Metabolic and proteomic alteration in phytohormone-producing endophytic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens RWL-1 during methanol utilization.


Journal

Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society
ISSN: 1573-3890
Titre abrégé: Metabolomics
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101274889

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 01 2019
Historique:
received: 21 08 2018
accepted: 20 12 2018
entrez: 5 3 2019
pubmed: 5 3 2019
medline: 24 3 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Methanol utilization by bacteria is important for various industrial processes. Methylotrophic bacteria are taxonomically diverse and some species promote plant growth and induce stress tolerance. However, methylotrophic potential of bacterial endophytes is poorly understood. The current study aimed to evaluate the metabolomic and proteomic changes in endophytic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens RWL-1 caused by its methanol utilization and the resultant influence on its phytohormone production. B. amyloliquefaciens RWL-1 was grown in LB medium with different concentrations [0 (control), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, and 4%) of methanol to examine its methylotrophic potential. SDS-PAGE analysis was carried out for bacterial protein confirmation. Moreover, the phytohormones (indole 3 acetic acid (IAA), gibberellins (GAs), abscisic acid (ABA)) produced by RWL-1 in methanol supplemented medium were quantified by GC-MS/SIM (6890N Network GC system, and 5973 Network Mass Selective Detector; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), while the antioxidants were estimated spectrophotometrically (T60 UV-VIS spectrophotometer, Leicester, UK). The amino acid quantification was carried out by amino acid analyzer (HITACHI L-8900, Japan). Furthermore, Nano-liquid chromatography (LC)-MS/MS analysis was performed with an Agilent system (Wilmington, DE, USA) for proteomic analysis while mascot algorithm (Matrix science, USA) was used to identify peptide sequences present in the protein sequence database. RWL-1 showed significant growth in media supplemented with 2 and 3.5% methanol, when compared with other concentrations. Mass spectroscopy analysis revealed that RWL-1 utilizes methanol efficiently as a carbon source. In the presence of methanol, RWL-1 produced significantly higher levels of IAA but lower levels of ABA, when compared with the control. Further, enzymatic antioxidants and functional amino acids were significantly up-regulated, with predominant expression of glutamic acid and alanine. Nano-liquid chromatography, quadrupole time-of-flight analysis, and quantitative analysis of methanol-treated bacterial cells showed expression of eight different types of proteins, including detoxification proteins, unrecognized and unclassified enzymes with antioxidant properties, proteases, metabolism enzymes, ribosomal proteins, antioxidant proteins, chaperones, and heat shock proteins. Results demonstrate that RWL-1 can significantly enhance its growth by utilizing methanol, and could produce phytohormones when growing in methanol-supplemented media, with increased expression of specific proteins and different biochemicals. These results will be useful in devising strategies for utilizing methylotrophic bacterial endophytes as alternative promoters of plant growth. Understanding RWL-1 ability to utilize methanol. The survival and phytohormones production by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens RWL-1 in methanol supplemented media whistle inducing metabolic and proteomic changes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30830445
doi: 10.1007/s11306-018-1467-0
pii: 10.1007/s11306-018-1467-0
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antioxidants 0
Indoleacetic Acids 0
Plant Growth Regulators 0
indoleacetic acid 6U1S09C61L
Abscisic Acid 72S9A8J5GW
Methanol Y4S76JWI15

