Interview Techniques Utilized in Radiology Resident Selection-A Survey of the APDR.


Journal

Academic radiology
ISSN: 1878-4046
Titre abrégé: Acad Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9440159

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2019
Historique:
received: 29 09 2018
revised: 27 10 2018
accepted: 05 11 2018
pubmed: 5 12 2018
medline: 7 5 2020
entrez: 5 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To evaluate interview techniques currently used in the selection of diagnostic radiology resident candidates and to identify factors influencing the use of alternative interview techniques. An anonymous 25 question e-mail survey was provided to 319 active members of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology. The survey included questions on residency demographics, organization of resident applicant interviews, types of interview techniques utilized, scoring and ranking of applicants, and facets of the interview/application felt most important to the selection process. Statistical analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the use of alternative interview techniques. 93.7% of responding programs use traditional interview techniques, with 92% using unblinded, unstructured interviews, 8% blinded, unstructured interviews. Structured interview questions were incorporated in 22%. Few programs used alternative techniques like the multiple mini-interview. None of the programs used written prompts during the interview, 3% used casual visual cognitive testing, 10% used panel interview techniques, and none used formal personality testing. For ranking candidates in the match, the most important facets considered were USMLE Step scores, performance on the interview, clinical course grades, and letters of reference. Factors associated with use of alternative techniques were domains associated with program size and number of faculty. The majority of radiology training programs still rely upon the traditional unblinded interview technique. There is an opportunity for training programs to examine alternative techniques that reduce bias and may provide better insight into other aspects of the candidate that may not be as readily highlighted with the traditional, unblinded interview.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30509544
pii: S1076-6332(18)30488-4
doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.11.002
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

989-998

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Claudia Kasales (C)

Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Radiology, 35 Hope Drive, Hershey, PA 17033. Electronic address: ckasales@pennstatehealth.psu.edu.

Christine Peterson (C)

Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Radiology, 35 Hope Drive, Hershey, PA 17033.

Eric Gagnon (E)

Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Radiology, 35 Hope Drive, Hershey, PA 17033.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH