The Causes and Outcomes of Early Relaparotomy Following Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplantation.
Child
Child, Preschool
End Stage Liver Disease
/ diagnosis
Female
Graft Survival
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Liver Transplantation
/ adverse effects
Living Donors
Male
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Prognosis
Reoperation
/ statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Severity of Illness Index
Survival Rate
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Journal
Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society
ISSN: 1527-6473
Titre abrégé: Liver Transpl
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100909185
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
received:
24
07
2018
accepted:
07
03
2019
pubmed:
14
3
2019
medline:
22
8
2020
entrez:
14
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Early relaparotomy of adult recipients after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is significantly associated with poor prognosis. However, there are few reports focusing on pediatric recipients after LDLT. The aim of this study is to clarify the causes and outcomes of early relaparotomy after pediatric LDLT. A total of 265 pediatric recipients (272 LDLTs) transplanted from May 2001 to October 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Early relaparotomy was defined as surgical intervention performed within 3 months after LDLT. Early relaparotomy was performed 49 times for 33 recipients (12.5%). The recipient and graft survival rates in the early relaparotomy group were significantly lower than those in the nonearly relaparotomy group, respectively (75.0% and 63.6% versus 96.6% and 95.8%; both P < 0.001). Left lateral segment grafts were used significantly more frequently in the nonrelaparotomy group (P = 0.01). According to the multivariate analysis, the preoperative Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease (PELD)/Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of the early relaparotomy group was significantly higher than that of the nonearly relaparotomy group (13.7 versus 6.3; P = 0.04). According to the receiver operating characteristic curve, the preoperative PELD/MELD score cutoff point was 17.2. Early relaparotomy due to infectious causes led to significantly poorer graft survival than that due to noninfectious causes (P = 0.04). In conclusion, the recipient and graft survival rates of the early relaparotomy group were significantly lower than those of the nonearly relaparotomy group. A high preoperative PELD/MELD score was a risk factor for early relaparotomy. In particular, early relaparotomy due to infection showed a poor prognosis.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1066-1073Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.