iTalian RegIstry of doUble inner branch stent graft for arch PatHology (the TRIUmPH Registry).
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aorta, Thoracic
/ surgery
Aortic Diseases
/ diagnostic imaging
Blood Vessel Prosthesis
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation
/ adverse effects
Clinical Competence
Endovascular Procedures
/ adverse effects
Female
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Italy
Learning Curve
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
/ mortality
Prosthesis Design
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Stents
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Aortic arch
Endovascular aortic arch repair
Inner branch stent graft
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair
Thoracic stent graft
Journal
Journal of vascular surgery
ISSN: 1097-6809
Titre abrégé: J Vasc Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8407742
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
21
08
2018
accepted:
27
11
2018
pubmed:
16
3
2019
medline:
30
1
2020
entrez:
16
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective of this study was to assess early and midterm results after endovascular aortic arch repair using a double inner branch stent graft (DIBSG) in patients with aortic arch aneurysm or dissection unfit for open surgery. Between 2012 and 2018, there were 24 patients with aortic arch disease who were treated with a single model of a DIBSG (Terumo Aortic, Glasgow, United Kingdom) in nine Italian cardiovascular centers. We investigated technical success, mortality, occurrence of major complications, and need for reintervention in a multicenter, nonrandomized, retrospective fashion. The in-hospital mortality rate was 16.7%. Cerebrovascular events occurred in 25% of patients and major strokes in 12.5%. Two patients experienced a retrograde dissection (8.3%), whereas none reported any type I or type III endoleak. During a mean follow-up of 18 months (range, 1-60 months), one patient died of a nonaortic cause and one reported a nonarch-related major stroke. No late secondary intervention was needed during the follow-up. Excluding from the analysis the first six patients treated until 2014 as part of the learning curve, in-hospital mortality, major stroke, and retrograde dissection rates were 11.1%, 11.1%, and 5.6%, respectively. Endovascular aortic arch repair using this model of DIBSG is feasible, and results are acceptable for a new technique in a high-risk subset of patients. Operative mortality suffers the effect of a learning curve, whereas midterm aorta-related survival is promising. Endovascular repair of aortic arch disease with a DIBSG should always be considered to give high-risk patients a chance of repair. Large-scale studies are needed to assess the long-term durability of this technique.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30871889
pii: S0741-5214(19)30131-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.11.046
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
672-682.e1Investigateurs
Rocco Giudice
(R)
Gabriele Pogany
(G)
Claudia de Gregorio
(C)
Roberta Arzedi
(R)
Davide Pacini
(D)
Michele Antonello
(M)
Alberto Dall'Antonia
(A)
Yamume Tshomba
(Y)
Giovanni Tinelli
(G)
Antonio Rizza
(A)
Sergio Berti
(S)
Giuseppe Faggian
(G)
Ilaria Franzese
(I)
Gabriele Maritati
(G)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.