The large repertoire of conifer NLR resistance genes includes drought responsive and highly diversified RNLs.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 08 2019
12 08 2019
Historique:
received:
15
01
2019
accepted:
26
07
2019
entrez:
14
8
2019
pubmed:
14
8
2019
medline:
11
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The NLRs or NBS-LRRs (nucleotide-binding, leucine-rich-repeat) form the largest resistance gene family in plants, with lineage-specific contingents of TNL, CNL and RNL subfamilies and a central role in resilience to stress. The origin, evolution and distribution of NLR sequences has been unclear owing in part to the variable size and diversity of the RNL subfamily and a lack of data in Gymnosperms. We developed, searched and annotated transcriptomes assemblies of seven conifers and identified a resource of 3816 expressed NLR sequences. Our analyses encompassed sequences data spanning the major groups of land plants and determinations of NLR transcripts levels in response to drought in white spruce. We showed that conifers have among the most diverse and numerous RNLs in tested land plants. We report an evolutionary swap in the formation of RNLs, which emerged from the fusion of an RPW8 domain to a NB-ARC domain of CNL. We uncovered a quantitative relationship between RNLs and TNLs across all land plants investigated, with an average ratio of 1:10. The conifer RNL repertoire harbours four distinct groups, with two that differ from Angiosperms, one of which contained several upregulated sequences in response to drought while the majority of responsive NLRs are downregulated.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31406137
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47950-7
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-47950-7
pmc: PMC6691002
doi:
Substances chimiques
NLR Proteins
0
Plant Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
11614Références
BMC Genomics. 2016 Apr 30;17:317
pubmed: 27129402
Plant J. 2005 Apr;42(1):95-110
pubmed: 15773856
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2011 Aug;24(8):918-31
pubmed: 21501087
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jul 1;43(W1):W30-8
pubmed: 25943547
Plant Mol Biol. 2000 Oct;44(3):321-34
pubmed: 11199391
Nature. 2006 Nov 16;444(7117):323-9
pubmed: 17108957
Plant J. 2002 Oct;32(1):77-92
pubmed: 12366802
Plant J. 1999 Nov;20(3):317-32
pubmed: 10571892
Bioinformatics. 2006 Jul 1;22(13):1658-9
pubmed: 16731699
Plant Physiol. 2011 Jun;156(2):779-92
pubmed: 21482634
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 May 24;91(11):5163-7
pubmed: 8197201
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 31;114(5):1063-1068
pubmed: 28096345
Plant Physiol. 2016 Apr;170(4):2095-109
pubmed: 26839128
Cell. 2015 May 21;161(5):1074-1088
pubmed: 26000483
Nature. 2013 May 30;497(7451):579-84
pubmed: 23698360
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Mar 7;114(10):E2053-E2062
pubmed: 28137883
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 28;6:32923
pubmed: 27678195
Plant J. 2004 Jun;38(5):810-22
pubmed: 15144382
BMC Genomics. 2012 Feb 15;13:75
pubmed: 22336098
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):8113-8118
pubmed: 28698366
Genome Biol. 2006;7(4):212
pubmed: 16677430
Trends Plant Sci. 2017 Dec;22(12):1003-1005
pubmed: 29029827
New Phytol. 2015 Jul;207(1):172-87
pubmed: 25728802
G3 (Bethesda). 2018 Mar 28;8(4):1225-1245
pubmed: 29440346
Cell Host Microbe. 2010 Apr 22;7(4):290-301
pubmed: 20413097
New Phytol. 2012 Mar;193(4):1049-63
pubmed: 22212278
Plant Cell. 2016 Jan;28(1):146-59
pubmed: 26744216
Plant Cell. 2003 Apr;15(4):809-34
pubmed: 12671079
Plant Mol Biol. 2008 Apr;66(6):619-36
pubmed: 18247136
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2011 Aug;24(8):897-906
pubmed: 21539434
BMC Plant Biol. 2012 Aug 09;12:139
pubmed: 22877146
PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(11):e1003004
pubmed: 23209402
Mol Genet Genomics. 2009 Jun;281(6):609-26
pubmed: 19263082
Plant Physiol. 2014 Sep;166(1):217-34
pubmed: 25052854
BMC Plant Biol. 2014 May 05;14:120
pubmed: 24885638
Syst Biol. 2012 Dec 1;61(6):1061-7
pubmed: 22780991
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Aug 18;95(17):9750-4
pubmed: 9707547
Genome. 2013 Feb;56(2):91-9
pubmed: 23517318
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 6;8(1):16368
pubmed: 30401938
Mol Genet Genomics. 2003 Dec;270(5):432-41
pubmed: 14586641
Plant J. 2005 Oct;44(2):208-22
pubmed: 16212601
BMC Genomics. 2012 Aug 29;13:434
pubmed: 22931377
Tree Physiol. 2018 Mar 1;38(3):442-456
pubmed: 29040752
Plant J. 2015 Jul;83(2):189-212
pubmed: 26017574
Cell. 1994 Sep 23;78(6):1101-15
pubmed: 7923359
EMBO J. 2002 Sep 2;21(17):4511-9
pubmed: 12198153
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 27;108(39):16463-8
pubmed: 21911370
New Phytol. 2019 Apr;222(2):966-980
pubmed: 30582759
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 7;12(12):e0189203
pubmed: 29216258
Plant J. 2017 Apr;90(1):189-203
pubmed: 28090692
Curr Biol. 2005 May 24;15(10):968-73
pubmed: 15916955
Plant Physiol. 2011 Oct;157(2):757-69
pubmed: 21810963
BMC Genomics. 2013 Feb 19;14:109
pubmed: 23418910
Mol Genet Genomics. 2009 Dec;282(6):617-31
pubmed: 19838736
Plant Physiol. 2018 May;177(1):82-89
pubmed: 29563207
New Phytol. 2008;180(4):766-86
pubmed: 18811621
Plant Physiol. 2011 Sep;157(1):14-28
pubmed: 21730200
Planta. 2005 Jun;221(4):597-601
pubmed: 15889273
Plant Cell. 2019 Oct;31(10):2430-2455
pubmed: 31311833
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 13;115(46):E10979-E10987
pubmed: 30373842
Mol Genet Genomics. 2008 Sep;280(3):187-98
pubmed: 18563445
Science. 2001 Jan 5;291(5501):118-20
pubmed: 11141561
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Jul;33(7):1870-4
pubmed: 27004904
Plant Physiol. 2014 Dec;166(4):1724-32
pubmed: 25349325
Structure. 2009 Feb 13;17(2):172-82
pubmed: 19217388
G3 (Bethesda). 2017 May 5;7(5):1577-1585
pubmed: 28364035
BMC Genet. 2015 May 03;16:48
pubmed: 25935646
J Exp Bot. 2008;59(6):1383-97
pubmed: 18390848
Phytopathology. 2007 Jun;97(6):728-36
pubmed: 18943604
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Mar 19;32(5):1792-7
pubmed: 15034147
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36700
pubmed: 22615795
PLoS Genet. 2015 Jan 24;11(1):e1004945
pubmed: 25617755
BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Jan 12;10:8
pubmed: 20067610
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jul;37(Web Server issue):W202-8
pubmed: 19458158