Real-Life Efficacy of Osimertinib in Pretreated Octogenarian Patients with T790M-Mutated Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Acrylamides
/ therapeutic use
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aniline Compounds
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ genetics
Brain Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
/ drug therapy
ErbB Receptors
/ genetics
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Male
Mutation
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Salvage Therapy
Survival Rate
Journal
Targeted oncology
ISSN: 1776-260X
Titre abrégé: Target Oncol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101270595
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
24
5
2019
medline:
3
3
2020
entrez:
24
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The resistance mutation T790M is reported in 50-60% of patients pretreated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Osimertinib has been approved in these patients, but data in octogenarians remain rare. The objective of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate in real life the efficacy of osimertinib in a population of octogenarian patients. This retrospective multicentric study included pretreated octogenarian patients with EGFR T790M-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the setting of the French early access program for osimertinib. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from osimertinib initiation. In total, 43 patients were included (mean age 84.6 years; women 90.7%: adenocarcinoma 100%; never smokers 90.5%; at osimertinib initiation: performance status ≥ 2, 42.4%; stage 4, 93.0%; brain metastases 16.3%). Patients received a median of two lines of treatment before osimertinib initiation, and all received first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs before osimertinib (first line in 79.1%). Osimertinib was used as a second-line treatment in 41.9% of cases and third line or more in 58.1%. Median PFS was 17.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.2-19.0) months for the entire population: 20.6 (95% CI 18.8-not reached) months in patients with brain metastases and 16.7 (95% CI 10.4-18.9) months in patients without (p = 0.1). There was no significant difference for osimertinib treatment as second or third line or more (17.1 vs. 18.6 months, respectively). OS was 22.8 (95% CI 15.7-not reached) months from osimertinib initiation. The efficacy of osimertinib as second-line treatment or more in octogenarian pretreated patients with EGFR T790M-mutated advanced NSCLC in a real-life setting was similar to that in randomized controlled trials.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The resistance mutation T790M is reported in 50-60% of patients pretreated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Osimertinib has been approved in these patients, but data in octogenarians remain rare.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate in real life the efficacy of osimertinib in a population of octogenarian patients.
METHODS
This retrospective multicentric study included pretreated octogenarian patients with EGFR T790M-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the setting of the French early access program for osimertinib. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from osimertinib initiation.
RESULTS
In total, 43 patients were included (mean age 84.6 years; women 90.7%: adenocarcinoma 100%; never smokers 90.5%; at osimertinib initiation: performance status ≥ 2, 42.4%; stage 4, 93.0%; brain metastases 16.3%). Patients received a median of two lines of treatment before osimertinib initiation, and all received first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs before osimertinib (first line in 79.1%). Osimertinib was used as a second-line treatment in 41.9% of cases and third line or more in 58.1%. Median PFS was 17.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.2-19.0) months for the entire population: 20.6 (95% CI 18.8-not reached) months in patients with brain metastases and 16.7 (95% CI 10.4-18.9) months in patients without (p = 0.1). There was no significant difference for osimertinib treatment as second or third line or more (17.1 vs. 18.6 months, respectively). OS was 22.8 (95% CI 15.7-not reached) months from osimertinib initiation.
CONCLUSION
The efficacy of osimertinib as second-line treatment or more in octogenarian pretreated patients with EGFR T790M-mutated advanced NSCLC in a real-life setting was similar to that in randomized controlled trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31119481
doi: 10.1007/s11523-019-00646-4
pii: 10.1007/s11523-019-00646-4
doi:
Substances chimiques
Acrylamides
0
Aniline Compounds
0
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
osimertinib
3C06JJ0Z2O
EGFR protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
ErbB Receptors
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
307-314Références
Cancer Discov. 2014 Sep;4(9):1046-61
pubmed: 24893891
Cancer. 2019 Mar 15;125(6):892-901
pubmed: 30512189
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Dec;17(12):1643-1652
pubmed: 27751847
Am J Med Sci. 2014 Jul;348(1):65-70
pubmed: 24805784
J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 1;34(13):1476-83
pubmed: 26884557
Lancet. 2011 Sep 17;378(9796):1079-88
pubmed: 21831418
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 1;24(22):3657-63
pubmed: 16877734
Lung Cancer. 2019 Jan;127:96-102
pubmed: 30642559
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Oct 15;22(20):5130-5140
pubmed: 27435396
Acta Pharm Sin B. 2015 Sep;5(5):390-401
pubmed: 26579470
Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 9;8(43):75712-75726
pubmed: 29088904
Lancet. 2016 Apr 2;387(10026):1415-1426
pubmed: 26777916
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 30;372(18):1689-99
pubmed: 25923549
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 11;378(2):113-125
pubmed: 29151359
Ann Oncol. 2016 Sep;27(suppl 5):v1-v27
pubmed: 27664245
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Jan 6;91(1):66-72
pubmed: 9890172
Ann Oncol. 2014 Jul;25(7):1270-83
pubmed: 24638905
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct 1;34(28):3375-82
pubmed: 27354477
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 20;31(27):3327-34
pubmed: 23816960
N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 3;361(10):958-67
pubmed: 19692684
Int J Cancer. 2010 Dec 15;127(12):2893-917
pubmed: 21351269
Oncologist. 2018 Oct;23(10):1199-1209
pubmed: 29650684
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 10;36(26):2702-2709
pubmed: 30059262
Target Oncol. 2016 Apr;11(2):167-74
pubmed: 26315967
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):629-640
pubmed: 27959700
Eur Respir Rev. 2014 Sep;23(133):356-66
pubmed: 25176972