Genome-wide association mapping in a diverse spring barley collection reveals the presence of QTL hotspots and candidate genes for root and shoot architecture traits at seedling stage.
Barley
Candidate genes
Genome-wide association study
Osmotic stress
Root architecture
Journal
BMC plant biology
ISSN: 1471-2229
Titre abrégé: BMC Plant Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967807
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 May 2019
23 May 2019
Historique:
received:
06
12
2018
accepted:
13
05
2019
entrez:
25
5
2019
pubmed:
28
5
2019
medline:
13
7
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Adaptation to drought-prone environments requires robust root architecture. Genotypes with a more vigorous root system have the potential to better adapt to soils with limited moisture content. However, root architecture is complex at both, phenotypic and genetic level. Customized mapping panels in combination with efficient screenings methods can resolve the underlying genetic factors of root traits. A mapping panel of 233 spring barley genotypes was evaluated for root and shoot architecture traits under non-stress and osmotic stress. A genome-wide association study elucidated 65 involved genomic regions. Among them were 34 root-specific loci, eleven hotspots with associations to up to eight traits and twelve stress-specific loci. A list of candidate genes was established based on educated guess. Selected genes were tested for associated polymorphisms. By this, 14 genes were identified as promising candidates, ten remained suggestive and 15 were rejected. The data support the important role of flowering time genes, including HvPpd-H1, HvCry2, HvCO4 and HvPRR73. Moreover, seven root-related genes, HERK2, HvARF04, HvEXPB1, PIN5, PIN7, PME5 and WOX5 are confirmed as promising candidates. For the QTL with the highest allelic effect for root thickness and plant biomass a homologue of the Arabidopsis Trx-m3 was revealed as the most promising candidate. This study provides a catalogue of hotspots for seedling growth, root and stress-specific genomic regions along with candidate genes for future potential incorporation in breeding attempts for enhanced yield potential, particularly in drought-prone environments. Root architecture is under polygenic control. The co-localization of well-known major genes for barley development and flowering time with QTL hotspots highlights their importance for seedling growth. Association analysis revealed the involvement of HvPpd-H1 in the development of the root system. The co-localization of root QTL with HERK2, HvARF04, HvEXPB1, PIN5, PIN7, PME5 and WOX5 represents a starting point to explore the roles of these genes in barley. Accordingly, the genes HvHOX2, HsfA2b, HvHAK2, and Dhn9, known to be involved in abiotic stress response, were located within stress-specific QTL regions and await future validation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Adaptation to drought-prone environments requires robust root architecture. Genotypes with a more vigorous root system have the potential to better adapt to soils with limited moisture content. However, root architecture is complex at both, phenotypic and genetic level. Customized mapping panels in combination with efficient screenings methods can resolve the underlying genetic factors of root traits.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A mapping panel of 233 spring barley genotypes was evaluated for root and shoot architecture traits under non-stress and osmotic stress. A genome-wide association study elucidated 65 involved genomic regions. Among them were 34 root-specific loci, eleven hotspots with associations to up to eight traits and twelve stress-specific loci. A list of candidate genes was established based on educated guess. Selected genes were tested for associated polymorphisms. By this, 14 genes were identified as promising candidates, ten remained suggestive and 15 were rejected. The data support the important role of flowering time genes, including HvPpd-H1, HvCry2, HvCO4 and HvPRR73. Moreover, seven root-related genes, HERK2, HvARF04, HvEXPB1, PIN5, PIN7, PME5 and WOX5 are confirmed as promising candidates. For the QTL with the highest allelic effect for root thickness and plant biomass a homologue of the Arabidopsis Trx-m3 was revealed as the most promising candidate.