Enhanced recovery after surgery in colorectal surgery: Impact of protocol adherence on patient outcomes.
Aged
Anesthesiology
/ standards
Canada
Clinical Protocols
/ standards
Colon
/ surgery
Elective Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Female
Guideline Adherence
/ statistics & numerical data
Hospitals, Teaching
/ standards
Humans
Length of Stay
/ statistics & numerical data
Male
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
/ statistics & numerical data
Patient Readmission
/ statistics & numerical data
Perioperative Care
/ standards
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prospective Studies
Rectum
/ surgery
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
Adherence
Colorectal surgery
Complications
Enhanced recovery after surgery
Length of stay
Perioperative care
Journal
Journal of clinical anesthesia
ISSN: 1873-4529
Titre abrégé: J Clin Anesth
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8812166
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
14
08
2018
revised:
10
11
2018
accepted:
18
12
2018
pubmed:
26
12
2018
medline:
14
8
2019
entrez:
25
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is growing evidence internationally to support Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways. The impact of pathway compliance and the relative importance of individual components, however, remains less clear. Our institution implemented a multimodal ERAS protocol for elective colorectal surgery in November 2013. The objectives of this study were to investigate the impact of the introduction of the pathway, the relationship between pathway adherence and patient outcomes, and the relative importance of individual components. This was a single-center, observational cohort study of elective colorectal surgical patients. A tertiary care and academic teaching hospital in Canada. Prospective data was collected from 495 consecutive major colorectal surgical patients following the ERAS launch. Retrospective data was also collected from a pre-ERAS cohort of 99. Adherence to 12 ERAS components were measured, along with American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP®) defined patient complications and hospital length of stay (LOS). Post-ERAS patients were divided in to two groups: high compliance (≥75% process adherence) and low compliance (<75% adherence). Outcomes were compared between groups. There was a significant reduction in both complication rate (31.5% vs 14.6%; p ≤0.05) and hospital mean LOS (10.1 vs 6.9 days; p ≤0.05) following introduction of the ERAS pathway. The high adherence group had a shorter mean LOS (5.7 vs 8.6 days; p ≤0.01) and lower rate of complications (11.2% vs 19.6%; p = 0.02) compared with the low compliance group. Higher adherence to the standardized ERAS protocol was associated with improved patient outcomes, including reduced pulmonary complications. The cause-effect relationship is complex and likely influenced by confounding factors. Our data provides feedback to aid ongoing innovation of our pathway locally and adds to the growing body of evidence supporting the value of ERAS in general.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30583114
pii: S0952-8180(18)31057-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.12.034
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Pagination
7-12Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.