Metabolic and physiological changes induced by plant growth regulators and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and their impact on drought tolerance in Cicer arietinum L.
Bacillus
/ physiology
Cicer
/ drug effects
Droughts
Genotype
Greenhouse Effect
Metabolic Networks and Pathways
/ drug effects
Phenols
/ analysis
Plant Growth Regulators
/ pharmacology
Plant Leaves
/ chemistry
Putrescine
/ pharmacology
Salicylic Acid
/ pharmacology
Stress, Physiological
Water
/ analysis
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
25
12
2018
accepted:
13
02
2019
entrez:
5
3
2019
pubmed:
5
3
2019
medline:
4
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Plant growth regulators (PGRs) and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) play an important role in mitigating abiotic stresses. However, little is known about the parallel changes in physiological processes coupled with metabolic changes induced by PGRs and PGPRs that help to cope with drought stress in chickpeas. The present investigation was carried out to study the integrative effects of PGRs and PGPRs on the physiological and metabolic changes, and their association with drought tolerance in two chickpea genotypes. Inoculated seeds of two chickpea genotypes, Punjab Noor-2009 (drought sensitive) and 93127 (drought tolerance), were planted in greenhouse condition at the University of Florida. Prior to sowing, seeds of two chickpea varieties were soaked for 3 h in 24 h old cultures of PGPRs (Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus thuringiensis, and Bacillus megaterium), whereas, some of the seeds were soaked in distilled water for the same period of time and were treated as control. Plant growth regulators, salicylic acid (SA) and putrescine (Put), were applied on 25 days old seedlings just prior to the induction of drought stress. Drought stress was imposed by withholding the supply of water on 25-day-old seedlings (at the three-leaf stage) and continued for the next 25 days until the soil water content reached 14%. Ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (UPLC-HRMS) analysis concomitant with physiological parameters were carried out in chickpea leaves at two-time points i.e. 14 and 25 d after imposition of drought stress. The results showed that both genotypes, treated with PGRs and PGPRs (consortium), performed significantly better under drought condition through enhanced leaf relative water content (RWC), greater biomass of shoot and root, higher Fv/FM ratio and higher accumulation of protein, sugar and phenolic compounds. The sensitive genotype was more responsive than tolerant one. The results revealed that the accumulation of succinate, leucine, disaccharide, saccharic acid and glyceric acid was consistently higher in both genotypes at both time points due to PGRs and PGPRs treatment. Significant accumulation of malonate, 5-oxo-L-proline, and trans-cinnamate occurred at both time points only in the tolerant genotype following the consortium treatment. Aminoacyl-tRNA, primary and secondary metabolite biosynthesis, amino acid metabolism or synthesis pathways, and energy cycle were significantly altered due to PGRs and PGPRs treatment. It is inferred that changes in different physiological and metabolic parameters induced by PGRs and PGPRs treatment could confer drought tolerance in chickpeas.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30830939
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213040
pii: PONE-D-18-36802
pmc: PMC6398973
doi:
Substances chimiques
Phenols
0
Plant Growth Regulators
0
Water
059QF0KO0R
Salicylic Acid
O414PZ4LPZ
Putrescine
V10TVZ52E4
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0213040Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005 Jun;4(6):477-88
pubmed: 15931257
Mol Plant. 2012 Mar;5(2):401-17
pubmed: 22180467
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Sep;71(9):4951-9
pubmed: 16151072
Chem Biol Interact. 2006 Oct 27;163(1-2):113-32
pubmed: 16814759
Microbiol Res. 2018 Jan;206:131-140
pubmed: 29146250
Plant Cell Environ. 2009 Mar;32(3):220-36
pubmed: 19054353
J Exp Bot. 2012 May;63(9):3485-98
pubmed: 22553286
Trends Plant Sci. 2003 Aug;8(8):355-7
pubmed: 12927963
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Jul 27;7:1124
pubmed: 27512404
Protoplasma. 2018 Jan;255(1):399-412
pubmed: 28776104
J Plant Physiol. 2008 Oct 9;165(15):1620-35
pubmed: 18242770
Plant Cell Environ. 2010 Apr;33(4):453-67
pubmed: 19712065
J Plant Physiol. 2006 May;163(7):723-30
pubmed: 16616583
Plant Physiol. 2013 Jun;162(2):1042-59
pubmed: 23656894
Plant Cell Environ. 2006 Dec;29(12):2143-52
pubmed: 17081248
Plant Cell Environ. 2008 Jan;31(1):11-38
pubmed: 17971069
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Jun;7(3):254-61
pubmed: 15134745
BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Jan 09;14:13
pubmed: 24405887
Plant Mol Biol. 2013 Sep;83(1-2):89-103
pubmed: 23443681
Front Microbiol. 2015 Mar 17;6:198
pubmed: 25852661
Plant Sci. 2013 May;205-206:38-47
pubmed: 23498861
Microbiol Res. 2012 Sep 6;167(8):493-9
pubmed: 22677517
Plant Mol Biol. 2009 Mar;69(4):473-88
pubmed: 19083153
Cell Biochem Biophys. 2014 Apr;68(3):475-8
pubmed: 24068518
Plant Physiol. 2009 Jul;150(3):1335-44
pubmed: 19439570
Plant Signal Behav. 2008 Apr;3(4):263-5
pubmed: 19704649
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:781-803
pubmed: 16669782
Genome Biol Evol. 2014 Oct 01;6(10):2830-48
pubmed: 25274566
Plant J. 2009 Sep;59(5):777-88
pubmed: 19453458
Science. 2010 Aug 20;329(5994):940-3
pubmed: 20724633
Plant Cell. 1995 Jul;7(7):907-919
pubmed: 12242393
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2005;43:205-27
pubmed: 16078883
Amino Acids. 2007 Aug;33(2):231-40
pubmed: 17396215
Dev Dyn. 2008 Nov;237(11):3142-56
pubmed: 18816442
Science. 2006 Jan 6;311(5757):91-4
pubmed: 16400150
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 May;24(5):633-8
pubmed: 10849587
J Plant Res. 2007 May;120(3):345-50
pubmed: 17351711
J Plant Physiol. 2003 May;160(5):485-92
pubmed: 12806776
Front Plant Sci. 2011 Sep 12;2:44
pubmed: 22639595
Physiol Plant. 2008 Feb;132(2):199-208
pubmed: 18251861
Microbiol Res. 2005;160(1):83-94
pubmed: 15782942
Trends Biotechnol. 2011 Jun;29(6):267-75
pubmed: 21435731
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38554
pubmed: 22685583
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019 Jan;26(1):66-73
pubmed: 30622408
Nat Protoc. 2006;1(1):387-96
pubmed: 17406261
Plant Sci. 2015 Aug;237:16-23
pubmed: 26089148
J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007 Apr;17(4):547-59
pubmed: 18051264
Przegl Lek. 2013;70(2):85-91
pubmed: 23879010
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2001 Oct;4(5):387-91
pubmed: 11597495
Plant Cell Environ. 2019 Jan;42(1):115-132
pubmed: 29532945
PLoS One. 2013 May 22;8(5):e63637
pubmed: 23717458
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2012;63:73-105
pubmed: 22554242