After-hours emergency radiology CT reporting by radiology registrars at an Australian level 1 trauma centre: A review of discrepancies between preliminary and final reports.
CT
after-hours
radiology
registrar
report
Journal
Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology
ISSN: 1754-9485
Titre abrégé: J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101469340
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
27
01
2019
accepted:
26
05
2019
pubmed:
30
6
2019
medline:
11
3
2020
entrez:
29
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is reliance on radiology registrar reporting of after-hours CT scans in many public hospitals across Australia and New Zealand. This study evaluates the extent and nature of CT reporting discrepancies after-hours by comparing trainee preliminary reports with consultant finalised reports. A retrospective review of all after-hours CT scans between January and December 2014 by radiology trainees at a level 1 trauma centre was performed. Discrepancies were classified as major or minor, by year level of trainee, time of report and scan type (Trauma vs. Non-Trauma). Major discrepancies were investigated to assess if they led to increased morbidity, mortality or a change in treatment. 17,948 after-hours CT scans were performed. A total of 1235 preliminary reports required addendums (discrepancy rate of 6.9%). There were 630 Trauma and 605 Non-Trauma studies. There were 56 major (0.3%) and 1179 minor (6.6%) discrepancies. Of the 56 major discrepancies there were 12 (0.3%) in the Trauma and 44 (6.6%) in the Non-Trauma groups. There were no adverse patient outcomes due to any major discrepancy. There were more minor discrepancies in reports of Trauma CTs compared to Non-Trauma (P ≤ 0.0001). No relationship between the time of report issued and discrepancy rate (P = 0.811) was observed. There was a lower discrepancy rate the more experienced the registrar from year 2 to advanced fellowship (P = 0.003). The discrepancy rates of after-hours CT trainee reports were lower at this institution compared to international literature (6.9% vs. 7.7%). The majority of preliminary trainee reports were accurate with no increased morbidity or mortality resulting from major discrepancies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31250525
doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12921
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
567-572Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.
Références
Astill CS, Agzarian MJ. Discrepancy rates in reporting of acute stroke CT. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2017; 61: 317-20.
Chung J, Strigel R. Overnight resident interpretation of torso CT at a level 1 trauma center - an analysis and review of literature. Acad Radiol 2009; 16: 1155-60.
Wu M, McInnes M, Macdonald D, Kielar A, Duigenan S. CT in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of interpretation discrepancy rates. Radiology 2014; 270: 717-35.
Walls J, Hunter N, Brasher P, Ho S. The DePICTORS study: discrepancies in preliminary interpretation of CT scans between on-call residents and staff. Emerg Radiol 2009; 16: 303-8.
Strub WM, Vagal AA, Tomsick T. Overnight resident preliminary interpretations on CT examinations: Should the process continue? Emerg Radiol 2006; 13: 19-23.
Terreblanche OD, Andronikou S, Hlabangana LT, Brown T, Boshoff PE. Should registrars be reporting after-hours CT scans? A calculation of error rate and the influencing factors in South Africa. Acta Radiol 2012; 53: 61-8.
Hillier JC, Tattersall DJ, Gleeson FV. Trainee reporting of computed tomography examinations: do they make mistakes and does it matter? Clin Radiol 2004; 59: 157-62.
Briggs RH, Rowbotham E, Johnstone AL, Chalmers AG. Provisional reporting of polytrauma CT by on-call radiology registrars. Is it safe? Clin Radiol 2010; 65: 616-22.
Weinberg BD, Richter MD, Champine JG, Morriss MC, Browning T. Radiology resident preliminary reporting in an independent call environment: multiyear assessment of volume, timeliness and accuracy. J Am Coll Radiol 2016; 12: 95-100.
Ruchman RB, Jaeger J, Wiggins EF 3rd et al. Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189: 523-6.
Cooper VF, Goodhartz LA, Nemcek AA Jr, Ryu RK. Radiology resident interpretations of on-call imaging studies: the incidence of major discrepancies. Acad Radiol 2008; 15: 1198-204.
Cheng T, Dumire R, Golden S, Gregory J. Impact on patient care of discordance in radiology readings between external overnight radiology services and staff radiology readings at a level 1 trauma center. Am J Surg 2013; 205: 280-2.
Wechsler RJ, Spettell Kurtz. Effects of training and experience in interpretation of emergency body CT scans. Radiology 1998; 199: 717-20.