Prescriber perceptions of medication-related computerized decision support systems in hospitals: A synthesis of qualitative research.
Computerized physician order entry
Decision support systems
Medication alert systems
Qualitative research
Systematic review
Journal
International journal of medical informatics
ISSN: 1872-8243
Titre abrégé: Int J Med Inform
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 9711057
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
received:
07
02
2019
revised:
24
05
2019
accepted:
24
06
2019
pubmed:
25
8
2019
medline:
30
11
2019
entrez:
25
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To identify factors that prevent and promote uptake of medication-related computerized decision support systems (CDSS) in hospitals, based on the perceptions of prescribers. Databases Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PubMed and PsycINFO and the top five medical informatics journals were searched. English papers published after 2002, which used a qualitative approach to examine prescriber views of CDSS in hospitals were included. Qualitative data were extracted and mapped to the three domains of the HOT-fit framework (human, organization, and technology). Factors preventing CDSS uptake were perceived threats to autonomy, CDSS conflicting with personal prescribing preferences, and mistrust of CDSS information. Factors promoting CDSS uptake were perceptions that CDSS improves safety and efficiency, and is easy to use. With respect to medication alerts, large numbers of irrelevant alerts reportedly led to alerts being ignored. When using order sentences/order sets, long lists of options led to excessive scrolling or clicks, and resulted in users opting for free text ordering. To promote medication-related CDSS uptake, it is recommended that prescribers' perspectives on CDSS usability and integration into workflow be sought during the design phase, that evidence on CDSS' effectiveness to improve safety be provided to prescribers, and that system information be kept up to date. To improve alert uptake, organizations should ensure that alerts and minimal and relevant. To improve uptake of order sentences/order sets, organizations should minimise the number of options available to prescribers. Future work should focus on exploring prescriber perceptions of other types of CDSS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31445268
pii: S1386-5056(19)30127-3
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.06.024
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
285-295Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.