[Perineal risk and obstetrical protection: A survey with birth professionals].

Risque périnéal et mesures de protection obstétricale : enquête auprès des professionnels de la naissance.
Déchirures périnéales Enquête de pratique Episiotomy Perineal protection Perineal risk Perineal tear Practice survey Protection périnéale Risque périnéal Épisiotomie

Journal

Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie
ISSN: 2468-7189
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101693805

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2019
Historique:
received: 28 01 2019
pubmed: 20 4 2019
medline: 24 1 2020
entrez: 20 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The main objective was to evaluate the practices declared by birth professionals in the Lorraine region about perineal obstetric protection (any perineal tear combined). The secondary objective was to evaluate prevention measures performed in practice by birth professionals according to the perineal risk subjectively estimated for each obstetric situation. This is a practice survey conducted through an anonymous questionnaire distributed to birth professionals (gynecologists, interns, midwife and midwife student) in October 2016. Topics covered concerned maternal, obstetric and fetal risk factors associated with perineal (1st to 4th degrees) lesions and the associated protective measures. A descriptive analysis of the data collected was conducted. One hundred and five professionals answered the questionnaire. The identified risk factors were consistent with those highlighted in the literature. Other factors, not known as associated with perineal risk, were cited by professionals (smoking, phototype). If the professional perceived a significant perineal risk, they more frequently practiced an episiotomy (15% vs. 0%, P<0.001) or considered that the delivery should be performed by an obstetrician (34% vs 8%, P<0.001). This evaluation shows that birth professionals know the main risk factors for perineal injury. On the other hand, they easily use perineal protection maneuvers (episiotomy for example) without real demonstrated effectiveness.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31003014
pii: S2468-7189(19)30162-X
doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2019.04.012
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

fre

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

504-509

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

C Bertholdt (C)

Pôle de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHRU de Nancy, 10, rue du Docteur-Heydenreich, 54000 Nancy, France; Inserm U1254, CHRU de Nancy, rue du Morvan, 54000 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France. Electronic address: c.bertholdt@chru-nancy.fr.

J Poujois (J)

Pôle de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHRU de Nancy, 10, rue du Docteur-Heydenreich, 54000 Nancy, France.

L Pouypoudat (L)

Pôle de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHRU de Nancy, 10, rue du Docteur-Heydenreich, 54000 Nancy, France.

S Gisbert (S)

Pôle de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHRU de Nancy, 10, rue du Docteur-Heydenreich, 54000 Nancy, France.

O Morel (O)

Pôle de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHRU de Nancy, 10, rue du Docteur-Heydenreich, 54000 Nancy, France; Inserm U1254, CHRU de Nancy, rue du Morvan, 54000 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH