of personalized peptide vaccination (PPV) for human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A24+ recurrent glioblastoma to develop a new treatment modality.
METHODS
We randomly assigned 88 recurrent glioblastoma patients to receive PPV (n = 58) or the placebo (n = 30) at a 2-to-1 ratio. Four of 12 warehouse peptides selected based on preexisting peptide-specific immunoglobulin G levels or the corresponding placebos were injected 1×/week for 12 weeks.
RESULTS
Our trial met neither the primary (overall survival [OS]) nor secondary endpoints. Unfavorable factors for OS of 58 PPV patients compared with 30 placebo patients were SART2-93 peptide selection (n = 13 vs 8, hazard ratio [HR]: 15.9), ≥70 years old (4 vs 4, 7.87), >70 kg body weight (10 vs 7, 4.11), and performance status (PS)3 (8 vs 2, 2.82), respectively. Consequently, the median OS for PPV patients without SART2-93 selection plus one of these 3 favorable factors (<70 y old, ≤70 kg, or PS0-2) was significantly longer than that for the corresponding placebo patients (HR: 0.49, 0.44, and 0.51), respectively. Preexisting immunity against both all 12 warehouse peptides besides SART2-93 and the other cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitope peptides was significantly depressed in the patients with SART2-93 selection (n = 21) compared with that of the patients without SART2-93 selection (n = 67). Biomarkers correlative for favorable OS of the PPV patients were a lower percentage of CD11b+CD14+HLA-DRlow immunosuppressive monocytes and a higher percentage of CD4+CD45RA- activated T cells, the intermediate levels of chemokine C-C ligand 2 (CCL2), vascular endothelial growth factor, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-17, or haptoglobin, respectively.
CONCLUSION
This phase III trial met neither the primary nor secondary endpoints.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30500939
pii: 5219198
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy200
pmc: PMC6380422
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antigens, Neoplasm
0
Cancer Vaccines
0
DNA-Binding Proteins
0
HLA-A24 Antigen
0
Neoplasm Proteins
0
Vaccines, Subunit
0
DSE protein, human
EC 5.1.3.19
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
348-359Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
J Neurooncol. 2013 Aug;114(1):79-84
pubmed: 23666204
Oncotarget. 2017 Oct 6;8(53):91779-91794
pubmed: 29207684
J Neurooncol. 2015 Jul;123(3):359-72
pubmed: 25724916
Cancer Treat Rev. 2013 Jun;39(4):350-7
pubmed: 22722053
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jun 15;22(12):2908-18
pubmed: 26787752
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Aug 15;11(16):5900-11
pubmed: 16115932
Neurochem Int. 2017 Feb;103:1-7
pubmed: 28025034
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007 May;6(5):404-14
pubmed: 17473845
J Immunol. 2011 Aug 1;187(3):1254-63
pubmed: 21705618
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 1;27(28):4733-40
pubmed: 19720927
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jan 1;22(1):54-60
pubmed: 26581246
Cancer Res. 2013 Nov 1;73(21):6413-23
pubmed: 24030977
Int J Oncol. 2004 Jul;25(1):121-31
pubmed: 15201997
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jan 20;29(3):337-44
pubmed: 21149665
Lifetime Data Anal. 2008 Dec;14(4):447-63
pubmed: 18836831
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Aug;15(9):943-53
pubmed: 25035291
Cancer Res. 2016 Oct 1;76(19):5671-5682
pubmed: 27530322
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 20;35(3):343-351
pubmed: 27918718