Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the impact of the G2 enhancer, bead sizes and lysing tubes on the bacterial community composition during DNA extraction from recalcitrant soil core samples based on community sequencing and qPCR.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
05
07
2018
accepted:
03
03
2019
entrez:
12
4
2019
pubmed:
12
4
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Soil DNA extraction encounters numerous challenges that can affect both yield and purity of the recovered DNA. Clay particles lead to reduced DNA extraction efficiency, and PCR inhibitors from the soil matrix can negatively affect downstream analyses when applying DNA sequencing. Further, these effects impede molecular analysis of bacterial community compositions in lower biomass samples, as often observed in deeper soil layers. Many studies avoid these complications by using indirect DNA extraction with prior separation of the cells from the matrix, but such methods introduce other biases that influence the resulting microbial community composition. To address these issues, a direct DNA extraction method was applied in combination with the use of a commercial product, the G2 DNA/RNA Enhancer, marketed as being capable of improving the amount of DNA recovered after the lysis step. The results showed that application of G2 increased DNA yields from the studied clayey soils from layers from 1.00 to 2.20 m. Importantly, the use of G2 did not introduce bias, as it did not result in any significant differences in the biodiversity of the bacterial community measured in terms of alpha and beta diversity and taxonomical composition. Finally, this study considered a set of customised lysing tubes for evaluating possible influences on the DNA yield. Tubes customization included different bead sizes and amounts, along with lysing tubes coming from two suppliers. Results showed that the lysing tubes with mixed beads allowed greater DNA recovery compared to the use of either 0.1 or 1.4 mm beads, irrespective of the tube supplier. These outcomes may help to improve commercial products in DNA/RNA extraction kits, besides raising awareness about the optimal choice of additives, offering opportunities for acquiring a better understanding of topics such as vertical microbial characterisation and environmental DNA recovery in low biomass samples.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30973938
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200979
pii: PONE-D-18-19940
pmc: PMC6459482
doi:
Substances chimiques
DNA, Bacterial
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0200979Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Carsten S. Jacobsen is a co-inventor of G2. His former employer, the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), issued the patent under Danish law (Improvement of lowbiomass soil DNA/RNA extraction yield and quality, European Patent Specification number EP 2 443 251 B1). GEUS later sold the patent to Ampliqon A/S (Odense, Denmark), which produces G2 today. The inventors receive a percentage of the net sales of G2. Ampliqon A/S, the current owner of the G2 patent, prepared and provided part of the laboratorial material used for this study. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. All the accumulated data from this study are presented and thus none of the authors have selectively included or excluded any of the results obtained.
Références
Water Res. 2018 Feb 1;129:1-10
pubmed: 29127829
Gigascience. 2012 Jul 12;1(1):7
pubmed: 23587224
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Aug;57(8):2260-8
pubmed: 1768098
Microbiome. 2017 Mar 3;5(1):27
pubmed: 28253908
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2005 Jul;79(1):89-95
pubmed: 15963357
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 9;8(1):5711
pubmed: 29632323
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014 Jan;87(1):217-30
pubmed: 24102625
J Microbiol Methods. 2011 Sep;86(3):397-400
pubmed: 21723887
Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2015 May 29;26:27663
pubmed: 26028277
Diabetologia. 2012 Aug;55(8):2285-94
pubmed: 22572803
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Mar;72(3):1719-28
pubmed: 16517615
Environ Sci Technol. 1988 Aug 1;22(8):982-4
pubmed: 22195724
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 28;9(2):e90234
pubmed: 24587293
Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6
pubmed: 20383131
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Jun;58(6):1930-9
pubmed: 1622268
BMC Biol. 2014 Nov 12;12:87
pubmed: 25387460
Environ Pollut. 2014 Mar;186:149-57
pubmed: 24374375
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 15;7(1):3608
pubmed: 28620188
J Microbiol Methods. 2001 May;45(1):7-20
pubmed: 11295193
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 06;8(6):e62692
pubmed: 23762227
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Sep;80(18):5717-22
pubmed: 25002428
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Apr;30(4):772-80
pubmed: 23329690
Science. 1997 Sep 5;277(5331):1453-62
pubmed: 9278503
Nat Methods. 2016 Jul;13(7):581-3
pubmed: 27214047
Gigascience. 2013 Nov 26;2(1):16
pubmed: 24280061
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Nov 20;82(3):878-87
pubmed: 26590282
Science. 1992 Oct 9;258(5080):278-81
pubmed: 17835126
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Dec;71(12):8228-35
pubmed: 16332807
Nat Methods. 2013 Jan;10(1):57-9
pubmed: 23202435
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29973
pubmed: 22253843
PLoS One. 2010 Mar 10;5(3):e9490
pubmed: 20224823
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011 Oct;78(1):31-49
pubmed: 21631545
Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Jan 1;29(1):181-4
pubmed: 11125085