Outcomes and prognostic factors in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: multi-institutional analysis of the Spanish RECAP database.
Androgen-deprivation therapy
Intermediate risk
Prostate cancer
Radiotherapy
Journal
Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico
ISSN: 1699-3055
Titre abrégé: Clin Transl Oncol
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101247119
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
03
10
2018
accepted:
24
11
2018
pubmed:
12
12
2018
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
12
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To retrospectively assess outcomes and to identify prognostic factors in patients diagnosed with intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa) treated with primary external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Data were obtained from the multi-institutional Spanish RECAP database, a population-based prostate cancer registry in Spain. All IR patients (NCCN criteria) who underwent primary EBRT were included. The following variables were assessed: age; prostate-specific antigen (PSA); Gleason score; clinical T stage; percentage of positive biopsy cores (PPBC); androgen deprivation therapy (ADT); and radiotherapy dose. The patients were stratified into one of three risk subcategories: (1) favourable IR (FIR; GS 6, ≤ T2b or GS 3 + 4, ≤ T1c), (2) marginal IR (MIR; GS 3 + 4, T2a-b), and (3) unfavourable IR (UIR; GS 4 + 3 or T2c). Biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. A total of 1754 patients from the RECAP database were included and stratified by risk group: FIR, n = 781 (44.5%); MIR, n = 252 (14.4%); and UIR, n = 721 (41.1%). Mean age was 71 years (range 47-86). Mean PSA was 10.4 ng/ml (range 6-20). The median radiotherapy dose was 74 Gy, with mean doses of 72.5 Gy (FIR), 73.4 Gy (MIR), and 72.8 Gy (UIR). Most patients (88%) received ADT for a median of 7.1 months. By risk group (FIR, MIR, UIR), ADT rates were, respectively, 88.9, 86.5, and 86.9%. Only patients with ≥ 24 months of follow-up post-EBRT were included in the survival analysis (n = 1294). At a median follow-up of 52 months (range 24-173), respective 5- and 10-year outcomes were: OS 93.6% and 79%; BRFS 88.9% and 71.4%; DFS 96.1% and 89%; CSS 98.9% and 94.6%. Complication rates (≥ grade 3) were: acute genitourinary (GU) 2%; late GU 1%; acute gastrointestinal (GI) 2%; late GI 1%. There was no significant association between risk group and BRFS or OS. However, patients with favourable-risk disease had significantly better 5- and 10-year DFS than patients with UIR: 98.7% vs. 92.4% and 92% vs. 85.8% (p = 0.0005). CSS was significantly higher (p = 0.0057) in the FIR group at 5 (99.7% vs. 97.3%) and 10 years (96.1% vs. 93.4%). On the multivariate analyses, the following were significant predictors of survival: ADT (BRFS and DFS); dose ≥ 74 Gy (BRFS); age (OS). This is the first nationwide study in Spain to report long-term outcomes of patients with intermediate-risk PCa treated with EBRT. Survival outcomes were good, with a low incidence of both acute and late toxicity. Patients with unfavourable risk characteristics had significantly lower 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates. ADT and radiotherapy dose ≥ 74 Gy were both significant predictors of treatment outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30536208
doi: 10.1007/s12094-018-02000-y
pii: 10.1007/s12094-018-02000-y
doi:
Substances chimiques
Androgen Antagonists
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
900-909Références
J Urol. 2003 Jan;169(1):157-63
pubmed: 12478126
Lancet Oncol. 2007 Jun;8(6):475-87
pubmed: 17482880
Can Urol Assoc J. 2009 Feb;3(1):13-21
pubmed: 19293970
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1106-11
pubmed: 20124169
Eur Urol. 2011 Dec;60(6):1133-9
pubmed: 21889832
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jun;13(6):e259-69
pubmed: 22652234
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Mar 1;85(3):693-9
pubmed: 22836052
Eur Urol. 2013 Dec;64(6):895-902
pubmed: 23541457
Cancer. 2014 Jun 15;120(12):1787-93
pubmed: 24604289
BJU Int. 2015 Jun;115(6):907-12
pubmed: 24612460
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014 May;12(5):686-718
pubmed: 24812137
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar;16(3):320-7
pubmed: 25702876
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Jun;1(3):334-40
pubmed: 26181182
Oncology (Williston Park). 2016 Mar;30(3):229-36
pubmed: 26984216
Radiat Oncol. 2016 Jun 08;11:78
pubmed: 27276878
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2016 May-Jun;21(3):181-7
pubmed: 27601948
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424
pubmed: 27626136
Prostate. 2017 Feb;77(2):154-163
pubmed: 27683213
Acta Oncol. 2017 Jan;56(1):21-26
pubmed: 27882806
BJU Int. 2017 Nov;120(5B):E87-E95
pubmed: 28464446
J Urol. 2018 Mar;199(3):683-690
pubmed: 29203269
JAMA. 1998 Sep 16;280(11):969-74
pubmed: 9749478