GWAS analysis of sorghum association panel lines identifies SNPs associated with disease response to Texas isolates of Colletotrichum sublineola.
Journal
TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik
ISSN: 1432-2242
Titre abrégé: Theor Appl Genet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0145600
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
13
05
2018
accepted:
16
01
2019
pubmed:
29
1
2019
medline:
20
8
2019
entrez:
29
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
SNPs identify prospective genes related to response to Colletotrichum sublineola (anthracnose) in the sorghum association panel lines. Sorghum association panel (SAP) lines were scored over several years for response to Colletotrichum sublineola, the causal agent of the disease anthracnose. Known resistant and susceptible lines were included each year to verify successful inoculation. Over 79,000 single-nucleotide polymorphic (SNP) loci from a publicly available genotype by sequencing dataset available for the SAP lines were used with TASSEL association mapping software to identify chromosomal locations associated with differences in disease response. When the top-scoring SNPs were mapped to the published sorghum genome, in each case, the nearest annotated gene has precedence for a role in host defense.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30688991
doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03285-5
pii: 10.1007/s00122-019-03285-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1389-1396Subventions
Organisme : USDA CRIS project
ID : # 3091-22000-034-00-D
Références
Plant Physiol. 1994 Jan;104(1):209-215
pubmed: 12232073
Trends Plant Sci. 2004 Apr;9(4):203-9
pubmed: 15063871
Immunol Rev. 2004 Apr;198:249-66
pubmed: 15199967
Mycopathologia. 2005 Apr;159(3):449-59
pubmed: 15883732
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(16):5520-4
pubmed: 16593867
Funct Integr Genomics. 2007 Jul;7(3):181-91
pubmed: 17149585
Bioinformatics. 2007 Oct 1;23(19):2633-5
pubmed: 17586829
Int J Plant Genomics. 2008;2008:362451
pubmed: 18483564
Phytopathology. 1998 Oct;88(10):1087-93
pubmed: 18944821
BMC Plant Biol. 2009 Jan 26;9:13
pubmed: 19171067
Science. 2009 Mar 6;323(5919):1360-3
pubmed: 19229000
Trends Plant Sci. 2009 Jun;14(6):310-7
pubmed: 19443266
BMC Genomics. 2010 Feb 01;11:78
pubmed: 20122142
PLoS Pathog. 2010 Jul 01;6:e1000982
pubmed: 20617181
Plant Physiol. 2011 Jan;155(1):447-63
pubmed: 21205632
PLoS One. 2011 May 04;6(5):e19379
pubmed: 21573248
Plant Physiol. 2011 Aug;156(4):2053-68
pubmed: 21653783
J Pathog. 2011;2011:278697
pubmed: 22567326
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 8;110(2):453-8
pubmed: 23267105
Theor Appl Genet. 2013 Jun;126(6):1649-57
pubmed: 23463493
G3 (Bethesda). 2013 Nov 06;3(11):2085-94
pubmed: 24048646
J Agric Food Chem. 2014 Nov 12;62(45):10916-27
pubmed: 25272193
G3 (Bethesda). 2015 Mar 31;5(6):1117-28
pubmed: 25834216
G3 (Bethesda). 2015 Apr 16;5(6):1165-75
pubmed: 25882062
Int J Mol Sci. 2015 Aug 14;16(8):19248-90
pubmed: 26287177
PLoS Genet. 2016 Sep 12;12(9):e1006311
pubmed: 27618555
BMC Genomics. 2017 Jan 10;18(1):67
pubmed: 28073340
BMC Plant Biol. 2017 Jan 13;17(1):12
pubmed: 28086798
Theor Appl Genet. 2017 May;130(5):999-1010
pubmed: 28275816
Plant Biotechnol J. 2017 Dec;15(12):1520-1532
pubmed: 28371164
Open Biol. 2017 May;7(5):
pubmed: 28469008
Plant J. 2018 Jan;93(2):338-354
pubmed: 29161754
Theor Appl Genet. 2018 Jul;131(7):1405-1422
pubmed: 29589041
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Mar 28;9:405
pubmed: 29643863
Plant Genome. 2018 Jul;11(2):
pubmed: 30025025
Plant Dis. 2008 Oct;92(10):1415-1420
pubmed: 30769577