Does changing from a teacher-centered to a learner-centered context promote self-regulated learning: a qualitative study in a Japanese undergraduate setting.
Curriculum reform
Learner-centered learning
Self-regulated learning
Teacher-centered learning
Undergraduate education
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 May 2019
17 May 2019
Historique:
received:
07
09
2018
accepted:
09
04
2019
entrez:
19
5
2019
pubmed:
19
5
2019
medline:
24
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Previous studies indicate that a teacher-centered context could hinder undergraduates from self-regulated learning (SRL), whereas a learner-centered context could promote SRL. However, SRL development between a teacher-centered and a learner-centered context has not directly compared in undergraduate settings. Also, it is still unclear how a contextual change toward learner-centered learning could influence SRL in students, who are strongly accustomed to teacher-centered learning. We conducted three focus groups that examined 13 Japanese medical students who left a traditional curriculum composed of didactic lectures and frequent summative tests and entered a seven-month elective course (Free Course Student Doctor or FCSD). The FCSD emphasizes student-designed individualized learning with support and formative feedback from mentors chosen by students' preference. We also conducted two focus groups that examined 7 students who remained in the teacher-centered curriculum during the same period. Students were asked to discuss their 1) motivation, 2) learning strategies, and 3) self-reflection on self-study before and during the period. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis and code comparison between the two cohorts. The non-FCSD participants described their motivational status as being one among a crowd set by the teacher's yardstick. Their reflection focused on minimizing the gap between themselves and the teacher-set yardstick with strategies considered monotonous and homogeneous (e.g. memorization). FCSD participants described losing the teacher-set yardstick and constructing their future self-image as an alternative yardstick. They compared gaps between their present status and future self-image by self-reflection. To fill these gaps, they actively employed learning strategies used by doctors or mentors, leading to diversification of their learning strategies. A contextual change toward learner-centered learning could promote SRL even in students strongly accustomed to teacher-centered learning. In the learner-centered context, students began to construct their self-image, conduct self-reflection, and seek diverse learning strategies by referring to future 'self' models.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Previous studies indicate that a teacher-centered context could hinder undergraduates from self-regulated learning (SRL), whereas a learner-centered context could promote SRL. However, SRL development between a teacher-centered and a learner-centered context has not directly compared in undergraduate settings. Also, it is still unclear how a contextual change toward learner-centered learning could influence SRL in students, who are strongly accustomed to teacher-centered learning.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted three focus groups that examined 13 Japanese medical students who left a traditional curriculum composed of didactic lectures and frequent summative tests and entered a seven-month elective course (Free Course Student Doctor or FCSD). The FCSD emphasizes student-designed individualized learning with support and formative feedback from mentors chosen by students' preference. We also conducted two focus groups that examined 7 students who remained in the teacher-centered curriculum during the same period. Students were asked to discuss their 1) motivation, 2) learning strategies, and 3) self-reflection on self-study before and during the period. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis and code comparison between the two cohorts.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The non-FCSD participants described their motivational status as being one among a crowd set by the teacher's yardstick. Their reflection focused on minimizing the gap between themselves and the teacher-set yardstick with strategies considered monotonous and homogeneous (e.g. memorization). FCSD participants described losing the teacher-set yardstick and constructing their future self-image as an alternative yardstick. They compared gaps between their present status and future self-image by self-reflection. To fill these gaps, they actively employed learning strategies used by doctors or mentors, leading to diversification of their learning strategies.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
A contextual change toward learner-centered learning could promote SRL even in students strongly accustomed to teacher-centered learning. In the learner-centered context, students began to construct their self-image, conduct self-reflection, and seek diverse learning strategies by referring to future 'self' models.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31101111
doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1550-x
pii: 10.1186/s12909-019-1550-x
pmc: PMC6525356
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
152Subventions
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : JP17K08924
Références
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78
pubmed: 11392867
Am Psychol. 2002 Feb;57(2):89-99
pubmed: 11899565
Teach Learn Med. 2005 Spring;17(2):136-41
pubmed: 15833723
Med Teach. 2009 Oct;31(10):e489-93
pubmed: 19877858
Anat Sci Educ. 2010 Mar-Apr;3(2):64-72
pubmed: 20213851
Med Teach. 2011;33(11):875-86
pubmed: 22022899
Med Educ. 2012 Jan;46(1):71-9
pubmed: 22150198
Acad Med. 2012 Apr;87(4):545
pubmed: 22452919
Med Educ. 2012 Aug;46(8):738-47
pubmed: 22803751
Acad Med. 2012 Sep;87(9):1185-90
pubmed: 22836834
Acad Med. 2013 Jul;88(7):1048
pubmed: 23799447
Acad Med. 2014 Nov;89(11):1446-51
pubmed: 25054423
Med Teach. 2014 Nov;36(11):923-39
pubmed: 25072306
Int J Med Educ. 2015 Dec 28;6:213-5
pubmed: 26708325
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Sep 01;16(1):232
pubmed: 27585493
Acad Med. 2017 Aug;92(8):1100-1104
pubmed: 28177957
Med Educ. 2018 Jan;52(1):34-44
pubmed: 28984375
J Stud Int Educ. 2017 Jul;21(3):278-290
pubmed: 29046607
Med Teach. 2018 Mar;40(3):285-295
pubmed: 29172856
Med Teach. 2018 Aug;40(8):862-863
pubmed: 29327634
Med Educ. 2018 Oct;52(10):1008-1015
pubmed: 29943415