Systemic sclerostin antibody treatment increases osseointegration and biomechanical competence of zoledronic-acid-coated dental implants in a rat osteoporosis model.


Journal

European cells & materials
ISSN: 1473-2262
Titre abrégé: Eur Cell Mater
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 100973416

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 05 2019
Historique:
entrez: 22 5 2019
pubmed: 22 5 2019
medline: 30 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Osseointegration of dental implants can be promoted by implant-surface modifications using bisphosphonate coatings. In addition, it is of clinical interest to promote peri-implant bone formation and to restore bony structure in low bone-mass patients. The present study evaluated a combination of an anti-resorptive zoledronic acid (ZOL) implant-coating and a systemically applied sclerostin antibody, a known bone anabolic treatment principle, versus sole sclerostin antibody treatment or ZOL implant-coating in a rat osteoporosis model. Uncoated reference surface implants or ZOL-coated implants (n = 64/group) were inserted into the proximal tibia of aged osteoporotic rats three months following ovariectomy. 32 animals of each group received once weekly sclerostin antibody therapy. Osseointegration was assessed 2 or 4 weeks post-implantation by ex vivo µCT, histology and biomechanical testing. Overall implant survival rate was 97 %. Histomorphology revealed pronounced bone formation along the entire implant length of ZOL-coated implants. At 4 weeks following implant insertion, bone-implant contact, cancellous bone mineral density and bone volume/tissue volume were significantly increased for the combination of ZOL and sclerostin antibody as compared to sclerostin antibody or ZOL implant-coating alone. Removal torque was also significantly increased in the combination therapy group relative to animals receiving only sclerostin antibody therapy or ZOL-coated implants. In an osteoporotic rat model, the combination of anti-resorptive ZOL implant-coating and systemically applied sclerostin antibody led to significantly increased peri-implant bone formation. Therefore, the combination of ZOL and the osteoanabolic sclerostin antibody was more effective than either agent alone.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31112281
doi: 10.22203/eCM.v037a20
pii: vol037a20
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies 0
Bone Density Conservation Agents 0
Bone Morphogenetic Proteins 0
Coated Materials, Biocompatible 0
Dental Implants 0
Genetic Markers 0
Sost protein, rat 0
Zoledronic Acid 6XC1PAD3KF

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

333-346

Auteurs

P Korn (P)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.paula.korn@charite.de.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH