Big Data Approaches to Phenotyping Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Automated Lesion Segmentation of Multi-Center Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Algorithms
Big Data
Brain Ischemia
/ diagnostic imaging
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Female
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Machine Learning
Male
Middle Aged
Neural Networks, Computer
Observer Variation
Phenotype
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Socioeconomic Factors
Stroke
/ diagnostic imaging
diffusion magnetic resonance imaging
machine learning
phenotype
risk factors
stroke
Journal
Stroke
ISSN: 1524-4628
Titre abrégé: Stroke
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0235266
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
11
6
2019
medline:
20
2
2020
entrez:
11
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background and Purpose- We evaluated deep learning algorithms' segmentation of acute ischemic lesions on heterogeneous multi-center clinical diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data sets and explored the potential role of this tool for phenotyping acute ischemic stroke. Methods- Ischemic stroke data sets from the MRI-GENIE (MRI-Genetics Interface Exploration) repository consisting of 12 international genetic research centers were retrospectively analyzed using an automated deep learning segmentation algorithm consisting of an ensemble of 3-dimensional convolutional neural networks. Three ensembles were trained using data from the following: (1) 267 patients from an independent single-center cohort, (2) 267 patients from MRI-GENIE, and (3) mixture of (1) and (2). The algorithms' performances were compared against manual outlines from a separate 383 patient subset from MRI-GENIE. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression with respect to demographics, stroke subtypes, and vascular risk factors were performed to identify phenotypes associated with large acute diffusion-weighted MRI volumes and greater stroke severity in 2770 MRI-GENIE patients. Stroke topography was investigated. Results- The ensemble consisting of a mixture of MRI-GENIE and single-center convolutional neural networks performed best. Subset analysis comparing automated and manual lesion volumes in 383 patients found excellent correlation (ρ=0.92; P<0.0001). Median (interquartile range) diffusion-weighted MRI lesion volumes from 2770 patients were 3.7 cm
Identifiants
pubmed: 31177973
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025373
pmc: PMC6728139
mid: NIHMS1528427
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1734-1741Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : K23 NS064052
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS042733
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS082285
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS030678
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS103824
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : P50 NS051343
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS039987
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS063925
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS029993
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCRR NIH HHS
ID : S10 RR023043
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS100417
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCRR NIH HHS
ID : S10 RR019307
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : U10 NS077311
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS100178
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS086905
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : P30 DK072488
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : U01 NS069208
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : P41 EB015896
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCRR NIH HHS
ID : S10 RR023401
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS059775
Pays : United States
Références
Stroke. 2006 Dec;37(12):2951-6
pubmed: 17082470
Eur Stroke J. 2017 Sep;2(3):229-237
pubmed: 31008316
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Nov;17(3):143-55
pubmed: 12391568
Neuroimage. 1995 Jun;2(2):89-101
pubmed: 9343592
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):782-90
pubmed: 21979382
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Jun;40(6):938-945
pubmed: 31147354
Radiology. 1999 Sep;212(3):785-92
pubmed: 10478247
Neurol Genet. 2017 Aug 24;3(5):e180
pubmed: 28852707
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
pubmed: 12958120
Stroke. 2001 Apr;32(4):933-42
pubmed: 11283394
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Jun 13;15:633-643
pubmed: 28664034
Magn Reson Med. 2001 May;45(5):734-40
pubmed: 11323798
Med Image Anal. 2017 Feb;36:61-78
pubmed: 27865153
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Feb;15(2):174-184
pubmed: 26708676
Nat Genet. 2018 Apr;50(4):524-537
pubmed: 29531354
Stroke. 2013 Oct;44(10):2694-702
pubmed: 24021684