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study provides a catalogue of hotspots for seedling growth, root and stress-specific genomic regions along with candidate genes for future potential incorporation in breeding attempts for enhanced yield potential, particularly in drought-prone environments. Root architecture is under polygenic control. The co-localization of well-known major genes for barley development and flowering time with QTL hotspots highlights their importance for seedling growth. Association analysis revealed the involvement of HvPpd-H1 in the development of the root system. The co-localization of root QTL with HERK2, HvARF04, HvEXPB1, PIN5, PIN7, PME5 and WOX5 represents a starting point to explore the roles of these genes in barley. Accordingly, the genes HvHOX2, HsfA2b, HvHAK2, and Dhn9, known to be involved in abiotic stress response, were located within stress-specific QTL regions and await future validation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31122195
doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1828-5
pii: 10.1186/s12870-019-1828-5
pmc: PMC6533710
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
216Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
ID : KI 1465/8-1
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
ID : KI 1465/9-1
Organisme : Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD)
ID : A/14/05106
Organisme : Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
ID : 0315969D
Références
Plant J. 2013 Nov;76(4):718-27
pubmed: 23998490
Plant Physiol. 2003 Apr;131(4):1591-601
pubmed: 12692318
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Dec 1;34(12):3299-3302
pubmed: 29029172
Theor Appl Genet. 2012 Oct;125(6):1313-24
pubmed: 22718302
Theor Appl Genet. 1995 Jun;90(7-8):969-81
pubmed: 24173051
Plant Physiol. 2005 Nov;139(3):1255-67
pubmed: 16215225
Theor Appl Genet. 2012 Feb;124(2):233-46
pubmed: 21915710
Plant Genome. 2016 Jul;9(2):
pubmed: 27898829
Plant Cell Environ. 2014 Jun;37(6):1321-7
pubmed: 24895755
Mol Plant. 2018 Jan 8;11(1):226-229
pubmed: 29056533
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 14;10(10):e0140246
pubmed: 26465604
Mol Plant. 2016 Feb 1;9(2):245-260
pubmed: 26584715
Plant Cell Physiol. 1998 Oct;39(10):1111-8
pubmed: 9871369
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Feb 03;7:47
pubmed: 26870066
Plant Cell. 2005 May;17(5):1387-96
pubmed: 15829602
Nature. 2003 Apr 10;422(6932):618-21
pubmed: 12687001
Plant Sci. 2014 Jul;224:9-19
pubmed: 24908501
Nat Genet. 2017 Jan;49(1):157-161
pubmed: 27841879
BMC Genomics. 2015 Apr 12;16:290
pubmed: 25887319
J Exp Bot. 2015 Apr;66(8):2283-92
pubmed: 25740921
Theor Appl Genet. 2003 Nov;107(7):1215-25
pubmed: 12898030
Theor Appl Genet. 2005 Aug;111(4):688-95
pubmed: 16021413
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 23;9(9):e107684
pubmed: 25247812
Plant J. 2005 Jul;43(1):47-56
pubmed: 15960615
Theor Appl Genet. 2013 Sep;126(9):2335-51
pubmed: 23771136
Nat Commun. 2017 Oct 16;8(1):936
pubmed: 29038434
Plant Physiol. 2006 Jul;141(3):1149-58
pubmed: 16679418
Plant Physiol. 2007 Jan;143(1):225-35
pubmed: 17114273
Nat Commun. 2012 Jul 03;3:941
pubmed: 22760640
Physiol Plant. 2013 Aug;148(4):502-11
pubmed: 23136980
Plant Physiol. 2017 Aug;174(4):2397-2408
pubmed: 28655778
Mol Plant. 2015 Jun;8(6):964-6
pubmed: 25804976
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 27;9(10):e108407
pubmed: 25347794
Plant J. 2012 Mar;69(5):868-80
pubmed: 22040323
Theor Appl Genet. 2013 Nov;126(11):2803-24
pubmed: 23918065
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 24;9(11):e113120
pubmed: 25420105
J Exp Bot. 2002 Jan;53(366):33-7
pubmed: 11741038
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Jul 19;7:1061
pubmed: 27486472
Front Genet. 2016 Jun 24;7:117
pubmed: 27446200
Elife. 2018 Sep 18;7:
pubmed: 30226465
BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Oct 24;8:291
pubmed: 18950478
Mol Plant. 2015 May;8(5):734-46
pubmed: 25655826
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Nov 17;8:1950
pubmed: 29204147
J Exp Bot. 2018 Jul 18;69(16):3811-3822
