[Recommendations from the French CML Study Group (Fi-LMC) for BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutation analysis in chronic myeloid leukemia].
Recommandations du France Intergroupe des leucémies myéloïdes chroniques (Fi-LMC) pour l’examen des mutations du domaine kinase de BCR-ABL1 dans la leucémie myéloïde chronique.
Antineoplastic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Catalytic Domain
Clinical Decision-Making
DNA Mutational Analysis
/ methods
DNA, Neoplasm
/ analysis
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
/ genetics
Drug Substitution
Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl
/ antagonists & inhibitors
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Humans
Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive
/ drug therapy
Molecular Biology
Mutation, Missense
Point Mutation
Protein Domains
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Role
ABL1 inhibitors
ABL1 tyrosine kinase domain mutations
Chronic myeloid leukemia
Inhibiteurs d’ABL1
Leucémie myéloïde chronique
Mutations du domaine tyrosine kinase d’ABL1
Resistance
Résistance
Journal
Bulletin du cancer
ISSN: 1769-6917
Titre abrégé: Bull Cancer
Pays: France
ID NLM: 0072416
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
04
03
2019
revised:
22
05
2019
accepted:
27
05
2019
pubmed:
30
7
2019
medline:
28
2
2020
entrez:
30
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the context of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) resistant to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) mutations still remain the sole biological marker that directly condition therapeutic decision. These recommendations aim at updating the use of BCR-ABL1 mutation testing with respect to new available therapeutic options and at repositioning different testing methods at the era of next generation sequencing (NGS). They have been written by a panel of experts from the French Study Group on CML (Fi-LMC), after a critical review of relevant publications. TKD mutation testing is recommended in case of treatment failure but not in case of optimal response. For patients in warning situation, mutation testing must be discussed depending on the type of TKI used, lasting of the treatment, kinetic evolution of BCR-ABL1 transcripts along time and necessity for switching treatment. The kind and the frequency of TKD mutations occasioning resistance mainly depend on the TKI in use and disease phase. Because of its better sensitivity, NGS methods are recommended for mutation testing rather than Sanger's. Facing a given TKD mutation, therapeutic decision should be taken based on in vitro sensitivity and clinical efficacy data. Identification by sequencing of a TKD mutation known to induce resistance must lead to a therapeutic change. The clinical value of testing methods more sensitive than NGS remains to be assessed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31353136
pii: S0007-4551(19)30259-0
doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2019.05.011
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
BCR-ABL1 fusion protein, human
0
DNA, Neoplasm
0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl
EC 2.7.10.2
Types de publication
Consensus Development Conference
Journal Article
Practice Guideline
Review
Langues
fre
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
113-128Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.