Biological or mechanical prostheses for isolated aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50-65 years: the ANDALVALVE study.


Journal

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery
ISSN: 1873-734X
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8804069

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Jun 2019
Historique:
received: 11 09 2018
revised: 07 11 2018
accepted: 22 11 2018
pubmed: 5 1 2019
medline: 2 10 2020
entrez: 5 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The decision about whether to use a biological or a mechanical prosthesis for aortic valve replacement remains controversial in patients between 50 and 65 years of age and has yet to be addressed in a Mediterranean population. This research aimed to analyse long-term survival and major morbidity rates (30-day mortality, stroke, any prosthetic reoperation and major bleeding) within this population. Our multicentre observational retrospective study included all subjects aged 50-65 years who had a primary isolated aortic valve replacement due to severe aortic stenosis at 7 public hospitals from Andalusia (Spain) between 2000 and 2015. Concomitant surgery, reoperations and endocarditis were the exclusion criteria. A total of 1443 patients were enrolled in the study (272 with biological and 1171 with mechanical valves). Multivariate analyses including a 2:1 propensity score matching (506 mechanical and 257 biological prostheses) were conducted. Bioprostheses were implanted in 18.8% (n = 272): 35% were women; the mean EuroSCORE-I was 3%. The mean follow-up was 8.1 ± 4.9 years in a matched sample: 8.8 ± 4.9 years in those receiving a mechanical vs 7.1 ± 4.5 years in those receiving a biological prosthesis (P = 0.001). In the paired sample, the 15-year survival rate was 73% in those who had a biological vs 76% in those who had a mechanical valve [hazard ratio (HR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-1.20; P = 0.159]. No significant differences were observed in patients ≥55 years old (74% of 15-year survival in both groups: HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.56-1.34; P = 0.527). A higher rate of major bleeding was found in patients with a mechanical prosthesis (P = 0.004), whereas reoperation was more frequent among those with a biological prosthesis (P = 0.01). Long-term survival was comparable in patients above 55 years of age. Mechanical prostheses were associated with more major bleeding and bioprostheses, with more reoperations. A bioprosthesis in patients above 55 years old is a reasonable choice. NCT03239509.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30608571
pii: 5272476
doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy459
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03239509']

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1160-1167

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Emiliano A Rodríguez-Caulo (EA)

Cardiovascular Surgery Service, University Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga CIBERCV Cardiovascular Diseases, Health Institute Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

Diego Macías (D)

Cardiovascular Surgery Service, University Hospital Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain.

Alejandro Adsuar (A)

Cardiovascular Surgery Service, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.

Andrea Ferreiro (A)

Cardiovascular Surgery Service, University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain.

Javier Arias-Dachary (J)

Cardiovascular Surgery Service, University Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain.

Gertrudis Parody (G)

Cardiovascular Surgery Service, University Hospital Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain.

Frank Fernández (F)

Cardiovascular Surgery Service, Regional University Hospital, Málaga, Spain.

Tomás Daroca (T)

Cardiovascular Surgery Service, University Hospital Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain.

Felipe Rodríguez-Mora (F)

Cardiovascular Surgery Service, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.

José M Garrido (JM)

Cardiovascular Surgery Service, University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain.

Ignacio Muñoz-Carvajal (I)

Cardiovascular Surgery Service, University Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain.

José M Barquero (JM)

Cardiovascular Surgery Service, University Hospital Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain.

José F Valderrama (JF)

Cardiovascular Surgery Service, Regional University Hospital, Málaga, Spain.

José M Melero (JM)

Cardiovascular Surgery Service, University Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga CIBERCV Cardiovascular Diseases, Health Institute Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH