After-hours emergency radiology CT reporting by radiology registrars at an Australian level 1 trauma centre: A review of discrepancies between preliminary and final reports.


Journal

Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology
ISSN: 1754-9485
Titre abrégé: J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101469340

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Historique:
received: 27 01 2019
accepted: 26 05 2019
pubmed: 30 6 2019
medline: 11 3 2020
entrez: 29 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There is reliance on radiology registrar reporting of after-hours CT scans in many public hospitals across Australia and New Zealand. This study evaluates the extent and nature of CT reporting discrepancies after-hours by comparing trainee preliminary reports with consultant finalised reports. A retrospective review of all after-hours CT scans between January and December 2014 by radiology trainees at a level 1 trauma centre was performed. Discrepancies were classified as major or minor, by year level of trainee, time of report and scan type (Trauma vs. Non-Trauma). Major discrepancies were investigated to assess if they led to increased morbidity, mortality or a change in treatment. 17,948 after-hours CT scans were performed. A total of 1235 preliminary reports required addendums (discrepancy rate of 6.9%). There were 630 Trauma and 605 Non-Trauma studies. There were 56 major (0.3%) and 1179 minor (6.6%) discrepancies. Of the 56 major discrepancies there were 12 (0.3%) in the Trauma and 44 (6.6%) in the Non-Trauma groups. There were no adverse patient outcomes due to any major discrepancy. There were more minor discrepancies in reports of Trauma CTs compared to Non-Trauma (P ≤ 0.0001). No relationship between the time of report issued and discrepancy rate (P = 0.811) was observed. There was a lower discrepancy rate the more experienced the registrar from year 2 to advanced fellowship (P = 0.003). The discrepancy rates of after-hours CT trainee reports were lower at this institution compared to international literature (6.9% vs. 7.7%). The majority of preliminary trainee reports were accurate with no increased morbidity or mortality resulting from major discrepancies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31250525
doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12921
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

567-572

Informations de copyright

© 2019 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.

Références

Astill CS, Agzarian MJ. Discrepancy rates in reporting of acute stroke CT. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2017; 61: 317-20.
Chung J, Strigel R. Overnight resident interpretation of torso CT at a level 1 trauma center - an analysis and review of literature. Acad Radiol 2009; 16: 1155-60.
Wu M, McInnes M, Macdonald D, Kielar A, Duigenan S. CT in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of interpretation discrepancy rates. Radiology 2014; 270: 717-35.
Walls J, Hunter N, Brasher P, Ho S. The DePICTORS study: discrepancies in preliminary interpretation of CT scans between on-call residents and staff. Emerg Radiol 2009; 16: 303-8.
Strub WM, Vagal AA, Tomsick T. Overnight resident preliminary interpretations on CT examinations: Should the process continue? Emerg Radiol 2006; 13: 19-23.
Terreblanche OD, Andronikou S, Hlabangana LT, Brown T, Boshoff PE. Should registrars be reporting after-hours CT scans? A calculation of error rate and the influencing factors in South Africa. Acta Radiol 2012; 53: 61-8.
Hillier JC, Tattersall DJ, Gleeson FV. Trainee reporting of computed tomography examinations: do they make mistakes and does it matter? Clin Radiol 2004; 59: 157-62.
Briggs RH, Rowbotham E, Johnstone AL, Chalmers AG. Provisional reporting of polytrauma CT by on-call radiology registrars. Is it safe? Clin Radiol 2010; 65: 616-22.
Weinberg BD, Richter MD, Champine JG, Morriss MC, Browning T. Radiology resident preliminary reporting in an independent call environment: multiyear assessment of volume, timeliness and accuracy. J Am Coll Radiol 2016; 12: 95-100.
Ruchman RB, Jaeger J, Wiggins EF 3rd et al. Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189: 523-6.
Cooper VF, Goodhartz LA, Nemcek AA Jr, Ryu RK. Radiology resident interpretations of on-call imaging studies: the incidence of major discrepancies. Acad Radiol 2008; 15: 1198-204.
Cheng T, Dumire R, Golden S, Gregory J. Impact on patient care of discordance in radiology readings between external overnight radiology services and staff radiology readings at a level 1 trauma center. Am J Surg 2013; 205: 280-2.
Wechsler RJ, Spettell Kurtz. Effects of training and experience in interpretation of emergency body CT scans. Radiology 1998; 199: 717-20.

Auteurs

Gerard S Goh (GS)

Radiology Department, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Georgina Aberdein (G)

Radiology Department, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Ramesh Chokka (R)

Radiology Department, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Xavier Yu (X)

Radiology Department, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Dinesh Varma (D)

Radiology Department, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH