Differential Variation Analysis Enables Detection of Tumor Heterogeneity Using Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing Data.
Journal
Cancer research
ISSN: 1538-7445
Titre abrégé: Cancer Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2984705R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 10 2019
01 10 2019
Historique:
received:
10
12
2018
revised:
13
05
2019
accepted:
19
07
2019
pubmed:
25
7
2019
medline:
30
5
2020
entrez:
25
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Tumor heterogeneity provides a complex challenge to cancer treatment and is a critical component of therapeutic response, disease recurrence, and patient survival. Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) technologies have revealed the prevalence of intratumor and intertumor heterogeneity. Computational techniques are essential to quantify the differences in variation of these profiles between distinct cell types, tumor subtypes, and patients to fully characterize intratumor and intertumor molecular heterogeneity. In this study, we adapted our algorithm for pathway dysregulation, Expression Variation Analysis (EVA), to perform multivariate statistical analyses of differential variation of expression in gene sets for scRNA-seq. EVA has high sensitivity and specificity to detect pathways with true differential heterogeneity in simulated data. EVA was applied to several public domain scRNA-seq tumor datasets to quantify the landscape of tumor heterogeneity in several key applications in cancer genomics such as immunogenicity, metastasis, and cancer subtypes. Immune pathway heterogeneity of hematopoietic cell populations in breast tumors corresponded to the amount of diversity present in the T-cell repertoire of each individual. Cells from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) primary tumors had significantly more heterogeneity across pathways than cells from metastases, consistent with a model of clonal outgrowth. Moreover, there were dramatic differences in pathway dysregulation across HNSCC basal primary tumors. Within the basal primary tumors, there was increased immune dysregulation in individuals with a high proportion of fibroblasts present in the tumor microenvironment. These results demonstrate the broad utility of EVA to quantify intertumor and intratumor heterogeneity from scRNA-seq data without reliance on low-dimensional visualization. SIGNIFICANCE: This study presents a robust statistical algorithm for evaluating gene expression heterogeneity within pathways or gene sets in single-cell RNA-seq data.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31337651
pii: 0008-5472.CAN-18-3882
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3882
pmc: PMC6844448
mid: NIHMS1535856
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5102-5112Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM007814
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA184926
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA196390
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : K08 CA237732
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA177669
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA062924
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA006973
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM008752
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA212007
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.
Références
Bioinformatics. 2012 Mar 15;28(6):882-3
pubmed: 22257669
Cancer Inform. 2015 Jun 07;14:71-81
pubmed: 26078586
Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Jun;31(6):545-52
pubmed: 23685480
Nature. 2013 Sep 19;501(7467):338-45
pubmed: 24048066
JCI Insight. 2018 Jul 12;3(13):
pubmed: 29997287
Bioinformatics. 2018 Jun 1;34(11):1859-1867
pubmed: 29342249
Cell Syst. 2015 Dec 23;1(6):417-425
pubmed: 26771021
Genome Biol. 2015 Nov 02;16:241
pubmed: 26527291
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004 Jun;61(11):1372-83
pubmed: 15170515
JCI Insight. 2016 Oct 20;1(17):e89829
pubmed: 27777979
Nat Methods. 2016 Mar;13(3):241-4
pubmed: 26780092
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56823
pubmed: 23451093
Bioinformatics. 2016 Apr 15;32(8):1241-3
pubmed: 26668002
Genome Biol. 2017 Sep 12;18(1):174
pubmed: 28899397
Comput Biol Chem. 2016 Aug;63:52-61
pubmed: 26951854
Cell. 2017 Nov 30;171(6):1424-1436.e18
pubmed: 29153835
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 May 21;19(5):
pubmed: 29883428
Biostatistics. 2007 Jan;8(1):118-27
pubmed: 16632515
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2018 Sep;94(5):588-601
pubmed: 28865188
PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 May 27;6(5):e1000792
pubmed: 20523739
Cell. 2018 Aug 23;174(5):1293-1308.e36
pubmed: 29961579
Trends Genet. 2015 Oct;31(10):576-586
pubmed: 26450340
Nat Methods. 2013 Nov;10(11):1093-5
pubmed: 24056876
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Apr 20;43(7):e47
pubmed: 25605792
Cell. 2018 Jul 26;174(3):716-729.e27
pubmed: 29961576
Am J Hum Genet. 2015 May 7;96(5):797-807
pubmed: 25957468
BMC Bioinformatics. 2016 Aug 23;17(1):315
pubmed: 27553427
BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 Oct 22;13:272
pubmed: 23088656
Nat Rev Cancer. 2011 Apr;11(4):237-8
pubmed: 21548400
Cancer Inform. 2014 Oct 23;13(Suppl 5):61-7
pubmed: 25392694
Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Apr;32(4):381-386
pubmed: 24658644
Nature. 2013 Sep 19;501(7467):355-64
pubmed: 24048068
Oncol Rep. 2017 May;37(5):2603-2610
pubmed: 28358435
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 1;115(18):4545-4552
pubmed: 29666255
Trends Genet. 2018 Aug;34(8):639-651
pubmed: 29903534
Neuron. 2019 Jun 19;102(6):1111-1126.e5
pubmed: 31128945
Cell. 2017 Dec 14;171(7):1611-1624.e24
pubmed: 29198524
Trends Cancer. 2018 Apr;4(4):264-268
pubmed: 29606308
Nat Commun. 2017 Jan 16;8:14049
pubmed: 28091601
Nature. 2012 Jan 18;481(7381):306-13
pubmed: 22258609
Nat Biotechnol. 2015 May;33(5):495-502
pubmed: 25867923