A much valued tool that also brings ethical dilemmas - a qualitative study of Norwegian midwives' experiences and views on the role of obstetric ultrasound.


Journal

BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Jan 2019
Historique:
received: 18 03 2018
accepted: 04 01 2019
entrez: 18 1 2019
pubmed: 18 1 2019
medline: 9 5 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Midwives are the main providers of routine antenatal care services including the routine ultrasound examination in Norway. The ultrasound examination can be perceived by expectant parents not only as a medical examination but also as a social event facilitating attachment to their fetus. This study explores Norwegian midwives' experiences and views on the role of ultrasound in clinical management of pregnancy. A qualitative study design was applied. Twenty-four midwives who all performed obstetric ultrasound examinations were recruited for focus group discussions and individual interviews. Data collection took place in 2015 in five hospitals in two different regions of Norway. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Midwives described obstetric ultrasound examinations as very valuable although doing ultrasounds placed high demands on their operational and counselling skills. Increasing requests for ultrasound from pregnant women were mentioned. Advancements in ultrasound diagnosis were considered to have put the fetus in the position of a patient, and that pregnant women declining ultrasound could be viewed as irresponsible by some health professionals. Ethical concerns were raised regarding the possibility of pregnancy termination when fetal anomalies were detected. Fears were also expressed that prenatal diagnoses including those following ultrasound, might create a society where only 'perfect' children are valued. However, participants stressed that their intention in performing ultrasound was to optimize pregnancy outcome and thereby assist expectant couples and their unborn children. Midwives in Norwegian maternity care services describe obstetric ultrasound as very valuable, playing a central role in pregnancy management by optimizing pregnancy outcomes. Although high demands are placed on operators' technical skills and counseling, midwives described performing obstetric ultrasound as very satisfying work. However, midwives believed that expectant parents' approach to the ultrasound examination, both its medical value and the precious images obtained of the fetus, could put extra strain on the midwives performing ultrasounds. The potential of ultrasound to detect fetal anomalies and the possibility that this may lead to termination of pregnancy, seemed to create some ambivalent feelings in midwives towards its use.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Midwives are the main providers of routine antenatal care services including the routine ultrasound examination in Norway. The ultrasound examination can be perceived by expectant parents not only as a medical examination but also as a social event facilitating attachment to their fetus. This study explores Norwegian midwives' experiences and views on the role of ultrasound in clinical management of pregnancy.
METHODS METHODS
A qualitative study design was applied. Twenty-four midwives who all performed obstetric ultrasound examinations were recruited for focus group discussions and individual interviews. Data collection took place in 2015 in five hospitals in two different regions of Norway. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
RESULTS RESULTS
Midwives described obstetric ultrasound examinations as very valuable although doing ultrasounds placed high demands on their operational and counselling skills. Increasing requests for ultrasound from pregnant women were mentioned. Advancements in ultrasound diagnosis were considered to have put the fetus in the position of a patient, and that pregnant women declining ultrasound could be viewed as irresponsible by some health professionals. Ethical concerns were raised regarding the possibility of pregnancy termination when fetal anomalies were detected. Fears were also expressed that prenatal diagnoses including those following ultrasound, might create a society where only 'perfect' children are valued. However, participants stressed that their intention in performing ultrasound was to optimize pregnancy outcome and thereby assist expectant couples and their unborn children.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Midwives in Norwegian maternity care services describe obstetric ultrasound as very valuable, playing a central role in pregnancy management by optimizing pregnancy outcomes. Although high demands are placed on operators' technical skills and counseling, midwives described performing obstetric ultrasound as very satisfying work. However, midwives believed that expectant parents' approach to the ultrasound examination, both its medical value and the precious images obtained of the fetus, could put extra strain on the midwives performing ultrasounds. The potential of ultrasound to detect fetal anomalies and the possibility that this may lead to termination of pregnancy, seemed to create some ambivalent feelings in midwives towards its use.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30651083
doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2178-x
pii: 10.1186/s12884-019-2178-x
pmc: PMC6335783
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

33

Subventions

Organisme : Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
ID : 2013-2699
Organisme : Vetenskapsrådet
ID : 2014-2672

Références

Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999 Jan;25(1):3-56
pubmed: 10048801
Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(16):i-vi, 1-193
pubmed: 11070816
Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12
pubmed: 14769454
Midwifery. 2010 Feb;26(1):18-26
pubmed: 18571818
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2008 Dec 18;128(24):2855-9
pubmed: 19092965
Prenat Diagn. 2009 Oct;29(10):952-9
pubmed: 19582763
Nurs Ethics. 2009 Sep;16(5):637-46
pubmed: 19671649
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Oct;81(1):87-93
pubmed: 20083367
BJOG. 2010 Aug;117(9):1127-38
pubmed: 20528866
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;36(5):525-9
pubmed: 20981718
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec;36(6):779-80
pubmed: 21105179
Midwifery. 2012 Oct;28(5):e667-75
pubmed: 21920645
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2012 Aug 7;132(14):1603-7
pubmed: 22875123
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57687
pubmed: 23469051
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Jul;92(7):804-8
pubmed: 23521227
Semin Perinatol. 2013 Oct;37(5):323-6
pubmed: 24176154
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Apr;28(3):443-51
pubmed: 24374013
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Jan;94(1):102-5
pubmed: 25252095
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Oct 22;14:363
pubmed: 25336335
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 May 08;16:31
pubmed: 25953252
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Aug 15;15:171
pubmed: 26276642
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Aug 27;15:195
pubmed: 26311437
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2016 Mar;7:8-13
pubmed: 26826039
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Apr;154:100-9
pubmed: 26954999
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Aug;95(8):845-9
pubmed: 27124273
Midwifery. 2016 Nov;42:46-53
pubmed: 27788415
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Aug;43:58-67
pubmed: 28268059
Sociol Health Illn. 2017 Jul;39(6):893-907
pubmed: 28326555
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018 Mar;15:69-76
pubmed: 29389504
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018 Jun;16:1-5
pubmed: 29804752

Auteurs

Annika Åhman (A)

Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.

Kristina Edvardsson (K)

Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden. k.edvardsson@latrobe.edu.au.
Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. k.edvardsson@latrobe.edu.au.

Tove Anita Fagerli (TA)

National Center for Fetal Medicine, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

Elisabeth Darj (E)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Sophia Holmlund (S)

Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.

Rhonda Small (R)

Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Reproductive Health, Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Ingrid Mogren (I)

Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH