Modelling strategies for assessing and increasing the effectiveness of new phenotyping techniques in plant breeding.

Crop growth model Genomic prediction Genotype-by-environment-interaction Genotype-to-phenotype model Mixed model Multi-environment model Multi-trait model Phenotyping Phenotyping platform Physiology Plant breeding Prediction Reaction norm Response surface Statistical genetics

Journal

Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology
ISSN: 1873-2259
Titre abrégé: Plant Sci
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 9882015

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2019
Historique:
received: 06 12 2017
revised: 05 06 2018
accepted: 19 06 2018
entrez: 21 4 2019
pubmed: 21 4 2019
medline: 14 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

New types of phenotyping tools generate large amounts of data on many aspects of plant physiology and morphology with high spatial and temporal resolution. These new phenotyping data are potentially useful to improve understanding and prediction of complex traits, like yield, that are characterized by strong environmental context dependencies, i.e., genotype by environment interactions. For an evaluation of the utility of new phenotyping information, we will look at how this information can be incorporated in different classes of genotype-to-phenotype (G2P) models. G2P models predict phenotypic traits as functions of genotypic and environmental inputs. In the last decade, access to high-density single nucleotide polymorphism markers (SNPs) and sequence information has boosted the development of a class of G2P models called genomic prediction models that predict phenotypes from genome wide marker profiles. The challenge now is to build G2P models that incorporate simultaneously extensive genomic information alongside with new phenotypic information. Beyond the modification of existing G2P models, new G2P paradigms are required. We present candidate G2P models for the integration of genomic and new phenotyping information and illustrate their use in examples. Special attention will be given to the modelling of genotype by environment interactions. The G2P models provide a framework for model based phenotyping and the evaluation of the utility of phenotyping information in the context of breeding programs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31003609
pii: S0168-9452(17)31154-8
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.06.018
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

23-39

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Fred A van Eeuwijk (FA)

Biometris, Wageningen University & Research Centre, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AC Wageningen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: fred.vaneeuwijk@wur.nl.

Daniela Bustos-Korts (D)

Biometris, Wageningen University & Research Centre, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AC Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Emilie J Millet (EJ)

Biometris, Wageningen University & Research Centre, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AC Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Martin P Boer (MP)

Biometris, Wageningen University & Research Centre, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AC Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Willem Kruijer (W)

Biometris, Wageningen University & Research Centre, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AC Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Addie Thompson (A)

Institute for Plant Sciences, Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.

Marcos Malosetti (M)

Biometris, Wageningen University & Research Centre, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AC Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Hiroyoshi Iwata (H)

Department of Agricultural and Environmental Biology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan.

Roberto Quiroz (R)

International Potato Center (CIP), P.O. Box 1558, Lima 12, Peru.

Christian Kuppe (C)

Institute for Bio-and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany.

Onno Muller (O)

Institute for Bio-and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany.

Konstantinos N Blazakis (KN)

Department of Horticultural Genetics and Biotechnology, Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania (MAICh), Alsylio Agrokipiou, P.O. Box 85, 73100 Chania-Crete, Greece.

Kang Yu (K)

Crop Science, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, Switzerland; Remote Sensing & Terrestrial Ecology, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium.

Francois Tardieu (F)

Laboratoire d'Ecophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress Environnementaux, UMR759, INRA, 34060 Montpellier, France.

Scott C Chapman (SC)

CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, 306 Carmody Road, St Lucia, QLD 4067, Australia; School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi

A scenario for an evolutionary selection of ageing.

Tristan Roget, Claire Macmurray, Pierre Jolivet et al.
1.00
Aging Selection, Genetic Biological Evolution Animals Fertility
Coal Metagenome Phylogeny Bacteria Genome, Bacterial
Biological Evolution History, 20th Century Selection, Genetic History, 19th Century Biology

Classifications MeSH