Comparison of 18-Month Outcomes of Ambulatory Patients With Reduced (≤40%) Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Treated in a Community-Based, Dedicated Heart Failure Clinic Versus Treated Elsewhere.
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
/ therapeutic use
Aged
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
/ therapeutic use
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Electric Countershock
/ methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Guideline Adherence
Heart Failure
/ mortality
Humans
Israel
/ epidemiology
Male
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists
/ therapeutic use
Retrospective Studies
Stroke Volume
/ physiology
Survival Rate
/ trends
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Function, Left
/ physiology
Journal
The American journal of cardiology
ISSN: 1879-1913
Titre abrégé: Am J Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0207277
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 04 2019
01 04 2019
Historique:
received:
12
11
2018
revised:
14
12
2018
accepted:
19
12
2018
pubmed:
20
1
2019
medline:
10
1
2020
entrez:
20
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We sought to examine the management and outcomes of ambulatory patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction in a community-based, dedicated clinic. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% were actively solicited to attend a community-based, dedicated clinic. Eligible patients who chose to decline constituted our control group. Of 552 patients with LVEF ≤40% (median age 73 years and median LVEF 35%), 304 (55%) agreed to attend the clinic. Patients with worse New York Heart Association class were more likely to attend the clinic (odds ratio 2.07 [1.45, 2.95], p <0.001), whereas women were more likely to decline (odds ratio 0.63 [0.42, 0.93], p <0.022). During 18 months of follow-up, patients in the dedicated clinic significantly improved their functional capacity (56% New York Heart Association 3 to 4 at baseline vs 27% at follow-up, p <0.001) and LVEF (35% [interquartile range 25, 35] at baseline vs 35% (interquartile range 30, 40) at follow-up, p <0.001). In comparison with patients managed routinely, patients treated in a dedicated clinic achieved better guideline-recommended pharmacological treatment (65% vs 85% receiving β blockers, p <0.001, 65% vs 82% receiving renin-angiotensin inhibitors, p = 0.0006, 31% vs 45% receiving mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, p <0.001). During follow-up, electrical device implantation was similar (6% vs 7% of dedicated-HF-clinic patients, p = 0.700). Furthermore, overall survival was better in patients treated in the clinic (log rank p = 0.0006), even after censoring the first 4 months to account for potential bias (log rank p = 0.0232). In conclusion, management in a community-based, dedicated clinic compared with routine management was associated with augmented guideline-recommended treatment and improved survival.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30658921
pii: S0002-9149(19)30036-0
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.12.033
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
0
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
0
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
0
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1101-1108Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.