Modelling the Association between Core and Discretionary Energy Intake in Adults with and without Obesity.
beverage consumption
core intake
dietary compensation
discretionary intake
obesity
weight control
Journal
Nutrients
ISSN: 2072-6643
Titre abrégé: Nutrients
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101521595
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Mar 2019
22 Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
19
02
2019
revised:
14
03
2019
accepted:
20
03
2019
entrez:
27
3
2019
pubmed:
27
3
2019
medline:
26
7
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Many dietary recommendations for weight control rely on the assumption that greater core food intake will displace intake of energy-dense discretionary foods and beverages. However, there is little evidence to support these assumptions. This study examined the naturalistic relationship between daily core and discretionary energy intake, and with discretionary food and discretionary beverage intake, separately. The impact of weight status on these associations was also examined. One hundred participants completed a four-day (non-consecutive) estimated food diary. Discretionary foods and beverages were identified by reference to the Australian Dietary Guidelines. Non-discretionary items were considered core items. Simultaneous-equation random effects models using disaggregated dietary data controlling for sociodemographic variables were used to determine the association between various dietary components. Core energy intake correlated negatively with discretionary energy intake (cross-equation correlation, ρ = -0.49 (95% CI: -0.57, -0.39)). Its correlation with discretionary foods (-0.47 (-0.56, -0.37)) was stronger than that with discretionary beverages (-0.19 (-0.30, -0.07)) The correlation between core energy intake and discretionary energy intake was significantly stronger in participants who did not have obesity (-0.67 (-0.71, -0.50)) than those with obesity (-0.32 (-0.46, -0.17)) ( Core and discretionary energy intake share an inverse and potentially bidirectional, relationship that appears to be stronger with discretionary foods than discretionary beverages. These relationships were significantly weaker in participants with obesity which may indicate less precise dietary compensation in these individuals. While strategies that promote greater intake of core foods may assist with weight maintenance in individuals of healthy weight, its impact in individuals with obesity may be limited. These strategies should be accompanied by direct messages to reduce commensurately the intake of discretionary items, with special attention paid to discretionary beverage consumption.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Many dietary recommendations for weight control rely on the assumption that greater core food intake will displace intake of energy-dense discretionary foods and beverages. However, there is little evidence to support these assumptions. This study examined the naturalistic relationship between daily core and discretionary energy intake, and with discretionary food and discretionary beverage intake, separately. The impact of weight status on these associations was also examined.
METHOD
METHODS
One hundred participants completed a four-day (non-consecutive) estimated food diary. Discretionary foods and beverages were identified by reference to the Australian Dietary Guidelines. Non-discretionary items were considered core items. Simultaneous-equation random effects models using disaggregated dietary data controlling for sociodemographic variables were used to determine the association between various dietary components.
RESULT
RESULTS
Core energy intake correlated negatively with discretionary energy intake (cross-equation correlation, ρ = -0.49 (95% CI: -0.57, -0.39)). Its correlation with discretionary foods (-0.47 (-0.56, -0.37)) was stronger than that with discretionary beverages (-0.19 (-0.30, -0.07)) The correlation between core energy intake and discretionary energy intake was significantly stronger in participants who did not have obesity (-0.67 (-0.71, -0.50)) than those with obesity (-0.32 (-0.46, -0.17)) (
