Transcriptome profiling of interaction effects of soybean cyst nematodes and soybean aphids on soybean.
Journal
Scientific data
ISSN: 2052-4463
Titre abrégé: Sci Data
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101640192
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 07 2019
24 07 2019
Historique:
received:
27
02
2019
accepted:
30
06
2019
entrez:
26
7
2019
pubmed:
26
7
2019
medline:
18
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Soybean aphid (Aphis glycines; SBA) and soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines; SCN) are two major pests of soybean (Glycine max) in the United States of America. This study aims to characterize three-way interactions among soybean, SBA, and SCN using both demographic and genetic datasets. SCN-resistant and SCN-susceptible soybean cultivars with a combination of soybean aphids (biotype 1) and SCN (HG type 0) in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with six blocks were used to evaluate the three-way interactions in a greenhouse setup. Treatments receiving SCN were infested at planting with 2000 nematode eggs, and the treatments with soybean aphids were infested at second trifoliate growth stage (V2) with 15 soybean aphids. The whole roots were sampled from plants at 5 and 30 days post SBA infestation for RNA sequencing using Illumina Hiseq. 3000. The data comprises of 47 libraries that are useful for further analyses of important genes, which are involved in interaction effects of SBA and SCN on soybean.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31341170
doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0140-4
pii: 10.1038/s41597-019-0140-4
pmc: PMC6656750
doi:
Types de publication
Dataset
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
133Subventions
Organisme : U.S. Department of Agriculture (United States Department of Agriculture)
ID : SD00H469-13
Pays : International
Références
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Apr 20;43(7):e47
pubmed: 25605792
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Feb 14;15(2):e1006792
pubmed: 30763315
Genomics. 2011 Aug;98(2):152-3
pubmed: 21651976
Environ Entomol. 2012 Dec;41(6):1565-74
pubmed: 23321105
Nat Methods. 2018 Jul;15(7):475-476
pubmed: 29967506
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Aug 06;11(8):e1004393
pubmed: 26248053
Nat Methods. 2017 Apr;14(4):417-419
pubmed: 28263959
J Anim Ecol. 2010 Jul;79(4):923-31
pubmed: 20302605
J Econ Entomol. 2011 Oct;104(5):1568-74
pubmed: 22066186
Plant Dis. 2005 Oct;89(10):1020-1026
pubmed: 30791267
Genome Biol. 2009;10(3):R25
pubmed: 19261174
Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 15;27(22):3209-10
pubmed: 21976420
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20
pubmed: 24695404
Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550
pubmed: 25516281
Plant Dis. 2007 Nov;91(11):1473-1476
pubmed: 30780744
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e86415
pubmed: 24466080
Food Chem. 2016 Apr 1;196:776-82
pubmed: 26593554
Sci Data. 2019 Jul 24;6(1):133
pubmed: 31341170
Environ Entomol. 2010 Oct;39(5):1561-9
pubmed: 22546453
Phytopathology. 2016 Dec;106(12):1444-1450
pubmed: 27392178
Bioinformatics. 2016 Oct 1;32(19):3047-8
pubmed: 27312411
Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 1;26(1):139-40
pubmed: 19910308
J Nematol. 2006 Jun;38(2):173-80
pubmed: 19259444
BMC Bioinformatics. 2018 Dec 19;19(1):534
pubmed: 30567491
Annu Rev Entomol. 2011;56:375-99
pubmed: 20868277
Nat Methods. 2015 Apr;12(4):357-60
pubmed: 25751142
Genome Biol. 2013 Apr 25;14(4):R36
pubmed: 23618408
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2006;44:283-303
pubmed: 16704359