pubmed: 29767798
Nat Commun. 2015 Feb 27;6:6386
pubmed: 25722057
BMC Plant Biol. 2012 Jan 27;12:16
pubmed: 22284310
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Apr 19;19(4):
pubmed: 29671782
Theor Appl Genet. 2003 Dec;108(1):181-8
pubmed: 13679983
Theor Appl Genet. 2009 Jan;118(2):259-73
pubmed: 18830577
Ann Bot. 2005 May;95(6):891-900
pubmed: 15767269
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45307
pubmed: 23028921
Theor Appl Genet. 2006 Mar;112(5):779-86
pubmed: 16425022
Plant Cell Physiol. 2008 Mar;49(3):481-7
pubmed: 18202002
Genome Biol. 2009;10(12):249
pubmed: 20053306
Plant J. 2004 Oct;40(1):75-87
pubmed: 15361142
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Aug;40(15):e115
pubmed: 22730293
Nat Genet. 2012 Dec;44(12):1388-92
pubmed: 23160098
Front Plant Sci. 2013 Nov 05;4:442
pubmed: 24204374
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 10;97(21):11632-7
pubmed: 11005831
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003 Feb;6(1):7-12
pubmed: 12495745
EMBO J. 1998 Dec 1;17(23):6903-11
pubmed: 9843496
Science. 2018 Dec 21;362(6421):1407-1410
pubmed: 30573626
Plant Physiol. 2003 Apr;131(4):1855-67
pubmed: 12692345
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Jun 27;7:909
pubmed: 27446139
Science. 2005 Nov 11;310(5750):1031-4
pubmed: 16284181
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2010 Mar;11(3):169-76
pubmed: 20205303
Theor Appl Genet. 2014 Nov;127(11):2293-311
pubmed: 25230896
Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):518
pubmed: 25476012
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Sep 07;8:1554
pubmed: 28936224
Funct Plant Biol. 2013 May;40(5):516-530
pubmed: 32481128
Nat Genet. 2013 Sep;45(9):1097-102
pubmed: 23913002
Nature. 2009 Jun 25;459(7250):1136-40
pubmed: 19506555
Theor Appl Genet. 2018 Apr;131(4):873-886
pubmed: 29350248
PLoS One. 2016 May 26;11(5):e0155938
pubmed: 27227880
Theor Appl Genet. 2011 Mar;122(4):759-69
pubmed: 21153397
Plant Physiol. 2016 Sep;172(1):405-15
pubmed: 27457126
Eur J Cell Biol. 2010 Feb-Mar;89(2-3):138-44
pubmed: 20036441
Plant J. 2013 Dec;76(6):1016-29
pubmed: 24128328
New Phytol. 2013 Aug;199(3):639-49
pubmed: 24010138
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 5;107(1):490-5
pubmed: 20018663
Plants (Basel). 2015 Aug 11;4(3):548-72
pubmed: 27135341
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 8;110(41):16675-80
pubmed: 24065816
Plant J. 2014 Sep;79(6):981-92
pubmed: 24947331
New Phytol. 2014 Jul;203(1):195-205
pubmed: 24684319
Nature. 2017 Apr 26;544(7651):427-433
pubmed: 28447635
Plant Cell. 2013 Feb;25(2):609-24
pubmed: 23396830
J Exp Bot. 2016 Apr;67(8):2507-18
pubmed: 26936829
Cell. 2000 May 26;101(5):555-67
pubmed: 10850497
J Exp Bot. 2009;60(9):2565-73
pubmed: 19439763
Mol Breed. 2014;34(4):1629-1645
pubmed: 25506257
Funct Integr Genomics. 2013 Jun;13(2):167-77
pubmed: 23443578
J Exp Bot. 2015 Jan;66(1):245-56
pubmed: 25371500
J Appl Genet. 2014 Nov;55(4):433-47
pubmed: 24899566
Plant Physiol. 2014 Apr 23;165(2):506-518
pubmed: 24760818
J Exp Bot. 2010;61(2):311-3
pubmed: 20051353
J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2018 Jun;16(1):203-212
pubmed: 30647723
BMC Genomics. 2008 Aug 27;9:401
pubmed: 18752688
Plant Cell. 2002 Mar;14(3):589-97
pubmed: 11910006
BMC Biol. 2015 Nov 27;13:102
pubmed: 26614311
Nat Genet. 2019 Feb;51(2):319-326
pubmed: 30420647
Plant Genome. 2018 Mar;11(1):
pubmed: 29505630
Theor Appl Genet. 2006 Oct;113(6):1131-46
pubmed: 16909280
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 13;11(12):e0168028
pubmed: 27959947
Plant J. 2007 May;50(4):649-59
pubmed: 17425722
J Hered. 2002 Jan-Feb;93(1):77-8
pubmed: 12011185
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Oct 31;5:576
pubmed: 25400646
J Exp Bot. 2016 Feb;67(4):1161-78
pubmed: 26880749
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Feb 09;7:114
pubmed: 26904076
Plant Signal Behav. 2009 Jul;4(7):655-9
pubmed: 19820302
New Phytol. 2013 Feb;197(3):939-948
pubmed: 23293955
BMC Plant Biol. 2017 Aug 10;17(1):137
pubmed: 28797222
Plant Cell. 2003 Nov;15(11):2532-50
pubmed: 14555694
BMC Genet. 2014 Oct 07;15:107
pubmed: 25286820
BMC Genet. 2012 Oct 20;13:88
pubmed: 23083378
BMC Plant Biol. 2015 May 22;15:125
pubmed: 25998066