Reconciling event-labeled gene trees with MUL-trees and species networks.

Gene evolution MUL tree Network reconciliation Phylogenetic network Species evolution Tree reconciliation Triples

Journal

Journal of mathematical biology
ISSN: 1432-1416
Titre abrégé: J Math Biol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7502105

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2019
Historique:
received: 21 12 2018
revised: 08 05 2019
pubmed: 15 8 2019
medline: 20 9 2020
entrez: 15 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Phylogenomics commonly aims to construct evolutionary trees from genomic sequence information. One way to approach this problem is to first estimate event-labeled gene trees (i.e., rooted trees whose non-leaf vertices are labeled by speciation or gene duplication events), and to then look for a species tree which can be reconciled with this tree through a reconciliation map between the trees. In practice, however, it can happen that there is no such map from a given event-labeled tree to any species tree. An important situation where this might arise is where the species evolution is better represented by a network instead of a tree. In this paper, we therefore consider the problem of reconciling event-labeled trees with species networks. In particular, we prove that any event-labeled gene tree can be reconciled with some network and that, under certain mild assumptions on the gene tree, the network can even be assumed to be multi-arc free. To prove this result, we show that we can always reconcile the gene tree with some multi-labeled (MUL-)tree, which can then be "folded up" to produce the desired reconciliation and network. In addition, we study the interplay between reconciliation maps from event-labeled gene trees to MUL-trees and networks. Our results could be useful for understanding how genomes have evolved after undergoing complex evolutionary events such as polyploidy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31410552
doi: 10.1007/s00285-019-01414-8
pii: 10.1007/s00285-019-01414-8
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1885-1925

Références

Bioinformatics. 1998;14(9):819-20
pubmed: 9918954
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Apr 28;12:124
pubmed: 21526987
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Jan;5(1):e1000262
pubmed: 19148271
Bioessays. 2011 Oct;33(10):769-80
pubmed: 21853451
Brief Bioinform. 2011 Sep;12(5):392-400
pubmed: 21949266
Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:23-35
pubmed: 21081312
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53786
pubmed: 23342000
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(Database issue):D240-9
pubmed: 25399418
Algorithms Mol Biol. 2017 Aug 29;12:23
pubmed: 28861118
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2011 Mar-Apr;8(2):517-35
pubmed: 21233529
J Math Biol. 2006 May;52(5):613-32
pubmed: 16463187
BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Aug 28;9:216
pubmed: 19715596
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 19;9(8):e105015
pubmed: 25137074
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Sep;23(9):1784-91
pubmed: 16798795
Discrete Appl Math. 2013 Jan 1;161(1-2):107-117
pubmed: 23175592
J Math Biol. 2017 Jul;75(1):199-237
pubmed: 27904954
Bioinformatics. 2012 Sep 15;28(18):i409-i415
pubmed: 22962460
Trends Genet. 2000 May;16(5):227-31
pubmed: 10782117
J Comput Biol. 2012 Sep;19(9):1073-88
pubmed: 22963134
Algorithms Mol Biol. 2018 Feb 6;13:2
pubmed: 29441122
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 31;9(7):e103622
pubmed: 25080217
Syst Biol. 2016 May;65(3):353-6
pubmed: 27129844
Syst Biol. 2017 Nov 01;66(6):1007-1018
pubmed: 28419377
BMC Genomics. 2014;15 Suppl 6:S12
pubmed: 25572629
J Math Biol. 2013 Jan;66(1-2):399-420
pubmed: 22456957
Methods Mol Biol. 2012;856:29-51
pubmed: 22399454
J Comput Biol. 2008 Oct;15(8):981-1006
pubmed: 18808330
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:642089
pubmed: 24800245
J Theor Biol. 2017 Apr 7;418:129-137
pubmed: 28111320
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(Database issue):D234-9
pubmed: 25429972
J Math Biol. 2016 Dec;73(6-7):1761-1780
pubmed: 27107869
Syst Zool. 1970 Jun;19(2):99-113
pubmed: 5449325
Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):33-6
pubmed: 10592175
Algorithms Mol Biol. 2017 Mar 11;12:4
pubmed: 28293276
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1;34(Database issue):D363-8
pubmed: 16381887
BMC Genomics. 2015;16 Suppl 10:S6
pubmed: 26449687
Trends Genet. 2013 Aug;29(8):439-41
pubmed: 23764187
J Comput Biol. 2009 Oct;16(10):1399-418
pubmed: 19754270
Algorithms Mol Biol. 2016 Apr 16;11:4
pubmed: 27087831
Syst Biol. 2015 Jan;64(1):e42-62
pubmed: 25070970

Auteurs

Marc Hellmuth (M)

Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. mhellmuth@mailbox.org.
Center for Bioinformatics, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany. mhellmuth@mailbox.org.

Katharina T Huber (KT)

School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Vincent Moulton (V)

School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

Selecting optimal software code descriptors-The case of Java.

Yegor Bugayenko, Zamira Kholmatova, Artem Kruglov et al.
1.00
Software Algorithms Programming Languages
Animals Hemiptera Insect Proteins Phylogeny Insecticides
Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids Lycoris NADPH-Ferrihemoprotein Reductase Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Plant Proteins

Classifications MeSH