Trends in survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrests defibrillated by paramedics, first responders and bystanders.


Journal

Resuscitation
ISSN: 1873-1570
Titre abrégé: Resuscitation
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 0332173

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2019
Historique:
received: 24 06 2019
revised: 06 08 2019
accepted: 11 08 2019
pubmed: 21 8 2019
medline: 18 9 2020
entrez: 21 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Although survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is increasing, little is known about the long-term trends in survival for patients defibrillated by first responders and bystanders. Between 2000 and 2017, we included adult non-traumatic OHCA with an initial shockable rhythm from the Victorian Ambulance Cardiac Arrest Registry. Adjusted logistic regression analyses were used to assess trends in survival to hospital discharge according to whether the patient was initially shocked by paramedics, first responders or bystanders. Of the 10,451 initial shockable arrests, 796 (7.6%) and 526 (5.0%) were initially shocked by first responders and bystanders, respectively. Between 2000-02 and 2015-17, the proportion of cases initially shocked by first responders and bystanders increased from 3.8% to 8.2% and from 2.0% to 11.2%, respectively. Over the same period, survival to hospital discharge increased from 11.6% to 28.8% for cases initially shocked by paramedics, from 10.5% to 37.8% for cases initially shocked by first responders, and from 6.7% to 55.5% for cases initially shocked by bystanders (p trend <0.001 for all). In the adjusted analyses, patients initially shocked by first responders (AOR 1.40, 95% CI: 1.18, 1.67; p < 0.001) and bystanders (AOR 2.11, 95% CI: 1.72, 2.59; p < 0.001) were more likely to survive to hospital discharge than those initially shocked by paramedics. The odds of survival increased year-on-year by 8.1% for patients shocked by paramedics (p < 0.001), 6.1% for patients shocked by first responders (p = 0.004), and 11.8% for patients shocked by bystanders (p < 0.001). OHCA patients initially defibrillated by bystanders yielded the largest improvements in survival over time.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Although survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is increasing, little is known about the long-term trends in survival for patients defibrillated by first responders and bystanders.
METHODS
Between 2000 and 2017, we included adult non-traumatic OHCA with an initial shockable rhythm from the Victorian Ambulance Cardiac Arrest Registry. Adjusted logistic regression analyses were used to assess trends in survival to hospital discharge according to whether the patient was initially shocked by paramedics, first responders or bystanders.
RESULTS
Of the 10,451 initial shockable arrests, 796 (7.6%) and 526 (5.0%) were initially shocked by first responders and bystanders, respectively. Between 2000-02 and 2015-17, the proportion of cases initially shocked by first responders and bystanders increased from 3.8% to 8.2% and from 2.0% to 11.2%, respectively. Over the same period, survival to hospital discharge increased from 11.6% to 28.8% for cases initially shocked by paramedics, from 10.5% to 37.8% for cases initially shocked by first responders, and from 6.7% to 55.5% for cases initially shocked by bystanders (p trend <0.001 for all). In the adjusted analyses, patients initially shocked by first responders (AOR 1.40, 95% CI: 1.18, 1.67; p < 0.001) and bystanders (AOR 2.11, 95% CI: 1.72, 2.59; p < 0.001) were more likely to survive to hospital discharge than those initially shocked by paramedics. The odds of survival increased year-on-year by 8.1% for patients shocked by paramedics (p < 0.001), 6.1% for patients shocked by first responders (p = 0.004), and 11.8% for patients shocked by bystanders (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
OHCA patients initially defibrillated by bystanders yielded the largest improvements in survival over time.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31430512
pii: S0300-9572(19)30578-7
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.08.018
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

85-91

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Ziad Nehme (Z)

Centre for Research and Evaluation, Ambulance Victoria, Blackburn North, Victoria, Australia; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Community Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia; NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Pre-hospital Emergency Care Australia and New Zealand (PEC-ANZ), Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: ziad.nehme@ambulance.vic.gov.au.

Emily Andrew (E)

Centre for Research and Evaluation, Ambulance Victoria, Blackburn North, Victoria, Australia; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Stephen Bernard (S)

Centre for Research and Evaluation, Ambulance Victoria, Blackburn North, Victoria, Australia; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Pre-hospital Emergency Care Australia and New Zealand (PEC-ANZ), Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.

Brian Haskins (B)

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Community Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia; NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Pre-hospital Emergency Care Australia and New Zealand (PEC-ANZ), Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Karen Smith (K)

Centre for Research and Evaluation, Ambulance Victoria, Blackburn North, Victoria, Australia; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Community Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia; NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Pre-hospital Emergency Care Australia and New Zealand (PEC-ANZ), Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Discipline of Emergency Medicine, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH