Impact of circulating tumor DNA mutant allele fraction on prognosis in RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer.
MAF
RAS analysis
circulating tumor DNA
metastatic colorectal cancer
prognostic biomarker
Journal
Molecular oncology
ISSN: 1878-0261
Titre abrégé: Mol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101308230
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
received:
21
10
2018
revised:
11
05
2019
accepted:
15
07
2019
pubmed:
20
7
2019
medline:
1
5
2020
entrez:
20
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite major advances in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the survival rate remains very poor. This study aims at exploring the prognostic value of RAS-mutant allele fraction (MAF) in plasma in mCRC. Forty-seven plasma samples from 37 RAS-mutated patients with nonresectable metastases were tested for RAS in circulating tumor DNA using BEAMing before first- and/or second-line treatment. RAS MAF was correlated with several clinical parameters (number of metastatic sites, hepatic volume, carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9 levels, primary site location, and treatment line) and clinical outcome [progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)]. An independent cohort of 32 patients from the CAPRI-GOIM trial was assessed for clinical outcome based on plasma baseline MAF. RAS MAF analysis at baseline revealed a significant correlation with longer OS [Hazard ratios (HR) = 3.514; P = 0.00066]. Patients with lower MAF also showed a tendency to longer PFS, although not statistically significant. Multivariate analysis showed RAS MAFs as an independent prognostic factor in both OS (HR = 2.73; P = 0.006) and first-line PFS (HR = 3.74; P = 0.049). Tumor response to treatment in patients with higher MAF was progression disease (P = 0.007). Patients with low MAFs at baseline in the CAPRI-GOIM group also showed better OS [HR = 3.84; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.5-9.6; P = 0.004] and better PFS (HR = 2.5; 95% CI: 1.07-5.62; P = 0.033). This minimally invasive test may help in adding an independent factor to better estimate outcomes before initiating treatment. Further prospective studies using MAF as a stratification factor could further validate its utility in clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31322322
doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12547
pmc: PMC6717744
doi:
Substances chimiques
Circulating Tumor DNA
0
Oncogene Protein p21(ras)
EC 3.6.5.2
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1827-1835Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Published by FEBS Press and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 15;6:29765
pubmed: 27416752
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jun 15;22(12):3067-77
pubmed: 26847055
Nat Med. 2015 Jul;21(7):795-801
pubmed: 26030179
Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 6;8(23):37491-37501
pubmed: 28415583
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 May 6;67(3):177-193
pubmed: 28248415
Ann Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;29(1):112-118
pubmed: 28950295
Cancer. 2015 Apr 15;121(8):1195-203
pubmed: 25491172
Sci Transl Med. 2014 Feb 19;6(224):224ra24
pubmed: 24553385
Mol Cancer Ther. 2016 May;15(5):1106-12
pubmed: 27037411
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Mar 1;21(5):1087-97
pubmed: 25248381
Ann Oncol. 2014 Oct;25(10):1948-53
pubmed: 25009007
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep;14(9):531-548
pubmed: 28252003
Ann Oncol. 2014 Sep;25(9):1756-61
pubmed: 24942275
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;28(6):1294-1301
pubmed: 28368441
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Aug 20;29(24):3316-21
pubmed: 21788562
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;28(6):1325-1332
pubmed: 28419195
J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 20;29(15):2011-9
pubmed: 21502544
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Feb 1;3(2):211-219
pubmed: 27787550
Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1713-1729
pubmed: 28407110