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Core and discretionary energy intake share an inverse and potentially bidirectional, relationship that appears to be stronger with discretionary foods than discretionary beverages. These relationships were significantly weaker in participants with obesity which may indicate less precise dietary compensation in these individuals. While strategies that promote greater intake of core foods may assist with weight maintenance in individuals of healthy weight, its impact in individuals with obesity may be limited. These strategies should be accompanied by direct messages to reduce commensurately the intake of discretionary items, with special attention paid to discretionary beverage consumption.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30909439
pii: nu11030683
doi: 10.3390/nu11030683
pmc: PMC6471653
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Am J Health Promot. 1995 Nov-Dec;10(2):98-104
pubmed: 10160052
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000 Mar;54(3):225-33
pubmed: 10713745
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Jun;24(6):794-800
pubmed: 10878689
Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Oct;72(4):929-36
pubmed: 11010933
Am J Clin Nutr. 2001 Jun;73(6):1010-8
pubmed: 11382653
Nutr Rev. 2001 Aug;59(8 Pt 1):247-58
pubmed: 11518179
Obes Res. 2001 Nov;9 Suppl 4:263S-270S
pubmed: 11707552
Physiol Behav. 2001 Nov-Dec;74(4-5):729-34
pubmed: 11790436
Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Mar;75(3):476-83
pubmed: 11864852
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002 Mar;26(3):384-8
pubmed: 11896494
Prev Med. 2003 Sep;37(3):198-208
pubmed: 12914825
Nutr Rev. 2004 Jan;62(1):1-17
pubmed: 14995052
Health Educ Res. 2004 Apr;19(2):165-74
pubmed: 15031276
JAMA. 2004 Jun 16;291(23):2828-33
pubmed: 15199032
J Nutr. 2004 Sep;134(9):2293-300
pubmed: 15333719
Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Mar;83(3):529-42
pubmed: 16522898
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1918 Dec;4(12):370-3
pubmed: 16576330
Obes Rev. 2006 May;7(2):163-82
pubmed: 16629873
Appetite. 2007 Nov;49(3):626-34
pubmed: 17574705
Int J Obes (Lond). 2007 Nov;31(11):1688-95
pubmed: 17579632
Eur J Clin Nutr. 1991 Dec;45(12):569-81
pubmed: 1810719
Physiol Behav. 2008 Mar 18;93(4-5):975-83
pubmed: 18261752
Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Dec;88(6):1504-10
pubmed: 19064509
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2009 May;234(5):542-52
pubmed: 19234056
J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Mar;109(3):430-7
pubmed: 19248858
Physiol Behav. 2009 Jul 14;97(5):551-60
pubmed: 19328819
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010 Feb;18(2):293-9
pubmed: 19629055
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010 Feb;64(2):194-202
pubmed: 19935818
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 Feb 02;7:12
pubmed: 20181070
Public Health Rep. 2010 Jan-Feb;125(1):88-95
pubmed: 20402200
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010 Dec;23(6):609-15
pubmed: 20626550
Am J Public Health. 2010 Sep;100(9):1730-6
pubmed: 20634464
J Nutr. 2011 May;141(5):1011S-22S
pubmed: 21451131
Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Mar;95(3):587-93
pubmed: 22258267
Nutr Rev. 2012 Mar;70(3):188-200
pubmed: 22364161
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 Apr;9(4):1368-78
pubmed: 22690199
Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Nov;96(5):1100-3
pubmed: 23034961
Int J Obes (Lond). 2013 Aug;37(8):1109-15
pubmed: 23164702
Nutr Rev. 2013 Jul;71(7):458-73
pubmed: 23815144
Appetite. 2014 May;76:44-9
pubmed: 24480668
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jul;68(7):778-85
pubmed: 24667750
Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jul;100 Suppl 1:412S-22S
pubmed: 24920033
Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Aug;100(2):567-76
pubmed: 24965308
Int J Public Health. 2015 Jan;60(1):79-90
pubmed: 25504430
Obes Rev. 2015 May;16(5):424-32
pubmed: 25752592
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015 Nov;69(11):1238-43
pubmed: 26130302
Nutrients. 2015 Sep 04;7(9):7421-36
pubmed: 26404367
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Feb;20(2):274-281
pubmed: 27572276
Eat Behav. 2017 Jan;24:61-65
pubmed: 28038436
Nutr Res. 2017 May;41:65-72
pubmed: 28506518
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 22;17(1):490
pubmed: 28532472
Appetite. 2017 Nov 1;118:113-119
pubmed: 28778813
J Am Diet Assoc. 1978 Jul;73(1):48-55
pubmed: 659761
Clin Investig. 1993 Jul;71(7):542-6
pubmed: 8374247
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997 Sep 20;827:392-407
pubmed: 9329770