Failure to rescue as a source of variation in hospital mortality after rectal surgery: The Italian experience.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anastomotic Leak
/ epidemiology
Anemia
/ epidemiology
Blood Transfusion
Digestive System Surgical Procedures
Failure to Rescue, Health Care
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
Hospital Mortality
Hospitals, High-Volume
/ statistics & numerical data
Hospitals, Low-Volume
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Ileus
/ epidemiology
Intestinal Obstruction
/ epidemiology
Italy
/ epidemiology
Laparoscopy
Laparotomy
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Middle Aged
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Postoperative Hemorrhage
/ epidemiology
Proctectomy
Rectal Neoplasms
/ surgery
Rectum
/ surgery
Retrospective Studies
Surgical Wound Infection
/ epidemiology
Young Adult
FTR
Italian cohort
Morbidity
Rectal surgery
Journal
European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology
ISSN: 1532-2157
Titre abrégé: Eur J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8504356
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
22
10
2018
revised:
21
01
2019
accepted:
04
03
2019
pubmed:
25
3
2019
medline:
17
6
2020
entrez:
25
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Failure to rescue (FTR) patients from postoperative complications could contribute to the variability in surgical mortality seen among hospitals with different volumes. We sought to examine the impact of complications and FTR on mortality following rectal surgery. The National Italian Hospital Discharge Dataset allowed to identify 75,280 patients who underwent rectal surgery between 2002 and 2014. Hospital volume was stratified into tertiles. Rates of major complications, FTR from complications and mortality following rectal surgery were compared. During the study period, both the incidence of complications (2002, 23.7% versus 2014, 21.2%), and FTR decreased overtime (2002, 6.9% versus 2014, 3.8%) (both P < 0.001). The complication rate was 24.4% in low-, 21.6% in intermediate- and 20.4% in high-volume hospitals (P < 0.001). Complications were less common in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus open cases (18.2% versus 23.2%; P < 0.001). The most frequent complications included prolonged ileus or small bowel obstruction (5.3%), and anemia requiring blood transfusions (5.3%). The rate of FTR was 5.5%, 5.6% and 3.7% for low-, intermediate- and high-volume hospitals, respectively (P < 0.001). FTR after MIS was 2.6% vs. 5.5% after open surgery (P < 0.001). After accounting for patient and hospital characteristics, patients treated at low-volume hospitals were 23% more likely to die after a complication, compared to patients at high-volume hospitals (OR 1.23, 95%CI 1.13-1.33). Hospital volume is the strongest predictor of complication and FTR. The reduction in mortality in high-volume hospitals could be determined by the better ability to rescue patients. These findings support the centralization policy of rectal cancer treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30904244
pii: S0748-7983(19)30313-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.006
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1219-1224Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.