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

16

Références

Exp Parasitol. 2015 Apr-May;151-152:56-63
pubmed: 25655405
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33800
pubmed: 22479445
Int Microbiol. 2000 Mar;3(1):3-8
pubmed: 10963327
PeerJ. 2017 Mar 16;5:e3107
pubmed: 28321368
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Jul;32(7):120
pubmed: 27263015
J Biol Chem. 2008 May 2;283(18):12188-201
pubmed: 18308719
Chemosphere. 2009 Sep;77(2):153-60
pubmed: 19647283
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2012 May;101(4):777-86
pubmed: 22200783
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016 Sep;106:236-43
pubmed: 27182958
Microbiology. 2002 Jul;148(Pt 7):2097-2109
pubmed: 12101298
Proteomics. 2004 May;4(5):1465-90
pubmed: 15188415
J Bacteriol. 2011 Nov;193(21):6032-8
pubmed: 21873495
Mikrobiologiia. 2001 Jul-Aug;70(4):452-8
pubmed: 11558269
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Nov 07;7:1626
pubmed: 27872630
Int Microbiol. 2009 Sep;12(3):187-92
pubmed: 19784925
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999 May 1;174(1):179-84
pubmed: 10234837
J Appl Microbiol. 2008 Jun;104(6):1667-74
pubmed: 18194256
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Aug 17;6:631
pubmed: 26347755
PLoS One. 2010 Oct 01;5(10):
pubmed: 20957036
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Aug;78(15):5170-81
pubmed: 22610424
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2014 Jun;27:30-7
pubmed: 24863894
Proteomics. 2014 Mar;14(6):725-37
pubmed: 24452867
Trends Biotechnol. 2009 Feb;27(2):107-15
pubmed: 19111927
Physiol Plant. 2004 Jun;121(2):305-312
pubmed: 15153198
J Plant Res. 2012 Mar;125(2):263-74
pubmed: 21584787
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Feb 27;280(1757):20130007
pubmed: 23446530
Environ Toxicol. 2016 Jul;31(7):887-96
pubmed: 25533023
Plant Signal Behav. 2011 Apr;6(4):510-5
pubmed: 21673511
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2004 May 1;48(2):249-59
pubmed: 19712408
J Proteome Res. 2007 Feb;6(2):759-71
pubmed: 17269732
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009 May;48(5):618-22
pubmed: 19416463
Bioresour Technol. 2010 Nov;101(22):8599-605
pubmed: 20637605
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2015 Jun;33:165-75
pubmed: 25796071
J Exp Bot. 2007;58(7):1783-93
pubmed: 17374874
Microbes Environ. 2008;23(2):109-17
pubmed: 21558696
Microbiology. 2009 Apr;155(Pt 4):1192-1202
pubmed: 19332821
J Biotechnol. 2014 Oct 20;188:110-1
pubmed: 25152427
Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2007;39(6):1190-203
pubmed: 17449317
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004 Jul;54(Pt 4):1191-6
pubmed: 15280290
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2000 Feb;11(1):25-30
pubmed: 10679350
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2000 Mar;45(3):198-207
pubmed: 10702338
Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2015 Mar;35(1):62-74
pubmed: 23984800
Plant Physiol. 1995 Aug;108(4):1359-1368
pubmed: 12228547
J Exp Bot. 2006;57(15):4025-32
pubmed: 17043084
J Exp Bot. 2002 Jan;53(366):1-11
pubmed: 11741035
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2002 Apr;1(4):323-33
pubmed: 12096114
Nat Biotechnol. 1999 Oct;17(10):994-9
pubmed: 10504701
Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2012 Jun;44(6):955-62
pubmed: 22433988
J Biosci Bioeng. 2017 Feb;123(2):190-196
pubmed: 27720675
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Jan;79(2):576-87
pubmed: 23144141
Curr Microbiol. 2006 Oct;53(4):270-6
pubmed: 16941245
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006 Jun;70(2):344-61
pubmed: 16760307
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010 Oct;60(Pt 10):2490-5
pubmed: 19966000
Science. 1998 Jul 3;281(5373):99-102
pubmed: 9651254
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Nov;77(21):7551-9
pubmed: 21908636
Mol Genet Genomics. 2005 May;273(3):225-39
pubmed: 15902489
Mol Cell. 1998 May;1(6):795-805
pubmed: 9660963
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 29;103(35):13186-91
pubmed: 16926146
BMC Genomics. 2015 Feb 14;16:73
pubmed: 25758049
Arch Microbiol. 1999 Dec;172(6):341-8
pubmed: 10591843
Microorganisms. 2015 Mar 20;3(1):94-112
pubmed: 27682081
Int J Med Microbiol. 2003 Dec;293(6):391-401
pubmed: 14760970
Proteomics. 2002 Aug;2(8):1047-60
pubmed: 12203900
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:909016
pubmed: 25861650
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997 Aug;63(8):3218-24
pubmed: 9251208
J Bacteriol. 2003 May;185(10):2980-7
pubmed: 12730156
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Nov;71(11):7245-52
pubmed: 16269765
PLoS One. 2008 Jul 16;3(7):e2702
pubmed: 18628963
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2015 Jun;107(6):1519-32
pubmed: 25860542
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2015 Jul 5;146:292-6
pubmed: 25819318
J Bacteriol. 1994 Sep;176(17):5210-7
pubmed: 8071195
J Bacteriol. 2002 Apr;184(7):1832-42
pubmed: 11889088
Genome Announc. 2014 Oct 30;2(5):
pubmed: 25359911
Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Sep;25(9):1007-14
pubmed: 17704766

Auteurs

Raheem Shahzad (R)

School of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 41566, Republic of Korea.

Abdul Latif Khan (AL)

Natural and Medical Science Research Center, University of Nizwa, Nizwa, Oman.

Muhammad Waqas (M)

Department of Agriculture Extension, Buner, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

Ihsan Ullah (I)

Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Saqib Bilal (S)

School of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 41566, Republic of Korea.

Yoon-Ha Kim (YH)

School of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 41566, Republic of Korea.

Sajjad Asaf (S)

Natural and Medical Science Research Center, University of Nizwa, Nizwa, Oman.

Sang-Mo Kang (SM)

Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 41566, Republic of Korea.

In-Jung Lee (IJ)

School of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 41566, Republic of Korea. ijlee@knu.ac.kr.

Articles similaires

Fragaria Light Plant Leaves Osmosis Stress, Physiological
Humans Arthritis, Rheumatoid Lipid Metabolism Male Female
Rhizosphere Glycine max Seeds Soybean Oil Soil Microbiology

Classifications MeSH