Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for primary graft dysfunction after heart transplant.
Adult
Aged
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
/ adverse effects
Female
Heart Transplantation
/ adverse effects
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Primary Graft Dysfunction
/ etiology
Recovery of Function
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Severity of Illness Index
Time Factors
Time-to-Treatment
Treatment Outcome
ECMO
extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
heart transplant
primary graft failure
Journal
The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
ISSN: 1097-685X
Titre abrégé: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
received:
09
07
2018
revised:
13
01
2019
accepted:
17
02
2019
pubmed:
6
4
2019
medline:
3
3
2020
entrez:
6
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a useful treatment for severe primary graft dysfunction after heart transplant. The ideal timing of initiation is unknown. We retrospectively reviewed 362 adult heart transplant recipients at our center between January 2011 and December 2017. Thirty-eight patients (10.5%) experienced severe primary graft dysfunction treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. As our institution adopted a prompt venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation policy in 2015, patients were stratified into pre-2015 (conservative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: n = 18) and post-2015 (prompt extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: n = 20) cohorts. Clinical outcomes were compared. Baseline characteristics were similar (conservative vs prompt) except for age (51.82 vs 59.96 years, P = .036), aspartate transaminase (32 vs 21.5 U/L, P = .038), male donor (44.4 vs 80%, P = .042), and donor ejection fraction (60 vs 65%, P = .047). Median ischemic time was significantly longer in the conservative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cohort (210 vs 148 minutes, P = .005). Median time to initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was significantly shorter in the prompt extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cohort (7.26 vs 1.95 hours, P < .0001). There was no difference in intensive care unit stay or major complications. In-hospital mortality improved from 28% (conservative) to 5% (prompt, P = .083). Post-transplant survival at 1 year was 67% in the conservative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cohort and 90% in the prompt extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cohort (P = .117). There was no difference in the Kaplan-Meier survival curves (P = .071), although Cox regression suggested, but certainly did not prove, a 74.6% lower risk of mortality in the prompt extracorporeal membrane oxygenation group (P = .094). Prompt venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use for primary graft dysfunction after heart transplant results in excellent myocardial recovery and a possible decrease in mortality without increased risk of complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30948318
pii: S0022-5223(19)30512-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.02.065
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1576-1584.e3Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.