The Impact of DNA Polymerase and Number of Rounds of Amplification in PCR on 16S rRNA Gene Sequence Data.


Journal

mSphere
ISSN: 2379-5042
Titre abrégé: mSphere
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101674533

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 05 2019
Historique:
entrez: 24 5 2019
pubmed: 24 5 2019
medline: 7 2 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

PCR amplification of 16S rRNA genes is a critical yet underappreciated step in the generation of sequence data to describe the taxonomic composition of microbial communities. Numerous factors in the design of PCR can impact the sequencing error rate, the abundance of chimeric sequences, and the degree to which the fragments in the product represent their abundance in the original sample (i.e., bias). We compared the performance of high fidelity polymerases and various numbers of rounds of amplification when amplifying a mock community and human stool samples. Although it was impossible to derive specific recommendations, we did observe general trends. Namely, using a polymerase with the highest possible fidelity and minimizing the number of rounds of PCR reduced the sequencing error rate, fraction of chimeric sequences, and bias. Evidence of bias at the sequence level was subtle and could not be ascribed to the fragments' fraction of bases that were guanines or cytosines. When analyzing mock community data, the amount that the community deviated from the expected composition increased with the number of rounds of PCR. This bias was inconsistent for human stool samples. Overall, the results underscore the difficulty of comparing sequence data that are generated by different PCR protocols. However, the results indicate that the variation in human stool samples is generally larger than that introduced by the choice of polymerase or number of rounds of PCR.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31118299
pii: 4/3/e00163-19
doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00163-19
pmc: PMC6531881
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

DNA, Bacterial 0
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S 0
DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase EC 2.7.7.7

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA215574
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002240
Pays : United States
Organisme : CIHR
Pays : Canada

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Sze and Schloss.

Références

mBio. 2018 Jun 5;9(3):
pubmed: 29871915
mBio. 2016 May 17;7(3):
pubmed: 27190214
Nat Biotechnol. 2017 Nov;35(11):1069-1076
pubmed: 28967887
BMC Microbiol. 2017 Mar 31;17(1):78
pubmed: 28359329
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Jan 28;12:38
pubmed: 21276213
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010 Jun;307(1):80-6
pubmed: 20412303
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e27310
pubmed: 22194782
J Invest Dermatol. 2016 May;136(5):947-956
pubmed: 26829039
PeerJ. 2016 Oct 18;4:e2584
pubmed: 27781170
BMC Microbiol. 2014 Apr 23;14:103
pubmed: 24758293
mSphere. 2018 Mar 14;3(2):
pubmed: 29564398
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Aug 30;82(18):5519-29
pubmed: 27371581
mSystems. 2017 Mar 7;2(2):
pubmed: 28289731
BMC Microbiol. 2015 Mar 21;15:66
pubmed: 25880246
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Sep;79(17):5112-20
pubmed: 23793624
Nat Methods. 2006 Jul;3(7):545-50
pubmed: 16791213
Environ Microbiol. 2016 May;18(5):1403-14
pubmed: 26271760
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 Sep;34(9):942-9
pubmed: 27454739
mSystems. 2017 Mar 7;2(2):
pubmed: 28289733
Nature. 2012 Jun 13;486(7402):207-14
pubmed: 22699609
Nat Biotechnol. 2017 Nov;35(11):1077-1086
pubmed: 28967885
Water Res. 2016 Mar 1;90:216-224
pubmed: 26734781
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Sep;80(18):5717-22
pubmed: 25002428
Mol Biol Int. 2014;2014:287430
pubmed: 25197572
Nat Methods. 2016 Jul;13(7):581-3
pubmed: 27214047
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Dec;75(23):7537-41
pubmed: 19801464
Microbiology. 1996 May;142 ( Pt 5):1107-14
pubmed: 8704952
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Oct;64(10):3724-30
pubmed: 9758791
mBio. 2016 Aug 23;7(4):
pubmed: 27555308
Mol Ecol. 1997 May;6(5):475-82
pubmed: 9161015
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 07;10(8):e0134802
pubmed: 26252519
Genome Med. 2016 Apr 27;8(1):47
pubmed: 27121861
Cell. 2016 Aug 25;166(5):1103-1116
pubmed: 27565341
Genome Res. 2011 Mar;21(3):494-504
pubmed: 21212162
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Dec;71(12):8966-9
pubmed: 16332901
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 15;108 Suppl 1:4516-22
pubmed: 20534432
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 6;12(1):e0169774
pubmed: 28060945
mSystems. 2016 May 3;1(3):
pubmed: 27822526
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Feb;25(2):407-16
pubmed: 26604270
Nat Methods. 2013 Jan;10(1):57-9
pubmed: 23202435
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Dec 2;43(21):e143
pubmed: 26187991
mSphere. 2017 Mar 8;2(2):
pubmed: 28289728
mSystems. 2018 Apr 10;3(3):
pubmed: 29657969
Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Sep 15;24(18):3546-51
pubmed: 8836181
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Feb;62(2):625-30
pubmed: 8593063
BMC Biol. 2014 Nov 12;12:87
pubmed: 25387460
Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 15;27(16):2194-200
pubmed: 21700674
mBio. 2018 Jun 5;9(3):
pubmed: 29871916

Auteurs

Marc A Sze (MA)

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Patrick D Schloss (PD)

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA pschloss@umich.edu.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C

Classifications MeSH